Applicability of kinetically-based maximum dose studies for hazard and risk assessments of the fungicide fluoxapiprolin

IF 4.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-06 DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105983
Kim Z. Travis , Richard W. Lewis , Christine Barreau , Bastian Becker , Philippe F. Kennel
{"title":"Applicability of kinetically-based maximum dose studies for hazard and risk assessments of the fungicide fluoxapiprolin","authors":"Kim Z. Travis ,&nbsp;Richard W. Lewis ,&nbsp;Christine Barreau ,&nbsp;Bastian Becker ,&nbsp;Philippe F. Kennel","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fluoxapiprolin is a new fungicide developed for the control of oomycetes that damage crops such as tomato, potato, grapes and leafy vegetables. Human safety studies have shown no toxicity clearly attributable to fluoxapiprolin, highlighting its favourable toxicological profile compared to many other fungicides. It meets all human health risk assessment criteria without difficulty. However, fluoxapiprolin was tested up to a Kinetically-Derived Maximum Dose (KMD) rather than the conventional limit dose, making it necessary to justify this approach in the context of regulatory hazard assessment. Official guidance documents encourage the application of KMD approaches under specific conditions. In the case of fluoxapiprolin, oral absorption was shown to become saturated as doses increased, supporting the selection of the high dose in long-term studies based on a KMD rather than using a fixed limit dose. Even if a limit dose had been used, systemic exposure would have been only about twice as high as that observed at the KMD. Given the absence of treatment-related toxicity in any study and the relatively small difference in systemic exposure, the toxicological database is considered sufficient to identify relevant hazards and to support a robust human health risk assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 105983"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025002156","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fluoxapiprolin is a new fungicide developed for the control of oomycetes that damage crops such as tomato, potato, grapes and leafy vegetables. Human safety studies have shown no toxicity clearly attributable to fluoxapiprolin, highlighting its favourable toxicological profile compared to many other fungicides. It meets all human health risk assessment criteria without difficulty. However, fluoxapiprolin was tested up to a Kinetically-Derived Maximum Dose (KMD) rather than the conventional limit dose, making it necessary to justify this approach in the context of regulatory hazard assessment. Official guidance documents encourage the application of KMD approaches under specific conditions. In the case of fluoxapiprolin, oral absorption was shown to become saturated as doses increased, supporting the selection of the high dose in long-term studies based on a KMD rather than using a fixed limit dose. Even if a limit dose had been used, systemic exposure would have been only about twice as high as that observed at the KMD. Given the absence of treatment-related toxicity in any study and the relatively small difference in systemic exposure, the toxicological database is considered sufficient to identify relevant hazards and to support a robust human health risk assessment.

Abstract Image

基于动力学的最大剂量研究在杀菌剂氟沙匹prolin危害和风险评估中的适用性。
氟沙匹prolin是一种新型杀菌剂,用于控制危害番茄、马铃薯、葡萄和叶菜等作物的卵菌。人体安全性研究表明,氟沙匹prolin没有明显的毒性,与许多其他杀菌剂相比,它具有良好的毒理学特征。它毫无困难地满足所有人类健康风险评估标准。然而,氟沙匹prolin的测试达到了动力学衍生的最大剂量(KMD),而不是传统的极限剂量,因此有必要在监管危害评估的背景下证明这种方法的合理性。官方指导文件鼓励在特定条件下应用KMD方法。就氟沙匹普罗林而言,口服吸收随着剂量的增加而趋于饱和,这支持在基于KMD的长期研究中选择高剂量,而不是使用固定的极限剂量。即使使用了限制剂量,全身暴露也只会比在KMD观察到的高两倍左右。鉴于在任何研究中都没有发现与治疗有关的毒性,而且全身接触的差异也相对较小,毒理学数据库被认为足以确定相关的危害,并支持进行强有力的人类健康风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health. Types of peer-reviewed articles published: -Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to: 1.Factors influencing human sensitivity 2.Exposure science related to risk assessment 3.Alternative toxicological test methods 4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations 5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies 6.Read-across methods and evaluations -Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues -Letters to the Editor -Guest Editorials (by Invitation)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书