Minimizing use of nonhuman primates to inform risk to fertility and of adverse pregnancy outcomes with pharmaceuticals

IF 4.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-24 DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105971
Christopher J. Bowman , Ann Baker , Diann L. Blanset , Kimberly C. Brannen , Gary J. Chellman , Brian Enright , Wendy Halpern , Bethany R. Hannas , Kazushige Maki , Fumito Mikashima , Shermaine Mitchell-Ryan , Eve Mylchreest , Manjunatha K. Nanjappa , Helen Prior , Puck Roos , Dinesh Stanislaus , Angela R. Stermer , Jane Stewart , Katie Turner , Steven van Cruchten , Peter Theunissen
{"title":"Minimizing use of nonhuman primates to inform risk to fertility and of adverse pregnancy outcomes with pharmaceuticals","authors":"Christopher J. Bowman ,&nbsp;Ann Baker ,&nbsp;Diann L. Blanset ,&nbsp;Kimberly C. Brannen ,&nbsp;Gary J. Chellman ,&nbsp;Brian Enright ,&nbsp;Wendy Halpern ,&nbsp;Bethany R. Hannas ,&nbsp;Kazushige Maki ,&nbsp;Fumito Mikashima ,&nbsp;Shermaine Mitchell-Ryan ,&nbsp;Eve Mylchreest ,&nbsp;Manjunatha K. Nanjappa ,&nbsp;Helen Prior ,&nbsp;Puck Roos ,&nbsp;Dinesh Stanislaus ,&nbsp;Angela R. Stermer ,&nbsp;Jane Stewart ,&nbsp;Katie Turner ,&nbsp;Steven van Cruchten ,&nbsp;Peter Theunissen","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>An assessment of potential developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) is generally required to support clinical trials and marketing of pharmaceuticals. Although typically performed in rodents and rabbits, nonhuman primates (NHPs) are often used when they are the only pharmacologically relevant species. Regulatory guidances allow for weight of evidence (WoE) risk assessment for DART such that mature NHPs may not be needed to confirm expected or low risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. As such, there are numerous examples of WoE strategies to inform risk of adverse pregnancy outcome, but fewer to assess risk to male and/or female fertility, although emerging data indicate mature NHPs have limited impact on fertility risk assessment in product labels. Mature NHP data are most impactful to fill safety gaps when there are no relevant data from other species, limited information to establish WoE, and/or limited human data is available to characterize risk. In this review, we propose a detailed decision tree and examples to inform risk of adverse pregnancy outcome or male/female fertility impact by emphasizing and prioritizing WoE supplemented by experimental data where necessary, including use of NHPs as a last resort. Additional refinements to NHP use are also summarized.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 105971"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027323002500203X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An assessment of potential developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) is generally required to support clinical trials and marketing of pharmaceuticals. Although typically performed in rodents and rabbits, nonhuman primates (NHPs) are often used when they are the only pharmacologically relevant species. Regulatory guidances allow for weight of evidence (WoE) risk assessment for DART such that mature NHPs may not be needed to confirm expected or low risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. As such, there are numerous examples of WoE strategies to inform risk of adverse pregnancy outcome, but fewer to assess risk to male and/or female fertility, although emerging data indicate mature NHPs have limited impact on fertility risk assessment in product labels. Mature NHP data are most impactful to fill safety gaps when there are no relevant data from other species, limited information to establish WoE, and/or limited human data is available to characterize risk. In this review, we propose a detailed decision tree and examples to inform risk of adverse pregnancy outcome or male/female fertility impact by emphasizing and prioritizing WoE supplemented by experimental data where necessary, including use of NHPs as a last resort. Additional refinements to NHP use are also summarized.
尽量减少使用非人类灵长类动物来告知生育风险和药物不良妊娠结局
通常需要对潜在的发育和生殖毒性(DART)进行评估,以支持药物的临床试验和销售。虽然通常在啮齿动物和兔子中进行,但当它们是唯一的药理学相关物种时,通常使用非人灵长类动物(NHPs)。监管指南允许对DART进行证据权重(WoE)风险评估,因此可能不需要成熟的NHPs来确认预期或低风险的不良妊娠结局。因此,尽管新出现的数据表明,成熟的NHPs对产品标签上的生育风险评估影响有限,但有许多用于告知不良妊娠结局风险的WoE策略的例子,但用于评估男性和/或女性生育风险的例子较少。当没有来自其他物种的相关数据、建立疾病风险的信息有限和/或可用于表征风险的人类数据有限时,成熟的非传染性疾病数据对填补安全空白最具影响力。在这篇综述中,我们提出了一个详细的决策树和例子,通过强调和优先考虑WoE,并在必要时辅以实验数据,包括将NHPs作为最后的手段,来告知不良妊娠结局或男性/女性生育影响的风险。还总结了NHP使用的其他改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health. Types of peer-reviewed articles published: -Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to: 1.Factors influencing human sensitivity 2.Exposure science related to risk assessment 3.Alternative toxicological test methods 4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations 5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies 6.Read-across methods and evaluations -Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues -Letters to the Editor -Guest Editorials (by Invitation)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书