Techno-enviro-socio-economic assessment and sensitivity analysis of an off-grid Tidal/Fuel Cell/Electrolyzer/Photovoltaic hybrid system for hydrogen and electricity production in Cameroon coastal areas

Fuel Communications Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jfueco.2025.100150
Pascalin Tiam Kapen
{"title":"Techno-enviro-socio-economic assessment and sensitivity analysis of an off-grid Tidal/Fuel Cell/Electrolyzer/Photovoltaic hybrid system for hydrogen and electricity production in Cameroon coastal areas","authors":"Pascalin Tiam Kapen","doi":"10.1016/j.jfueco.2025.100150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Coastal regions in Cameroon, including Douala, Kribi, Campo, Dibamba, and Limbe, faced persistent electricity challenges driven by grid instability, growing demand, and dependence on fossil fuels. Solar resource availability was high but intermittent, whereas tidal energy was predictable and energy-dense yet underused. This pilot delivers the first Cameroonian assessment of an off-grid tidal/PV/electrolyzer/hydrogen-storage/fuel-cell architecture, explicitly co-optimizing electricity service and green hydrogen production, and evaluating performance with a tri-metric economic lens (net present cost, levelized cost of electricity, and the levelized cost of hydrogen). The system was optimized to minimize net present cost (NPC), levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) and three tidal-flow scenarios were analyzed to represent hydrokinetic variability. The design served households, small businesses, fishing activities, schools, and health facilities with a baseline demand of 389.50 kWh/day; surplus renewable power drove the electrolyzer to produce hydrogen for later reconversion in the fuel cell. Under the first scenario (1.25 m/s average speed), the optimal mix comprised 137 PV modules (600 W each), a 100 kW fuel cell, six 40 kW tidal turbines, six 10 kW electrolyzers, a 19.5 kW converter, and 41 hydrogen tanks (40 L each), yielding an NPC of US$ 2.16 million, an LCOE of US$ 0.782/kWh, and a LCOH of US$ 19.2/kg of hydrogen. The second scenario (1.47 m/s) required only 12 PV modules, one electrolyzer, and an 11.3 kW converter, lowering costs to an NPC of US$ 1.52 million, an LCOE of US$ 0.553/kWh, and a LCOH of US$ 15.4/kg of hydrogen. In the third scenario (1.61 m/s), the configuration shifted to 298 PV modules, three tidal turbines, eight electrolyzers, and a 39.6 kW converter, resulting in the highest NPC (US$ 2.47 million) and LCOE (US$ 0.901/kWh), with a LCOH of US$ 18.8/kg of hydrogen. The study also contributes a transparent, component-wise employment indicator linking installed capacities/energies to jobs; deployment is expected to create about seven local jobs during installation and early operation, tidal turbines (3), solar panels (1), electrolyzers (1), hydrogen tanks (1), and fuel cell (1), with additional minor operation and maintenance positions thereafter. Social analysis indicated improved energy access, support for local livelihoods, and job creation; environmental results confirmed clean operation with limited marine disturbance. A sensitivity study varying capital and replacement-cost multipliers showed robust performance across economic conditions. Taken together, these contributions provide a decision-ready blueprint for coastal communities: a first-of-its-kind Cameroonian hybrid that quantifies both electricity and hydrogen costs (including feasible LCOH) and demonstrates socio-economic co-benefits, offering a cost-effective pathway to strengthen energy security, foster local development, and reduce environmental impact.