Enhanced Discharge Bundles to Reduce Length of Stay.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal for Healthcare Quality Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-11 DOI:10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000498
Rika Ohkuma, Yingjie Weng, Jill Weeks, Jason Hom, Jeffrey Chi, Rudolph Arthofer, Neera Ahuja
{"title":"Enhanced Discharge Bundles to Reduce Length of Stay.","authors":"Rika Ohkuma, Yingjie Weng, Jill Weeks, Jason Hom, Jeffrey Chi, Rudolph Arthofer, Neera Ahuja","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Length of stay (LOS) is a critical metric for the efficient utilization of limited resources. A multidisciplinary task force in an academic hospital was created to optimize discharge planning with expanded resources to support a structured discharge process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January and June 2023, multiple interventions were implemented in Hospital Medicine group. Inpatient LOS and other process, outcome, and balancing measures in the post-intervention period (July to December 2023) were compared to those in the pre-intervention period (July to December 2022). The patient demographics and clinical characteristics were adjusted for confounding factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean inpatient LOS was 5.8 days post-intervention compared with 6.5 days in the pre-intervention cohort. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, we found a significant reduction in inpatient LOS by 0.56 days ( p = .019), while it did not affect all-cause readmissions or emergency department (ED) visits within 30 days after discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our multidisciplinary discharge bundle, appropriate case management support level and documentation enhancement seem to be a promising approach for coordinating discharge communication and subsequently reducing the LOS. Our plan is to scale this approach to other clinical areas, address identified care progression delays, and better manage the ED throughput to improve the care delivery system.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000498","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Length of stay (LOS) is a critical metric for the efficient utilization of limited resources. A multidisciplinary task force in an academic hospital was created to optimize discharge planning with expanded resources to support a structured discharge process.

Methods: Between January and June 2023, multiple interventions were implemented in Hospital Medicine group. Inpatient LOS and other process, outcome, and balancing measures in the post-intervention period (July to December 2023) were compared to those in the pre-intervention period (July to December 2022). The patient demographics and clinical characteristics were adjusted for confounding factors.

Results: The mean inpatient LOS was 5.8 days post-intervention compared with 6.5 days in the pre-intervention cohort. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, we found a significant reduction in inpatient LOS by 0.56 days ( p = .019), while it did not affect all-cause readmissions or emergency department (ED) visits within 30 days after discharge.

Conclusions: Our multidisciplinary discharge bundle, appropriate case management support level and documentation enhancement seem to be a promising approach for coordinating discharge communication and subsequently reducing the LOS. Our plan is to scale this approach to other clinical areas, address identified care progression delays, and better manage the ED throughput to improve the care delivery system.

增强出院包,减少住院时间。
停留时间(LOS)是有效利用有限资源的关键指标。在一家学术医院建立了一个多学科工作队,以扩大资源来优化出院计划,以支持结构化的出院流程。方法:于2023年1 - 6月在医院内科组实施多项干预措施。将干预后(2023年7月至12月)与干预前(2022年7月至12月)的住院LOS及其他过程、结果和平衡措施进行比较。根据混杂因素调整患者人口统计学和临床特征。结果:干预后平均住院时间为5.8天,而干预前为6.5天。在调整了潜在的混杂因素后,我们发现住院LOS显著减少了0.56天(p = 0.019),而它不影响出院后30天内的全因再入院或急诊(ED)就诊。结论:我们的多学科出院包,适当的病例管理支持水平和文件增强似乎是协调出院沟通并随后减少LOS的有希望的方法。我们的计划是将这种方法扩展到其他临床领域,解决已确定的护理进展延迟问题,并更好地管理急诊科的吞吐量,以改善医疗服务系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Journal for Healthcare Quality HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as: Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书