{"title":"Quantitative evaluation of vacuum conditions for void removal in flip-chip underfill encapsulation","authors":"Seonghyeon Kim , Sanghyun Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.jsamd.2025.101035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Void formation during underfill encapsulation remains a critical reliability challenge in flip-chip semiconductor packaging. This study quantitatively evaluates the effectiveness of vacuum-assisted degassing in eliminating entrapped voids within the underfill layer. The void-removal process was directly visualized during vacuum treatment, and image-based quantitative analysis was employed to assess degassing performance under well-controlled vacuum conditions. Experiments were conducted at three vacuum pressures (−0.03, −0.06, and −0.09 MPa) and holding times (1, 3, and 5 min), using the void-area fraction as the key performance metric. The results indicate that vacuum pressure is the primary factor governing void removal. A size-dependent behavior was observed, where larger voids responded more effectively to higher pressure differentials. To examine viscosity-related effects, three commercial underfill materials with distinct rheological properties were tested under identical vacuum conditions. Despite differences in viscosity, all materials achieved comparable final void-area fractions after degassing, suggesting that, under sufficiently strong vacuum and adequate holding time, material viscosity exerts a minimal influence on the overall void-removal efficiency. These findings provide quantitative insight for optimizing underfill processes by prioritizing vacuum conditions, thereby enhancing packaging reliability through improved void control.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17219,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices","volume":"10 4","pages":"Article 101035"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468217925001881","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Void formation during underfill encapsulation remains a critical reliability challenge in flip-chip semiconductor packaging. This study quantitatively evaluates the effectiveness of vacuum-assisted degassing in eliminating entrapped voids within the underfill layer. The void-removal process was directly visualized during vacuum treatment, and image-based quantitative analysis was employed to assess degassing performance under well-controlled vacuum conditions. Experiments were conducted at three vacuum pressures (−0.03, −0.06, and −0.09 MPa) and holding times (1, 3, and 5 min), using the void-area fraction as the key performance metric. The results indicate that vacuum pressure is the primary factor governing void removal. A size-dependent behavior was observed, where larger voids responded more effectively to higher pressure differentials. To examine viscosity-related effects, three commercial underfill materials with distinct rheological properties were tested under identical vacuum conditions. Despite differences in viscosity, all materials achieved comparable final void-area fractions after degassing, suggesting that, under sufficiently strong vacuum and adequate holding time, material viscosity exerts a minimal influence on the overall void-removal efficiency. These findings provide quantitative insight for optimizing underfill processes by prioritizing vacuum conditions, thereby enhancing packaging reliability through improved void control.
期刊介绍:
In 1985, the Journal of Science was founded as a platform for publishing national and international research papers across various disciplines, including natural sciences, technology, social sciences, and humanities. Over the years, the journal has experienced remarkable growth in terms of quality, size, and scope. Today, it encompasses a diverse range of publications dedicated to academic research.
Considering the rapid expansion of materials science, we are pleased to introduce the Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices. This new addition to our journal series offers researchers an exciting opportunity to publish their work on all aspects of materials science and technology within the esteemed Journal of Science.
With this development, we aim to revolutionize the way research in materials science is expressed and organized, further strengthening our commitment to promoting outstanding research across various scientific and technological fields.