Emadeldin M. Kamel, Noha A. Ahmed, Sarah I. Othman, Adil Abalkhail, Faris F. Aba Alkhayl, Bassam A. Abuamarah, Saleh Maodaa, Al Mokhtar Lamsabhi
{"title":"Multi-scale In Silico and Biochemical Evaluation of Natural Bisbenzylisoquinoline Alkaloids as Aldose Reductase Inhibitors","authors":"Emadeldin M. Kamel, Noha A. Ahmed, Sarah I. Othman, Adil Abalkhail, Faris F. Aba Alkhayl, Bassam A. Abuamarah, Saleh Maodaa, Al Mokhtar Lamsabhi","doi":"10.1007/s10930-025-10297-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Aldose reductase (AR) is the rate-limiting enzyme of the polyol pathway and a validated target for preventing micro- and neurovascular complications of diabetes. Here, we combined multi-scale in-silico analyses with biochemical testing to evaluate five commercially available bisbenzylisoquinoline alkaloids—cepharanthine, dauricine, isotetrandrine, fangchinoline and sinomenine—as potential AR inhibitors. Density-functional optimization, structure-based docking and 500 ns molecular-dynamics simulations revealed that the macrocyclic scaffolds of cepharanthine (ΔG<sub>dock</sub> = − 8.4 kcal mol<sup>−1</sup>) and dauricine (− 9.7 kcal mol<sup>−1</sup>) fully occupy the Phe122-Trp219-Trp111 aromatic cage and lock AR into a single, deep free-energy basin, whereas sinomenine explores a broad landscape. MM/PBSA calculations on the 150–200 ns of each trajectory ranked binding free energies as dauricine ≈ isotetrandrine ≈ cepharanthine < sinomenine < fangchinoline, with van-der-Waals forces dominating. ADMET profiling predicted high gastrointestinal absorption across the series but flagged a potential hERG potassium-channel liability for the four macrocycles. Enzyme-kinetic assays corroborated the computational hierarchy: cepharanthine, dauricine and isotetrandrine inhibited recombinant AR with IC<sub>50</sub> values of 4.25 ± 0.42, 5.38 ± 0.22 and 6.65 ± 0.40 µM, respectively, compared with 2.36 ± 0.32 µM for quercetin. Lineweaver–Burk and Michaelis–Menten analysis showed mixed inhibition for cepharanthine (<i>K</i><sub>i</sub> = 3.71 µM) and non-competitive inhibition for dauricine (<i>K</i><sub>i</sub> = 4.63 µM) and isotetrandrine (<i>K</i><sub>i</sub> = 6.99 µM). Fangchinoline and sinomenine were an order of magnitude weaker (IC<sub>50</sub> = 37–57 µM). Taken together, these data position cepharanthine and dauricine as mechanistically validated, hit-stage starting points for next-generation AR inhibitors, and identify isotetrandrine as an allosteric back-up scaffold. More broadly, the study illustrates a transparent, reproducible computational–experimental workflow for prioritizing structurally complex natural products against redox enzymes implicated in diabetic pathology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":793,"journal":{"name":"The Protein Journal","volume":"45 1","pages":"125 - 145"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Protein Journal","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10930-025-10297-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aldose reductase (AR) is the rate-limiting enzyme of the polyol pathway and a validated target for preventing micro- and neurovascular complications of diabetes. Here, we combined multi-scale in-silico analyses with biochemical testing to evaluate five commercially available bisbenzylisoquinoline alkaloids—cepharanthine, dauricine, isotetrandrine, fangchinoline and sinomenine—as potential AR inhibitors. Density-functional optimization, structure-based docking and 500 ns molecular-dynamics simulations revealed that the macrocyclic scaffolds of cepharanthine (ΔGdock = − 8.4 kcal mol−1) and dauricine (− 9.7 kcal mol−1) fully occupy the Phe122-Trp219-Trp111 aromatic cage and lock AR into a single, deep free-energy basin, whereas sinomenine explores a broad landscape. MM/PBSA calculations on the 150–200 ns of each trajectory ranked binding free energies as dauricine ≈ isotetrandrine ≈ cepharanthine < sinomenine < fangchinoline, with van-der-Waals forces dominating. ADMET profiling predicted high gastrointestinal absorption across the series but flagged a potential hERG potassium-channel liability for the four macrocycles. Enzyme-kinetic assays corroborated the computational hierarchy: cepharanthine, dauricine and isotetrandrine inhibited recombinant AR with IC50 values of 4.25 ± 0.42, 5.38 ± 0.22 and 6.65 ± 0.40 µM, respectively, compared with 2.36 ± 0.32 µM for quercetin. Lineweaver–Burk and Michaelis–Menten analysis showed mixed inhibition for cepharanthine (Ki = 3.71 µM) and non-competitive inhibition for dauricine (Ki = 4.63 µM) and isotetrandrine (Ki = 6.99 µM). Fangchinoline and sinomenine were an order of magnitude weaker (IC50 = 37–57 µM). Taken together, these data position cepharanthine and dauricine as mechanistically validated, hit-stage starting points for next-generation AR inhibitors, and identify isotetrandrine as an allosteric back-up scaffold. More broadly, the study illustrates a transparent, reproducible computational–experimental workflow for prioritizing structurally complex natural products against redox enzymes implicated in diabetic pathology.
期刊介绍:
The Protein Journal (formerly the Journal of Protein Chemistry) publishes original research work on all aspects of proteins and peptides. These include studies concerned with covalent or three-dimensional structure determination (X-ray, NMR, cryoEM, EPR/ESR, optical methods, etc.), computational aspects of protein structure and function, protein folding and misfolding, assembly, genetics, evolution, proteomics, molecular biology, protein engineering, protein nanotechnology, protein purification and analysis and peptide synthesis, as well as the elucidation and interpretation of the molecular bases of biological activities of proteins and peptides. We accept original research papers, reviews, mini-reviews, hypotheses, opinion papers, and letters to the editor.