When the hospital becomes the battlefield: patients as stakeholders in mass casualty incidents.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Galia Karp Kahana, Shlomi Codish
{"title":"When the hospital becomes the battlefield: patients as stakeholders in mass casualty incidents.","authors":"Galia Karp Kahana, Shlomi Codish","doi":"10.1186/s13584-025-00728-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hospitals are uniquely positioned during disasters, functioning as first-line responders and at risk themselves. While system preparedness and staff resilience have been widely studied, the experience and preparedness of patients admitted to hospitals during mass casualty incidents (MCIs) have received little attention. This commentary was prompted by the recent study of Wolff et al., which assessed inpatients’ knowledge of how to respond during an MCI and the barriers they perceived in such situations. Their work highlights gaps in patient awareness and preparedness, raising the question of whether and how inpatients should be involved in disaster response. Drawing on the experience of Soroka Medical Center during the June 2025 Israel–Iran conflict, we reflect on these findings in the context of a real-world missile strike on a major tertiary medical center. On June 19, 2025, Soroka was directly struck by a ballistic missile that destroyed a surgical inpatient building, rendering 562 beds unusable and necessitating mass evacuation and transfers. The event revealed the complexity of patient reactions—from acute fear and uncertainty to pragmatic acceptance of crowding in compromised conditions. Hospital leadership rapidly instituted patient education on air-raid protocols, relocated vulnerable patients, and implemented staff refresher training. Despite these efforts, challenges in communication, rumor control, and logistics significantly affected inpatients’ sense of safety and continuity of care.  CONCLUSIONS: Wolff et al.’s study and Soroka’s lived experience converge on a critical insight: patients cannot be passive bystanders in disasters. Their perceptions, behaviors, and resilience have a direct impact on hospital functionality. Future research should define the scope of patient roles in preparedness, assess the psychological impact of preparedness training, and inform scalable policies for integrating patients into hospital resilience frameworks. Incorporating patient preparedness into disaster planning is crucial, especially during times of heightened alert and in regions prone to conflict or natural disasters. </p>","PeriodicalId":46694,"journal":{"name":"Israel Journal of Health Policy Research","volume":"14 1","pages":"64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12599098/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Journal of Health Policy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-025-00728-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hospitals are uniquely positioned during disasters, functioning as first-line responders and at risk themselves. While system preparedness and staff resilience have been widely studied, the experience and preparedness of patients admitted to hospitals during mass casualty incidents (MCIs) have received little attention. This commentary was prompted by the recent study of Wolff et al., which assessed inpatients’ knowledge of how to respond during an MCI and the barriers they perceived in such situations. Their work highlights gaps in patient awareness and preparedness, raising the question of whether and how inpatients should be involved in disaster response. Drawing on the experience of Soroka Medical Center during the June 2025 Israel–Iran conflict, we reflect on these findings in the context of a real-world missile strike on a major tertiary medical center. On June 19, 2025, Soroka was directly struck by a ballistic missile that destroyed a surgical inpatient building, rendering 562 beds unusable and necessitating mass evacuation and transfers. The event revealed the complexity of patient reactions—from acute fear and uncertainty to pragmatic acceptance of crowding in compromised conditions. Hospital leadership rapidly instituted patient education on air-raid protocols, relocated vulnerable patients, and implemented staff refresher training. Despite these efforts, challenges in communication, rumor control, and logistics significantly affected inpatients’ sense of safety and continuity of care.  CONCLUSIONS: Wolff et al.’s study and Soroka’s lived experience converge on a critical insight: patients cannot be passive bystanders in disasters. Their perceptions, behaviors, and resilience have a direct impact on hospital functionality. Future research should define the scope of patient roles in preparedness, assess the psychological impact of preparedness training, and inform scalable policies for integrating patients into hospital resilience frameworks. Incorporating patient preparedness into disaster planning is crucial, especially during times of heightened alert and in regions prone to conflict or natural disasters.

当医院成为战场:患者成为大规模伤亡事件的利益相关者。
医院在灾害中具有独特的地位,既是一线应急人员,本身也面临风险。虽然系统准备和工作人员复原力已被广泛研究,但在大规模伤亡事件(MCIs)期间入院患者的经验和准备很少受到关注。这篇评论是由Wolff等人最近的研究引起的,该研究评估了住院患者在MCI期间如何应对的知识以及他们在这种情况下感受到的障碍。他们的工作突出了患者意识和准备方面的差距,提出了住院患者是否以及如何参与灾害应对的问题。根据索罗卡医疗中心在2025年6月以色列-伊朗冲突期间的经验,我们在一个主要三级医疗中心遭受导弹袭击的现实背景下反思这些调查结果。2025年6月19日,索罗卡被一枚弹道导弹直接击中,摧毁了一座外科住院大楼,562张病床无法使用,需要大规模疏散和转移。这一事件揭示了病人反应的复杂性——从极度的恐惧和不确定,到在妥协的条件下对拥挤的实际接受。医院领导层迅速对病人进行了关于空袭协议的教育,重新安置了脆弱的病人,并实施了员工进修培训。尽管做出了这些努力,但在沟通、谣言控制和后勤方面的挑战显著影响了住院患者的安全感和护理的连续性。结论:Wolff等人的研究和Soroka的亲身经历汇聚在一个关键的洞见上:在灾难中,患者不能是被动的旁观者。他们的观念、行为和适应能力对医院的功能有直接的影响。未来的研究应明确患者在准备中的角色范围,评估准备培训的心理影响,并为将患者纳入医院恢复力框架的可扩展政策提供信息。将病人准备纳入灾害规划至关重要,特别是在高度警戒时期和在容易发生冲突或自然灾害的地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.40%
发文量
38
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书