Kim Z. Travis , Richard W. Lewis , Christine Barreau , Bastian Becker , Philippe F. Kennel
{"title":"Applicability of kinetically-based maximum dose studies for hazard and risk assessments of the fungicide fluoxapiprolin","authors":"Kim Z. Travis , Richard W. Lewis , Christine Barreau , Bastian Becker , Philippe F. Kennel","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fluoxapiprolin is a new fungicide developed for the control of oomycetes that damage crops such as tomato, potato, grapes and leafy vegetables. Human safety studies have shown no toxicity clearly attributable to fluoxapiprolin, highlighting its favourable toxicological profile compared to many other fungicides. It meets all human health risk assessment criteria without difficulty. However, fluoxapiprolin was tested up to a Kinetically-Derived Maximum Dose (KMD) rather than the conventional limit dose, making it necessary to justify this approach in the context of regulatory hazard assessment. Official guidance documents encourage the application of KMD approaches under specific conditions. In the case of fluoxapiprolin, oral absorption was shown to become saturated as doses increased, supporting the selection of the high dose in long-term studies based on a KMD rather than using a fixed limit dose. Even if a limit dose had been used, systemic exposure would have been only about twice as high as that observed at the KMD. Given the absence of treatment-related toxicity in any study and the relatively small difference in systemic exposure, the toxicological database is considered sufficient to identify relevant hazards and to support a robust human health risk assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 105983"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025002156","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Fluoxapiprolin is a new fungicide developed for the control of oomycetes that damage crops such as tomato, potato, grapes and leafy vegetables. Human safety studies have shown no toxicity clearly attributable to fluoxapiprolin, highlighting its favourable toxicological profile compared to many other fungicides. It meets all human health risk assessment criteria without difficulty. However, fluoxapiprolin was tested up to a Kinetically-Derived Maximum Dose (KMD) rather than the conventional limit dose, making it necessary to justify this approach in the context of regulatory hazard assessment. Official guidance documents encourage the application of KMD approaches under specific conditions. In the case of fluoxapiprolin, oral absorption was shown to become saturated as doses increased, supporting the selection of the high dose in long-term studies based on a KMD rather than using a fixed limit dose. Even if a limit dose had been used, systemic exposure would have been only about twice as high as that observed at the KMD. Given the absence of treatment-related toxicity in any study and the relatively small difference in systemic exposure, the toxicological database is considered sufficient to identify relevant hazards and to support a robust human health risk assessment.
期刊介绍:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health.
Types of peer-reviewed articles published:
-Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to:
1.Factors influencing human sensitivity
2.Exposure science related to risk assessment
3.Alternative toxicological test methods
4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations
5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies
6.Read-across methods and evaluations
-Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues
-Letters to the Editor
-Guest Editorials (by Invitation)