Minimal Criteria to Screen for Wilson Disease: A Delphi Consensus in the United States.

IF 1.6 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
International Journal of Hepatology Pub Date : 2025-11-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ijh/5525442
Jeff M Bronstein, Regino P Gonzalez-Peralta, Matthew Lorincz, Valentina Medici, Sergio Diaz-Mendoza, Krystallia Pantiri
{"title":"Minimal Criteria to Screen for Wilson Disease: A Delphi Consensus in the United States.","authors":"Jeff M Bronstein, Regino P Gonzalez-Peralta, Matthew Lorincz, Valentina Medici, Sergio Diaz-Mendoza, Krystallia Pantiri","doi":"10.1155/ijh/5525442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective was to develop consensus on minimal screening criteria for Wilson disease (WD) diagnosis in US gastroenterology and neurology settings for implementation in clinical practice to support the timely diagnosis of WD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified Delphi panel with three rounds was conducted. The first round survey was developed with input from a steering committee of four clinical experts in WD who set the analysis rules (consensus: ≥ 80%). Other US gastroenterologists/hepatologists or neurologists with experience treating WD were recruited using purposive sampling, and 32 were invited to participate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven panelists completed the three rounds. Consensus was reached for 94/126 (74.6%) statements. All panelists agreed that hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, or stigmata of liver disease are suggestive of WD in patients with a neuropsychiatric manifestation; a neurologic exam, 24-h urine copper, ceruloplasmin, and Kayser-Fleischer (KF) ring examination should be performed; and liver biopsy and liver copper determination can be a useful final stage to confirm WD diagnosis. Panelists agreed that noninvasive testing should be performed prior to invasive testing and that the absence of KF rings does not exclude a diagnosis of WD. Panelists agreed that it is important to collaborate in a multidisciplinary team.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified minimal criteria to raise suspicion of WD, minimal tests to confirm or rule out a WD diagnosis, and areas with poor consensus to be explored in future research. These results can complement clinical practice guidance and support cross-specialty collaboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":46297,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hepatology","volume":"2025 ","pages":"5525442"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12596148/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijh/5525442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The objective was to develop consensus on minimal screening criteria for Wilson disease (WD) diagnosis in US gastroenterology and neurology settings for implementation in clinical practice to support the timely diagnosis of WD.

Methods: A modified Delphi panel with three rounds was conducted. The first round survey was developed with input from a steering committee of four clinical experts in WD who set the analysis rules (consensus: ≥ 80%). Other US gastroenterologists/hepatologists or neurologists with experience treating WD were recruited using purposive sampling, and 32 were invited to participate.

Results: Eleven panelists completed the three rounds. Consensus was reached for 94/126 (74.6%) statements. All panelists agreed that hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, or stigmata of liver disease are suggestive of WD in patients with a neuropsychiatric manifestation; a neurologic exam, 24-h urine copper, ceruloplasmin, and Kayser-Fleischer (KF) ring examination should be performed; and liver biopsy and liver copper determination can be a useful final stage to confirm WD diagnosis. Panelists agreed that noninvasive testing should be performed prior to invasive testing and that the absence of KF rings does not exclude a diagnosis of WD. Panelists agreed that it is important to collaborate in a multidisciplinary team.

Conclusions: This study identified minimal criteria to raise suspicion of WD, minimal tests to confirm or rule out a WD diagnosis, and areas with poor consensus to be explored in future research. These results can complement clinical practice guidance and support cross-specialty collaboration.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

筛选肝豆状核变性的最低标准:美国德尔菲共识。
背景:目的是在美国胃肠病学和神经病学设置中就威尔逊病(WD)诊断的最低筛查标准达成共识,以便在临床实践中实施,以支持WD的及时诊断。方法:采用三轮改良德尔菲法。第一轮调查是由四名WD临床专家组成的指导委员会制定的,他们制定了分析规则(共识:≥80%)。其他有治疗WD经验的美国胃肠病学家/肝病学家或神经学家采用有目的的抽样方法被招募,并邀请32人参加。结果:11名小组成员完成了三轮讨论。126份报告中有94份(74.6%)达成共识。所有小组成员一致认为,肝肿大、脾肿大或肝脏疾病的污点提示有神经精神表现的患者患有WD;应进行神经系统检查、24小时尿铜、铜蓝蛋白和凯瑟-弗莱舍(KF)环检查;肝活检和肝铜含量测定可作为确诊WD的最后阶段。小组成员一致认为,非侵入性检查应在侵入性检查之前进行,KF环的缺失并不排除WD的诊断。小组成员一致认为,在一个多学科团队中进行合作是很重要的。结论:本研究确定了提出WD怀疑的最小标准,确定或排除WD诊断的最小测试,以及在未来研究中有待探索的共识较差的领域。这些结果可以补充临床实践指导和支持跨专业合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Hepatology
International Journal of Hepatology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Hepatology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the medical, surgical, pathological, biochemical, and physiological aspects of hepatology, as well as the management of disorders affecting the liver, gallbladder, biliary tree, and pancreas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书