Quality of Life After Robotic Abdominal Surgery - A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Surgical Innovation Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-10 DOI:10.1177/15533506251392428
Jessica Stockheim, Felix-Lukas Fiedler, Mihailo Andric, Sara Al-Madhi, Maximilian Dölling, Roland Croner, Aristotelis Perrakis
{"title":"Quality of Life After Robotic Abdominal Surgery - A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Jessica Stockheim, Felix-Lukas Fiedler, Mihailo Andric, Sara Al-Madhi, Maximilian Dölling, Roland Croner, Aristotelis Perrakis","doi":"10.1177/15533506251392428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundRobotic procedures are still increasing in abdominal surgery. Yet, little is known about the postoperative Quality of Life (pQoL) after these procedures. The aim of this study was to determine the pQoL of patients who underwent robotic-assisted abdominal surgery.MethodsAs a cross-sectional, retrospective study, several validated questionnaires were used to evaluate the pQoL. After confirmed consent patients who underwent robotic upper gastrointestinal tract (UGI), hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB), and colorectal (CR) procedures between 03/2020 and 03/2023 were enrolled. Subgroup analysis referred to oncologic and non-oncologic indications, postoperative time periods and age >70 years. Scoring was adjusted to a scale of 0 to 100 (as the best QoL) for comparability.ResultsA total of 197 patients were included (<i>n</i> = 111 for oncological indications, <i>n</i> = 86 for functional, non-oncological indications). Organ-related subgroup analyses showed an overall score of >70 for each group (oncologic: UGI: 75.6 ± 16.6; HPB: 85.6 ± 15.7; CR: 81.9 ± 18.5 and non-oncologic: UGI: 76.0 ± 14.8; HPB: 78.9 ± 13.2; CR: 82.4 ± 6.6). A decline in pQoL was observed during the second year after surgery, evident in both oncologic (<1 year: 80.7 ± 16.2 vs 1-2 years: 73.1 ± 19.7 vs 2-3 years: 88.4 ± 11.2, <i>p</i> = .005) and non-oncologic patients (<1 year: 80.7 ± 10.1 vs 1-2 years: 69.7 ± 18.9 vs 2-3 years: 75.6 ± 12.5, <i>p</i> = .033). PQoL was similar for patients under and above 70 years.ConclusionThe overall pQoL for abdominal surgery was good regardless of the indication or the organ system. A decline in the pQoL was noted during the second year after surgery. Due to the retrospective design and small subgroups, further longitudinal studies are required to determine the long-term QoL and influencing factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"205-216"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13076959/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251392428","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundRobotic procedures are still increasing in abdominal surgery. Yet, little is known about the postoperative Quality of Life (pQoL) after these procedures. The aim of this study was to determine the pQoL of patients who underwent robotic-assisted abdominal surgery.MethodsAs a cross-sectional, retrospective study, several validated questionnaires were used to evaluate the pQoL. After confirmed consent patients who underwent robotic upper gastrointestinal tract (UGI), hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB), and colorectal (CR) procedures between 03/2020 and 03/2023 were enrolled. Subgroup analysis referred to oncologic and non-oncologic indications, postoperative time periods and age >70 years. Scoring was adjusted to a scale of 0 to 100 (as the best QoL) for comparability.ResultsA total of 197 patients were included (n = 111 for oncological indications, n = 86 for functional, non-oncological indications). Organ-related subgroup analyses showed an overall score of >70 for each group (oncologic: UGI: 75.6 ± 16.6; HPB: 85.6 ± 15.7; CR: 81.9 ± 18.5 and non-oncologic: UGI: 76.0 ± 14.8; HPB: 78.9 ± 13.2; CR: 82.4 ± 6.6). A decline in pQoL was observed during the second year after surgery, evident in both oncologic (<1 year: 80.7 ± 16.2 vs 1-2 years: 73.1 ± 19.7 vs 2-3 years: 88.4 ± 11.2, p = .005) and non-oncologic patients (<1 year: 80.7 ± 10.1 vs 1-2 years: 69.7 ± 18.9 vs 2-3 years: 75.6 ± 12.5, p = .033). PQoL was similar for patients under and above 70 years.ConclusionThe overall pQoL for abdominal surgery was good regardless of the indication or the organ system. A decline in the pQoL was noted during the second year after surgery. Due to the retrospective design and small subgroups, further longitudinal studies are required to determine the long-term QoL and influencing factors.

机器人腹部手术后的生活质量-一项回顾性横断面研究。
机器人手术在腹部手术中的应用仍在增加。然而,对这些手术后的术后生活质量(pQoL)知之甚少。本研究的目的是确定接受机器人辅助腹部手术的患者的pQoL。方法采用横断面、回顾性研究,采用若干有效问卷对pQoL进行评价。经确认同意后,在2020年3月至2023年3月期间接受机器人上胃肠道(UGI)、肝胆胰(HPB)和结肠直肠(CR)手术的患者入组。亚组分析参照肿瘤和非肿瘤适应症、术后时间和年龄70岁。评分调整为0到100(作为最佳生活质量)的可比性。结果共纳入197例患者(肿瘤指征111例,功能性非肿瘤指征86例)。器官相关亚组分析显示,两组患者总体评分均为bbbb70分(肿瘤学:UGI: 75.6±16.6;HPB: 85.6±15.7;CR: 81.9±18.5;非肿瘤学:UGI: 76.0±14.8;HPB: 78.9±13.2;CR: 82.4±6.6)。术后第二年pQoL下降,肿瘤患者(p = 0.005)和非肿瘤患者(p = 0.033)均有明显下降。70岁以下和70岁以上患者的PQoL相似。结论腹腔手术不论其适应证或脏器系统,总体pQoL均良好。术后第二年pQoL出现下降。由于回顾性设计和小亚组,需要进一步的纵向研究来确定长期生活质量和影响因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical Innovation
Surgical Innovation 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书