Christopher J. Bowman , Ann Baker , Diann L. Blanset , Kimberly C. Brannen , Gary J. Chellman , Brian Enright , Wendy Halpern , Bethany R. Hannas , Kazushige Maki , Fumito Mikashima , Shermaine Mitchell-Ryan , Eve Mylchreest , Manjunatha K. Nanjappa , Helen Prior , Puck Roos , Dinesh Stanislaus , Angela R. Stermer , Jane Stewart , Katie Turner , Steven van Cruchten , Peter Theunissen
{"title":"Minimizing use of nonhuman primates to inform risk to fertility and of adverse pregnancy outcomes with pharmaceuticals","authors":"Christopher J. Bowman , Ann Baker , Diann L. Blanset , Kimberly C. Brannen , Gary J. Chellman , Brian Enright , Wendy Halpern , Bethany R. Hannas , Kazushige Maki , Fumito Mikashima , Shermaine Mitchell-Ryan , Eve Mylchreest , Manjunatha K. Nanjappa , Helen Prior , Puck Roos , Dinesh Stanislaus , Angela R. Stermer , Jane Stewart , Katie Turner , Steven van Cruchten , Peter Theunissen","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>An assessment of potential developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) is generally required to support clinical trials and marketing of pharmaceuticals. Although typically performed in rodents and rabbits, nonhuman primates (NHPs) are often used when they are the only pharmacologically relevant species. Regulatory guidances allow for weight of evidence (WoE) risk assessment for DART such that mature NHPs may not be needed to confirm expected or low risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. As such, there are numerous examples of WoE strategies to inform risk of adverse pregnancy outcome, but fewer to assess risk to male and/or female fertility, although emerging data indicate mature NHPs have limited impact on fertility risk assessment in product labels. Mature NHP data are most impactful to fill safety gaps when there are no relevant data from other species, limited information to establish WoE, and/or limited human data is available to characterize risk. In this review, we propose a detailed decision tree and examples to inform risk of adverse pregnancy outcome or male/female fertility impact by emphasizing and prioritizing WoE supplemented by experimental data where necessary, including use of NHPs as a last resort. Additional refinements to NHP use are also summarized.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 105971"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027323002500203X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
An assessment of potential developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) is generally required to support clinical trials and marketing of pharmaceuticals. Although typically performed in rodents and rabbits, nonhuman primates (NHPs) are often used when they are the only pharmacologically relevant species. Regulatory guidances allow for weight of evidence (WoE) risk assessment for DART such that mature NHPs may not be needed to confirm expected or low risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. As such, there are numerous examples of WoE strategies to inform risk of adverse pregnancy outcome, but fewer to assess risk to male and/or female fertility, although emerging data indicate mature NHPs have limited impact on fertility risk assessment in product labels. Mature NHP data are most impactful to fill safety gaps when there are no relevant data from other species, limited information to establish WoE, and/or limited human data is available to characterize risk. In this review, we propose a detailed decision tree and examples to inform risk of adverse pregnancy outcome or male/female fertility impact by emphasizing and prioritizing WoE supplemented by experimental data where necessary, including use of NHPs as a last resort. Additional refinements to NHP use are also summarized.
期刊介绍:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health.
Types of peer-reviewed articles published:
-Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to:
1.Factors influencing human sensitivity
2.Exposure science related to risk assessment
3.Alternative toxicological test methods
4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations
5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies
6.Read-across methods and evaluations
-Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues
-Letters to the Editor
-Guest Editorials (by Invitation)