Deep learning approach for DCE-MRI parameter estimation: Evaluating signal intensity and concentration-time curve-based convolution-neural-networks

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Magnetic resonance imaging Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-07 DOI:10.1016/j.mri.2025.110559
Piyush Kumar Prajapati , Rakesh Kumar Gupta , Anup Singh
{"title":"Deep learning approach for DCE-MRI parameter estimation: Evaluating signal intensity and concentration-time curve-based convolution-neural-networks","authors":"Piyush Kumar Prajapati ,&nbsp;Rakesh Kumar Gupta ,&nbsp;Anup Singh","doi":"10.1016/j.mri.2025.110559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is common technique for assessing tissue perfusion and permeability in brain tumors (e.g., gliomas), using generalized tracer kinetic (GTK) analysis. However, conventional non-linear least squares (NLLS) methods are computationally expensive and sensitive to noise and protocol variations (e.g., temporal resolution, flip angle), leading to inconsistent parameter estimates. Most recent deep learning methods use signal-intensity and pre-contrast T1, without addressing acquisition protocol variation effects. We propose CNN<sub>CON</sub>, a concentration curve-based convolutional neural network-based approach for GTK parameter estimation, designed to adapt to various DCE-MRI protocols with faster processing and investigate its accuracy and robustness to protocol variations. CNN<sub>CON</sub> was trained on synthetic data with protocol variations, and fine-tuned on 72 glioma patients(grade 2–4). Validation was performed on 18 test patients and two external datasets: cross-scanner(<em>n</em> = 9, 1.5 T) and cross-institutional(<em>n</em> = 6, different hospital). Performance was compared against NLLS and AIF-TK Net. CNN<sub>CON</sub> achieved mean absolute errors of 111 ± 70 × 10<sup>−5</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>, 134 ± 53 × 10<sup>−5</sup>, and 133 ± 57 × 10<sup>−4</sup> for <span><math><msup><mi>K</mi><mi>trans</mi></msup></math></span>, <span><math><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>p</mi></msub></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mi>v</mi><mi>e</mi></msub></math></span>, respectively, with no significant difference from NLLS(<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05), while reducing computational time from 15 min to 17 s. External validation demonstrated consistent performance across scanner and institutions. CNN<sub>CON</sub> showed 2-3× better accuracy than AIF-TK Net and equivalent diagnostic capability for tumor grading (AUC = 0.89). Correlation with NLLS exceed 0.97 in normal tissues. The concentration-based approach provides superior robustness to protocol variations, validated across multiple centers, enabling consistent application of perfusion imaging biomarkers in clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18165,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 110559"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic resonance imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X25002437","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is common technique for assessing tissue perfusion and permeability in brain tumors (e.g., gliomas), using generalized tracer kinetic (GTK) analysis. However, conventional non-linear least squares (NLLS) methods are computationally expensive and sensitive to noise and protocol variations (e.g., temporal resolution, flip angle), leading to inconsistent parameter estimates. Most recent deep learning methods use signal-intensity and pre-contrast T1, without addressing acquisition protocol variation effects. We propose CNNCON, a concentration curve-based convolutional neural network-based approach for GTK parameter estimation, designed to adapt to various DCE-MRI protocols with faster processing and investigate its accuracy and robustness to protocol variations. CNNCON was trained on synthetic data with protocol variations, and fine-tuned on 72 glioma patients(grade 2–4). Validation was performed on 18 test patients and two external datasets: cross-scanner(n = 9, 1.5 T) and cross-institutional(n = 6, different hospital). Performance was compared against NLLS and AIF-TK Net. CNNCON achieved mean absolute errors of 111 ± 70 × 10−5 min−1, 134 ± 53 × 10−5, and 133 ± 57 × 10−4 for Ktrans, vp and ve, respectively, with no significant difference from NLLS(p > 0.05), while reducing computational time from 15 min to 17 s. External validation demonstrated consistent performance across scanner and institutions. CNNCON showed 2-3× better accuracy than AIF-TK Net and equivalent diagnostic capability for tumor grading (AUC = 0.89). Correlation with NLLS exceed 0.97 in normal tissues. The concentration-based approach provides superior robustness to protocol variations, validated across multiple centers, enabling consistent application of perfusion imaging biomarkers in clinical practice.
DCE-MRI参数估计的深度学习方法:评估信号强度和基于浓度-时间曲线的卷积神经网络。
动态对比增强MRI (DCE-MRI)是评估脑肿瘤(如胶质瘤)组织灌注和通透性的常用技术,使用广义示踪动力学(GTK)分析。然而,传统的非线性最小二乘(NLLS)方法计算成本高,对噪声和协议变化(例如,时间分辨率,翻转角度)敏感,导致参数估计不一致。最近的深度学习方法使用信号强度和预对比T1,没有解决采集协议变化的影响。我们提出了CNNCON,一种基于浓度曲线的卷积神经网络的GTK参数估计方法,旨在以更快的处理速度适应各种DCE-MRI协议,并研究其对协议变化的准确性和鲁棒性。CNNCON是在方案变化的合成数据上进行训练的,并对72例胶质瘤患者(2-4级)进行了微调。对18名试验患者和两个外部数据集进行验证:跨扫描仪(n = 9,1.5 T)和跨机构(n = 6,不同医院)。与nls和AIF-TK Net进行性能比较。CNNCON实现111年平均绝对误差 ±70  × 纯 最低为1,134 ± 53 × 纯,和133年 ± 57 ×4 打败Ktrans, vp和ve、分别从附近无显著差异(p > 0.05),同时减少计算时间从15 分钟17 年代。外部验证证明了扫描仪和机构之间一致的性能。CNNCON的准确率比AIF-TK Net高2-3倍,具有同等的肿瘤分级诊断能力(AUC = 0.89)。正常组织与NLLS的相关性超过0.97。正常组织与NLLS的相关性超过0.97。基于浓度的方法为方案变化提供了卓越的稳健性,在多个中心验证,使灌注成像生物标志物在临床实践中的一致应用成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic resonance imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the first international multidisciplinary journal encompassing physical, life, and clinical science investigations as they relate to the development and use of magnetic resonance imaging. MRI is dedicated to both basic research, technological innovation and applications, providing a single forum for communication among radiologists, physicists, chemists, biochemists, biologists, engineers, internists, pathologists, physiologists, computer scientists, and mathematicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书