Effect of the implementation of a selective digestive decontamination protocol in an intensive care unit.

IF 1.2 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Journal of Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-31 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.2478/jccm-2025-0025
Rosario Fernández-Fernández, Eugenia Yuste-Ossorio, Natalia Chueca-García, Purificación Fernández-Morales, Rocio Morón-Romero, Manuel Colmenero
{"title":"Effect of the implementation of a selective digestive decontamination protocol in an intensive care unit.","authors":"Rosario Fernández-Fernández, Eugenia Yuste-Ossorio, Natalia Chueca-García, Purificación Fernández-Morales, Rocio Morón-Romero, Manuel Colmenero","doi":"10.2478/jccm-2025-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The use of selective digestive decontamination (SDD) in critically ill patients remains controversial. The impact of antimicrobial resistance varies according to multiple factors attributed to the type of patient and the characteristics of intensive care units (ICU).</p><p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>to describe the effect of the implementation of a selective digestive decontamination protocol on the incidence of nosocomial infections and colonization of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) in an intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Prospective observational study in a general ICU of a University Hospital. All patients admitted for 2 years (divided into 1-year periods) before and after the implementation of the SDD were included. This intervention was performed in all patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation in the second period. Incidence density rates were determined for all nosocomial infections (per days of stay) and device-associated infections (per days of use), and risk ratio (RR) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Microbiological surveillance of the colonization status of patients was performed on admission and on a weekly basis. A univariate analysis was performed for comparison between groups. A p<0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1532 patients were included in the pre-intervention period (pre-SDD) and 1734 in the post-intervention period (post-SDD). The incidence of all infections decreased [9.21 vs 6.54 per days of stay; RR: 0,71 (0,428 - 1,172), p=0,16], although not significantly. Both catheter-related bacteremias and all catheter-related bacteremias together (primary and secondary) were significantly reduced [4.49 vs 0.71 per 1000 days of use; RR: 0,157 (0,017 - 0,723), p=0,006]. The colonization rates by MDRO also decreased (3.26% vs 2.36%), but not significantly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of SDD significantly decreased the number of catheter-related bacteraemias, without an increase in MDRO colonization.</p>","PeriodicalId":44227,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"11 4","pages":"357-366"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12592849/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jccm-2025-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The use of selective digestive decontamination (SDD) in critically ill patients remains controversial. The impact of antimicrobial resistance varies according to multiple factors attributed to the type of patient and the characteristics of intensive care units (ICU).

Aim of the study: to describe the effect of the implementation of a selective digestive decontamination protocol on the incidence of nosocomial infections and colonization of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) in an intensive care unit.

Materials and methods: Prospective observational study in a general ICU of a University Hospital. All patients admitted for 2 years (divided into 1-year periods) before and after the implementation of the SDD were included. This intervention was performed in all patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation in the second period. Incidence density rates were determined for all nosocomial infections (per days of stay) and device-associated infections (per days of use), and risk ratio (RR) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Microbiological surveillance of the colonization status of patients was performed on admission and on a weekly basis. A univariate analysis was performed for comparison between groups. A p<0.05 was considered significant.

Results: A total of 1532 patients were included in the pre-intervention period (pre-SDD) and 1734 in the post-intervention period (post-SDD). The incidence of all infections decreased [9.21 vs 6.54 per days of stay; RR: 0,71 (0,428 - 1,172), p=0,16], although not significantly. Both catheter-related bacteremias and all catheter-related bacteremias together (primary and secondary) were significantly reduced [4.49 vs 0.71 per 1000 days of use; RR: 0,157 (0,017 - 0,723), p=0,006]. The colonization rates by MDRO also decreased (3.26% vs 2.36%), but not significantly.

Conclusions: Implementation of SDD significantly decreased the number of catheter-related bacteraemias, without an increase in MDRO colonization.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在重症监护病房实施选择性消化净化方案的效果。
在危重患者中使用选择性消化净化(SDD)仍然存在争议。抗菌素耐药性的影响因患者类型和重症监护病房(ICU)特点等多种因素而异。本研究的目的:描述在重症监护病房实施选择性消化净化方案对医院感染发生率和多药耐药菌(MDRO)定植的影响。材料与方法:在某大学医院普通ICU进行前瞻性观察研究。纳入实施SDD前后住院2年的所有患者(分为1年期)。所有在第二阶段接受有创机械通气的患者都进行了这种干预。确定所有医院感染(每住院天数)和器械相关感染(每使用天数)的发病率密度,并以95%置信区间计算风险比(RR)。在入院时和每周对患者的定植状态进行微生物监测。组间比较采用单因素分析。A结果:干预前(pre-SDD) 1532例,干预后(post-SDD) 1734例。所有感染的发生率下降[9.21 vs 6.54 / d];RR: 0.71 (0,428 - 1,172), p= 0.16],但差异不显著。导管相关菌血症和所有导管相关菌血症(原发性和继发性)均显著降低[每1000天使用4.49 vs 0.71;RR: 0,157 (0,017 - 0,723), p=0,006]。MDRO的定殖率也有所下降(3.26%比2.36%),但差异不显著。结论:SDD的实施显著降低了导管相关菌血症的数量,而没有增加MDRO的定植。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Critical Care Medicine
Journal of Critical Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
21
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书