The feasibility of resistance training versus aerobic exercise in a rehabilitation setting for people living with psychotic disorders: A randomised controlled trial.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Nicole Korman, Robert Stanton, Mike Trott, Brendon Stubbs, Andrea Baker, Cassandra Butler, Dan Siskind, Simon Rosenbaum, Joseph Firth, Rebecca Martland, Talia McIntosh, Nicola Warren, Edward Heffernan, Frances Dark, Justin Chapman
{"title":"The feasibility of resistance training versus aerobic exercise in a rehabilitation setting for people living with psychotic disorders: A randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Nicole Korman, Robert Stanton, Mike Trott, Brendon Stubbs, Andrea Baker, Cassandra Butler, Dan Siskind, Simon Rosenbaum, Joseph Firth, Rebecca Martland, Talia McIntosh, Nicola Warren, Edward Heffernan, Frances Dark, Justin Chapman","doi":"10.1177/00048674251361681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>People with psychotic disorders face significant functional impairments, high levels of disability, multimorbidity and physical health challenges. Despite unique health benefits, resistance training remains underexplored in this population and rarely implemented in real-world mental health settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomised controlled trial comparing resistance training with aerobic interval training in people with psychotic disorders accessing psychiatric rehabilitation. Supervised exercise sessions by exercise physiologists were conducted 3 times per week over 8 weeks. Primary outcomes were feasibility, acceptability and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were psychiatric symptoms, global and physical functioning and the effect of randomisation to exercise type on participation rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 54 participants (median age 31 years, 71.6% male, 75% diagnosed with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder, 55.5% with ⩾3 health conditions) were enrolled. Resistance training met predetermined feasibility and acceptability thresholds and showed comparable results to aerobic interval training with no significant exercise-related adverse events. Within-group analysis revealed significant increases in muscle strength following resistance training. Post-intervention, resistance training participants reported more total weekly minutes of physical activity compared to aerobic interval training, though no other significant between-group differences were observed. Randomisation to exercise type did not influence participation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, resistance training was feasible and acceptable to people with psychotic disorders, with no serious adverse events and comparable to aerobic interval training. Resistance training was successfully implemented in rehabilitation settings with promising improvements in muscle strength and self-reported physical activity. In future, larger longer-term trials comparing resistance training with aerobic interval training, and in comparison with other psychosocial therapies are warranted. Further exploration of participant preference for exercise type on outcomes is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"538-552"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13191080/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674251361681","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: People with psychotic disorders face significant functional impairments, high levels of disability, multimorbidity and physical health challenges. Despite unique health benefits, resistance training remains underexplored in this population and rarely implemented in real-world mental health settings.

Methods: This randomised controlled trial comparing resistance training with aerobic interval training in people with psychotic disorders accessing psychiatric rehabilitation. Supervised exercise sessions by exercise physiologists were conducted 3 times per week over 8 weeks. Primary outcomes were feasibility, acceptability and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were psychiatric symptoms, global and physical functioning and the effect of randomisation to exercise type on participation rates.

Results: In total, 54 participants (median age 31 years, 71.6% male, 75% diagnosed with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder, 55.5% with ⩾3 health conditions) were enrolled. Resistance training met predetermined feasibility and acceptability thresholds and showed comparable results to aerobic interval training with no significant exercise-related adverse events. Within-group analysis revealed significant increases in muscle strength following resistance training. Post-intervention, resistance training participants reported more total weekly minutes of physical activity compared to aerobic interval training, though no other significant between-group differences were observed. Randomisation to exercise type did not influence participation.

Conclusion: In conclusion, resistance training was feasible and acceptable to people with psychotic disorders, with no serious adverse events and comparable to aerobic interval training. Resistance training was successfully implemented in rehabilitation settings with promising improvements in muscle strength and self-reported physical activity. In future, larger longer-term trials comparing resistance training with aerobic interval training, and in comparison with other psychosocial therapies are warranted. Further exploration of participant preference for exercise type on outcomes is recommended.

抗阻训练与有氧运动在精神病患者康复环境中的可行性:一项随机对照试验。
目的:精神障碍患者面临显著的功能障碍、高水平的残疾、多病和身体健康挑战。尽管有独特的健康益处,但阻力训练在这一人群中仍未得到充分探索,而且很少在现实世界的心理健康环境中实施。方法:本随机对照试验比较抗阻训练和有氧间歇训练对精神病患者进行精神康复的影响。在运动生理学家的监督下,每周进行3次锻炼,持续8周。主要结局是可行性、可接受性和不良事件。次要结果是精神症状、整体和身体功能以及随机运动类型对参与率的影响。结果:总共招募了54名参与者(中位年龄31岁,71.6%为男性,75%被诊断为精神分裂症/分裂情感性障碍,55.5%的健康状况为大于或等于3)。阻力训练达到预定的可行性和可接受性阈值,并显示出与有氧间歇训练相当的结果,没有明显的运动相关不良事件。组内分析显示阻力训练后肌肉力量显著增加。干预后,与有氧间歇训练相比,阻力训练参与者报告的每周总体力活动分钟数更多,但没有观察到组间其他显著差异。运动类型的随机化对参与没有影响。结论:抗阻训练对精神障碍患者是可行和可接受的,无严重不良事件,与有氧间歇训练相当。阻力训练在康复环境中成功实施,有望改善肌肉力量和自我报告的身体活动。未来,将阻力训练与有氧间歇训练进行更大规模的长期试验,并与其他社会心理疗法进行比较是有必要的。建议进一步探讨参与者对运动类型的偏好对结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the official Journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP). The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is a monthly journal publishing original articles which describe research or report opinions of interest to psychiatrists. These contributions may be presented as original research, reviews, perspectives, commentaries and letters to the editor. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the leading psychiatry journal of the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书