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100556,"journal":{"name":"Fuel Communications","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 100150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fuel Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666052025000184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coastal regions in Cameroon, including Douala, Kribi, Campo, Dibamba, and Limbe, faced persistent electricity challenges driven by grid instability, growing demand, and dependence on fossil fuels. Solar resource availability was high but intermittent, whereas tidal energy was predictable and energy-dense yet underused. This pilot delivers the first Cameroonian assessment of an off-grid tidal/PV/electrolyzer/hydrogen-storage/fuel-cell architecture, explicitly co-optimizing electricity service and green hydrogen production, and evaluating performance with a tri-metric economic lens (net present cost, levelized cost of electricity, and the levelized cost of hydrogen). The system was optimized to minimize net present cost (NPC), levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) and three tidal-flow scenarios were analyzed to represent hydrokinetic variability. The design served households, small businesses, fishing activities, schools, and health facilities with a baseline demand of 389.50 kWh/day; surplus renewable power drove the electrolyzer to produce hydrogen for later reconversion in the fuel cell. Under the first scenario (1.25 m/s average speed), the optimal mix comprised 137 PV modules (600 W each), a 100 kW fuel cell, six 40 kW tidal turbines, six 10 kW electrolyzers, a 19.5 kW converter, and 41 hydrogen tanks (40 L each), yielding an NPC of US$ 2.16 million, an LCOE of US$ 0.782/kWh, and a LCOH of US$ 19.2/kg of hydrogen. The second scenario (1.47 m/s) required only 12 PV modules, one electrolyzer, and an 11.3 kW converter, lowering costs to an NPC of US$ 1.52 million, an LCOE of US$ 0.553/kWh, and a LCOH of US$ 15.4/kg of hydrogen. In the third scenario (1.61 m/s), the configuration shifted to 298 PV modules, three tidal turbines, eight electrolyzers, and a 39.6 kW converter, resulting in the highest NPC (US$ 2.47 million) and LCOE (US$ 0.901/kWh), with a LCOH of US$ 18.8/kg of hydrogen. The study also contributes a transparent, component-wise employment indicator linking installed capacities/energies to jobs; deployment is expected to create about seven local jobs during installation and early operation, tidal turbines (3), solar panels (1), electrolyzers (1), hydrogen tanks (1), and fuel cell (1), with additional minor operation and maintenance positions thereafter. Social analysis indicated improved energy access, support for local livelihoods, and job creation; environmental results confirmed clean operation with limited marine disturbance. A sensitivity study varying capital and replacement-cost multipliers showed robust performance across economic conditions. Taken together, these contributions provide a decision-ready blueprint for coastal communities: a first-of-its-kind Cameroonian hybrid that quantifies both electricity and hydrogen costs (including feasible LCOH) and demonstrates socio-economic co-benefits, offering a cost-effective pathway to strengthen energy security, foster local development, and reduce environmental impact.
喀麦隆沿海地区用于氢气和电力生产的离网潮汐/燃料电池/电解槽/光伏混合系统的技术-环境-社会经济评估和敏感性分析
喀麦隆的沿海地区,包括杜阿拉、克里比、坎波、迪班巴和林贝,由于电网不稳定、需求不断增长和对化石燃料的依赖,面临着持续的电力挑战。太阳能资源的可用性很高,但断断续续,而潮汐能是可预测的,能量密集,但未得到充分利用。该试点项目首次在喀麦隆对离网潮汐/光伏/电解槽/储氢/燃料电池体系结构进行了评估,明确地对电力服务和绿色制氢进行了协同优化,并采用三指标经济视角(净现值成本、电力成本和氢气成本)对性能进行了评估。对系统进行优化,以最小化净当前成本(NPC)、平准化电力成本(LCOE)、平准化氢成本(LCOH),并分析了三种潮汐流情景,以表示水动力学变异性。该设计服务于家庭、小型企业、渔业活动、学校和卫生设施,基线需求为389.50千瓦时/天;剩余的可再生能源驱动电解槽产生氢气,稍后在燃料电池中进行再转化。在第一种情况下(平均速度为1.25米/秒),最佳组合包括137个光伏组件(每个600瓦),一个100千瓦的燃料电池,6个40千瓦的潮汐涡轮机,6个10千瓦的电解槽,一个19.5千瓦的转换器和41个氢罐(每个40升),产生的NPC为216万美元,LCOE为0.782美元/千瓦时,LCOH为19.2美元/千克氢。第二种方案(1.47米/秒)只需要12个光伏组件,一个电解槽和一个11.3千瓦的转换器,将成本降低到NPC 152万美元,LCOE为0.553美元/千瓦时,LCOH为15.4美元/千克氢。在第三种方案(1.61米/秒)中,配置转变为298个光伏组件,3个潮汐涡轮机,8个电解槽和一个39.6千瓦的转换器,产生最高的NPC(249万美元)和LCOE(0.901美元/千瓦时),LCOH为18.8美元/千克氢。该研究还提供了一个透明的、明智的就业指标,将装机容量/能源与就业联系起来;在安装和早期操作期间,预计将在当地创造约7个工作岗位,包括潮汐涡轮机(3个)、太阳能电池板(1个)、电解槽(1个)、氢罐(1个)和燃料电池(1个),以及随后的小型操作和维护岗位。社会分析表明,能源获取得到改善,支持了当地生计,创造了就业机会;环境测试结果证实了清洁作业,海洋干扰有限。一项敏感性研究表明,在不同的经济条件下,不同的资本和替代成本乘数表现出强劲的表现。综上所述,这些贡献为沿海社区提供了一个现成的决策蓝图:这是喀麦隆首个将电力和氢成本(包括可行的LCOH)量化并展示社会经济协同效益的混合能源,为加强能源安全、促进当地发展和减少环境影响提供了一条具有成本效益的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书