Quantitative evaluation of vacuum conditions for void removal in flip-chip underfill encapsulation

IF 6.9 3区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Seonghyeon Kim , Sanghyun Lee
{"title":"Quantitative evaluation of vacuum conditions for void removal in flip-chip underfill encapsulation","authors":"Seonghyeon Kim ,&nbsp;Sanghyun Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.jsamd.2025.101035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Void formation during underfill encapsulation remains a critical reliability challenge in flip-chip semiconductor packaging. This study quantitatively evaluates the effectiveness of vacuum-assisted degassing in eliminating entrapped voids within the underfill layer. The void-removal process was directly visualized during vacuum treatment, and image-based quantitative analysis was employed to assess degassing performance under well-controlled vacuum conditions. Experiments were conducted at three vacuum pressures (−0.03, −0.06, and −0.09 MPa) and holding times (1, 3, and 5 min), using the void-area fraction as the key performance metric. The results indicate that vacuum pressure is the primary factor governing void removal. A size-dependent behavior was observed, where larger voids responded more effectively to higher pressure differentials. To examine viscosity-related effects, three commercial underfill materials with distinct rheological properties were tested under identical vacuum conditions. Despite differences in viscosity, all materials achieved comparable final void-area fractions after degassing, suggesting that, under sufficiently strong vacuum and adequate holding time, material viscosity exerts a minimal influence on the overall void-removal efficiency. These findings provide quantitative insight for optimizing underfill processes by prioritizing vacuum conditions, thereby enhancing packaging reliability through improved void control.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17219,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices","volume":"10 4","pages":"Article 101035"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468217925001881","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Void formation during underfill encapsulation remains a critical reliability challenge in flip-chip semiconductor packaging. This study quantitatively evaluates the effectiveness of vacuum-assisted degassing in eliminating entrapped voids within the underfill layer. The void-removal process was directly visualized during vacuum treatment, and image-based quantitative analysis was employed to assess degassing performance under well-controlled vacuum conditions. Experiments were conducted at three vacuum pressures (−0.03, −0.06, and −0.09 MPa) and holding times (1, 3, and 5 min), using the void-area fraction as the key performance metric. The results indicate that vacuum pressure is the primary factor governing void removal. A size-dependent behavior was observed, where larger voids responded more effectively to higher pressure differentials. To examine viscosity-related effects, three commercial underfill materials with distinct rheological properties were tested under identical vacuum conditions. Despite differences in viscosity, all materials achieved comparable final void-area fractions after degassing, suggesting that, under sufficiently strong vacuum and adequate holding time, material viscosity exerts a minimal influence on the overall void-removal efficiency. These findings provide quantitative insight for optimizing underfill processes by prioritizing vacuum conditions, thereby enhancing packaging reliability through improved void control.
倒装下填充封装中真空去除空隙条件的定量评价
在倒装半导体封装中,下填充封装过程中的空隙形成仍然是一个关键的可靠性挑战。本研究定量评价了真空辅助脱气在消除下充填层内圈闭空隙方面的有效性。在真空处理过程中直接可视化抽真空过程,并采用基于图像的定量分析来评估在控制良好的真空条件下的脱气性能。实验在三种真空压力(- 0.03、- 0.06和- 0.09 MPa)和保温时间(1,3和5min)下进行,以空隙面积分数作为关键性能指标。结果表明,真空压力是影响真空去除的主要因素。观察到一种与尺寸相关的行为,其中较大的空隙对较高的压差反应更有效。为了检验粘度相关的影响,在相同的真空条件下测试了三种具有不同流变性能的商业下填料。尽管粘度不同,但所有材料脱气后的最终空隙面积分数相当,这表明,在足够强的真空和足够的保温时间下,材料粘度对整体脱气效率的影响最小。这些发现为通过优先考虑真空条件来优化下填充工艺提供了定量的见解,从而通过改进空隙控制来提高包装的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices
Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices Materials Science-Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
2.50%
发文量
88
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: In 1985, the Journal of Science was founded as a platform for publishing national and international research papers across various disciplines, including natural sciences, technology, social sciences, and humanities. Over the years, the journal has experienced remarkable growth in terms of quality, size, and scope. Today, it encompasses a diverse range of publications dedicated to academic research. Considering the rapid expansion of materials science, we are pleased to introduce the Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices. This new addition to our journal series offers researchers an exciting opportunity to publish their work on all aspects of materials science and technology within the esteemed Journal of Science. With this development, we aim to revolutionize the way research in materials science is expressed and organized, further strengthening our commitment to promoting outstanding research across various scientific and technological fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书