The role of after-school programs in supporting social and emotional learning: A synthesis of systematic reviews

Q1 Social Sciences
Lisanne Jilink , Paul Leseman , Pauline Slot , Mirjam Gevers
{"title":"The role of after-school programs in supporting social and emotional learning: A synthesis of systematic reviews","authors":"Lisanne Jilink ,&nbsp;Paul Leseman ,&nbsp;Pauline Slot ,&nbsp;Mirjam Gevers","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedro.2025.100546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>After-school programs (ASPs) offer inclusive, developmentally rich environments that can help close developmental gaps and promote equitable learning opportunities for all children. Given increasing participation in ASPs and the critical role of social and emotional learning (SEL) in long-term outcomes, a comprehensive synthesis of their effectiveness in promoting SEL is warranted. This umbrella review examined systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the impact of ASPs on SEL among children aged 4–12, focusing on program characteristics, contexts, and target populations.</div><div>A systematic search across four databases (Web of Science, PsycINFO, ERIC, and Scopus) in December 2024 yielded ten eligible reviews. Studies included in these reviews assessed structured programs delivered outside regular school hours and curriculum. The reviews covered both general ASPs (e.g., academic and recreational programs) and content-specific extracurricular activities (e.g., STEM, music).</div><div>Seven reviews on general ASPs reported small but positive effects on SEL domains such as self-perception, prosocial behavior, and identity development. Program quality, design (e.g., experiential learning), duration, delivery context, and implementation fidelity emerged as key moderators of effectiveness. However, methodological limitations and inconsistent reporting constrained conclusions. Three reviews of content-specific activities reported consistent SEL benefits—particularly in identity formation, social skills, and perseverance—when programs featured hands-on learning, strong peer and adult-child relationships, and culturally responsive content.</div><div>Findings suggest ASPs can meaningfully promote SEL with differentiated program design and implementation strategies that reflect children's backgrounds, interests, and needs. Future research should prioritize interest-driven approaches, comprehensive program, and rigorous evaluation methods to identify best practices across diverse contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73445,"journal":{"name":"International journal of educational research open","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100546"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of educational research open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374025001104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After-school programs (ASPs) offer inclusive, developmentally rich environments that can help close developmental gaps and promote equitable learning opportunities for all children. Given increasing participation in ASPs and the critical role of social and emotional learning (SEL) in long-term outcomes, a comprehensive synthesis of their effectiveness in promoting SEL is warranted. This umbrella review examined systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the impact of ASPs on SEL among children aged 4–12, focusing on program characteristics, contexts, and target populations.
A systematic search across four databases (Web of Science, PsycINFO, ERIC, and Scopus) in December 2024 yielded ten eligible reviews. Studies included in these reviews assessed structured programs delivered outside regular school hours and curriculum. The reviews covered both general ASPs (e.g., academic and recreational programs) and content-specific extracurricular activities (e.g., STEM, music).
Seven reviews on general ASPs reported small but positive effects on SEL domains such as self-perception, prosocial behavior, and identity development. Program quality, design (e.g., experiential learning), duration, delivery context, and implementation fidelity emerged as key moderators of effectiveness. However, methodological limitations and inconsistent reporting constrained conclusions. Three reviews of content-specific activities reported consistent SEL benefits—particularly in identity formation, social skills, and perseverance—when programs featured hands-on learning, strong peer and adult-child relationships, and culturally responsive content.
Findings suggest ASPs can meaningfully promote SEL with differentiated program design and implementation strategies that reflect children's backgrounds, interests, and needs. Future research should prioritize interest-driven approaches, comprehensive program, and rigorous evaluation methods to identify best practices across diverse contexts.
课后活动在支持社会和情感学习中的作用:系统综述的综合
课后项目提供包容的、有利于发展的环境,有助于缩小发展差距,促进所有儿童获得公平的学习机会。考虑到越来越多的人参与asp,以及社会和情绪学习(SEL)在长期结果中的关键作用,有必要全面综合它们在促进SEL方面的有效性。本综述对4-12岁儿童的asp对SEL的影响进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,重点关注项目特点、背景和目标人群。在2024年12月对四个数据库(Web of Science、PsycINFO、ERIC和Scopus)进行了系统搜索,得到了10篇合格的评论。这些审查中包括的研究评估了在正常上课时间和课程之外提供的结构化课程。审查涵盖了一般的asp(例如,学术和娱乐项目)和特定内容的课外活动(例如,STEM,音乐)。七篇关于一般asp的综述报告了对SEL领域(如自我感知、亲社会行为和身份发展)的小而积极的影响。项目质量、设计(例如,体验式学习)、持续时间、交付环境和实现保真度成为影响有效性的关键因素。然而,方法的局限性和不一致的报告限制了结论。对特定内容活动的三篇评论报告了一致的SEL益处,特别是在身份形成、社交技能和毅力方面,当项目以实践学习、牢固的同伴和成人-儿童关系以及文化响应内容为特色时。研究结果表明,通过反映儿童背景、兴趣和需求的差异化项目设计和实施策略,asp可以有效地促进SEL的发展。未来的研究应优先考虑利益驱动的方法,全面的计划和严格的评估方法,以确定在不同背景下的最佳实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书