Mitigating the digital divide: exploring moderation and mediation effects on eHealth performance in a comparative study of Europe and Southeast Asia.

IF 3.3 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
mHealth Pub Date : 2025-10-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.21037/mhealth-24-67
Chih-Hung Chen
{"title":"Mitigating the digital divide: exploring moderation and mediation effects on eHealth performance in a comparative study of Europe and Southeast Asia.","authors":"Chih-Hung Chen","doi":"10.21037/mhealth-24-67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The digital divide significantly influences healthcare accessibility and outcomes, particularly regarding eHealth technologies. Disparities in eHealth adoption between Europe and Southeast Asia underscore the impact of E-government development on eHealth performance. This study focuses on digital literacy as a mediating factor and religious beliefs as a moderating variable, recognizing that these elements can shape the effectiveness of eHealth initiatives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative analysis was conducted using secondary data from 31 geographically diverse countries, representing both developed and emerging economies, spanning the years 2019 to 2022. This period was chosen due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which exacerbated the digital divide in eHealth adoption and accessibility. The analysis examined the relationships between E-government development, digital literacy, religious beliefs, and eHealth performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings indicate that E-government development positively influences eHealth performance, with digital literacy playing a significant mediating role in this relationship. Additionally, religious beliefs, particularly Atheism, were found to moderate the relationship between E-government development and eHealth performance. Regions with lower levels of religiosity demonstrated a greater receptiveness to eHealth technologies, suggesting that cultural factors significantly affect technology adoption.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results underscore the necessity of integrating digital literacy initiatives alongside E-government development to enhance eHealth performance effectively. Policymakers should consider the cultural and religious landscape when designing eHealth strategies to ensure equitable access to healthcare resources. By addressing both technological and cultural barriers, it is possible to improve healthcare accessibility and outcomes for diverse populations, ultimately bridging the digital divide in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":74181,"journal":{"name":"mHealth","volume":"11 ","pages":"51"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12593973/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mHealth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-24-67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The digital divide significantly influences healthcare accessibility and outcomes, particularly regarding eHealth technologies. Disparities in eHealth adoption between Europe and Southeast Asia underscore the impact of E-government development on eHealth performance. This study focuses on digital literacy as a mediating factor and religious beliefs as a moderating variable, recognizing that these elements can shape the effectiveness of eHealth initiatives.

Methods: A quantitative analysis was conducted using secondary data from 31 geographically diverse countries, representing both developed and emerging economies, spanning the years 2019 to 2022. This period was chosen due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which exacerbated the digital divide in eHealth adoption and accessibility. The analysis examined the relationships between E-government development, digital literacy, religious beliefs, and eHealth performance.

Results: The findings indicate that E-government development positively influences eHealth performance, with digital literacy playing a significant mediating role in this relationship. Additionally, religious beliefs, particularly Atheism, were found to moderate the relationship between E-government development and eHealth performance. Regions with lower levels of religiosity demonstrated a greater receptiveness to eHealth technologies, suggesting that cultural factors significantly affect technology adoption.

Conclusions: The results underscore the necessity of integrating digital literacy initiatives alongside E-government development to enhance eHealth performance effectively. Policymakers should consider the cultural and religious landscape when designing eHealth strategies to ensure equitable access to healthcare resources. By addressing both technological and cultural barriers, it is possible to improve healthcare accessibility and outcomes for diverse populations, ultimately bridging the digital divide in healthcare.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

缓解数字鸿沟:在欧洲和东南亚的比较研究中探索对电子医疗绩效的调节和中介效应。
背景:数字鸿沟显著影响医疗可及性和结果,特别是在电子医疗技术方面。欧洲和东南亚在电子医疗采用方面的差异凸显了电子政务发展对电子医疗绩效的影响。本研究的重点是数字素养作为中介因素和宗教信仰作为调节变量,认识到这些因素可以塑造电子卫生倡议的有效性。方法:利用来自31个地理位置不同的国家(包括发达经济体和新兴经济体)的二手数据进行定量分析,时间跨度为2019年至2022年。之所以选择这一时期,是因为2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行加剧了电子医疗采用和可及性方面的数字鸿沟。该分析考察了电子政务发展、数字素养、宗教信仰和电子健康绩效之间的关系。结果:研究结果表明,电子政务发展对电子医疗绩效有正向影响,其中数字素养在这一关系中起着显著的中介作用。此外,宗教信仰,特别是无神论,被发现调节电子政务发展和电子医疗绩效之间的关系。宗教虔诚程度较低的地区对电子健康技术的接受程度更高,这表明文化因素对技术采用有显著影响。结论:研究结果强调了将数字素养倡议与电子政务发展相结合以有效提高电子卫生绩效的必要性。决策者在设计电子卫生战略时应考虑文化和宗教景观,以确保公平获得卫生保健资源。通过解决技术和文化障碍,有可能改善不同人群的医疗保健可及性和结果,最终弥合医疗保健领域的数字鸿沟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书