An obesity care curriculum improves residents’ self-efficacy and clinical practice habits

IF 5.3
Obesity Pillars Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-30 DOI:10.1016/j.obpill.2025.100223
Marci Laudenslager , Kacey Chae , Sean Tackett , Amanda Bertram , Kimberly A. Gudzune
{"title":"An obesity care curriculum improves residents’ self-efficacy and clinical practice habits","authors":"Marci Laudenslager ,&nbsp;Kacey Chae ,&nbsp;Sean Tackett ,&nbsp;Amanda Bertram ,&nbsp;Kimberly A. Gudzune","doi":"10.1016/j.obpill.2025.100223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Most residency programs lack formal curricula on obesity care leaving physicians unprepared to treat obesity. After conducting a targeted needs assessment, we refined a previously developed online obesity care curriculum and determined its effect on resident physicians’ outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study employed a prospective, non-randomized, pre-post design to evaluate the impact of an online obesity care curriculum on resident physicians' obesity care self-efficacy and frequency of self-reported clinical practice habits. Participants included internal medicine, family medicine, preventive medicine, and internal medicine-pediatrics residents. The curriculum was offered as a standalone experience (‘curriculum only’) or part of a 10-day obesity medicine elective (‘curriculum + elective’). We recruited 45 residents – 33 selected the ‘curriculum only’ and 12 selected the ‘curriculum + elective’ option. We evaluated changes pre/post across 10 obesity care self-efficacy domains (1-not at all confident; 4-very confident) and self-reported frequency of 10 clinical practice habits (1-never; 5-always) among all residents. We used paired t-tests to calculate mean pre/post changes and compared outcomes between the ‘curriculum only’ and ‘curriculum + elective’ groups using unpaired t-tests. Given the multiple comparisons, we considered a statistically significant result if p-value &lt;0.005 (Bonferroni correction).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, residents completed a mean of 9.5 (SD 2.7) of 11 core e-modules. Residents significantly increased self-efficacy and frequency across obesity care domains (p &lt; 0.005); largest increases in frequency were in discussing metabolic-bariatric surgery (mean change 0.8, SD 1.0), behavioral counseling (0.8, SD 1.2), referring to weight management programs (0.7, SD 0.7), and discussing obesity medications (0.6, SD 0.9). No significant differences in pre/post changes were found comparing ‘curriculum only’ to ‘curriculum + elective.’</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This curriculum's positive impact on clinical practice habits is an important precursor that may lead to changes in treatment outcomes for patients with obesity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100977,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Pillars","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100223"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Pillars","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667368125000671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Most residency programs lack formal curricula on obesity care leaving physicians unprepared to treat obesity. After conducting a targeted needs assessment, we refined a previously developed online obesity care curriculum and determined its effect on resident physicians’ outcomes.

Methods

This study employed a prospective, non-randomized, pre-post design to evaluate the impact of an online obesity care curriculum on resident physicians' obesity care self-efficacy and frequency of self-reported clinical practice habits. Participants included internal medicine, family medicine, preventive medicine, and internal medicine-pediatrics residents. The curriculum was offered as a standalone experience (‘curriculum only’) or part of a 10-day obesity medicine elective (‘curriculum + elective’). We recruited 45 residents – 33 selected the ‘curriculum only’ and 12 selected the ‘curriculum + elective’ option. We evaluated changes pre/post across 10 obesity care self-efficacy domains (1-not at all confident; 4-very confident) and self-reported frequency of 10 clinical practice habits (1-never; 5-always) among all residents. We used paired t-tests to calculate mean pre/post changes and compared outcomes between the ‘curriculum only’ and ‘curriculum + elective’ groups using unpaired t-tests. Given the multiple comparisons, we considered a statistically significant result if p-value <0.005 (Bonferroni correction).

Results

Overall, residents completed a mean of 9.5 (SD 2.7) of 11 core e-modules. Residents significantly increased self-efficacy and frequency across obesity care domains (p < 0.005); largest increases in frequency were in discussing metabolic-bariatric surgery (mean change 0.8, SD 1.0), behavioral counseling (0.8, SD 1.2), referring to weight management programs (0.7, SD 0.7), and discussing obesity medications (0.6, SD 0.9). No significant differences in pre/post changes were found comparing ‘curriculum only’ to ‘curriculum + elective.’

Conclusion

This curriculum's positive impact on clinical practice habits is an important precursor that may lead to changes in treatment outcomes for patients with obesity.

Abstract Image

肥胖护理课程提高了住院医师的自我效能感和临床实践习惯
背景:大多数住院医师项目缺乏关于肥胖护理的正式课程,使医生对治疗肥胖毫无准备。在进行了目标需求评估后,我们改进了先前开发的在线肥胖护理课程,并确定了其对住院医师结果的影响。方法本研究采用前瞻性、非随机、岗前设计来评估在线肥胖护理课程对住院医师肥胖护理自我效能感和自我报告临床实践习惯频率的影响。参与者包括内科、家庭医学、预防医学和内科-儿科住院医师。该课程是作为一个独立的体验(“仅课程”)或10天的肥胖医学选修课(“课程+选修课”)的一部分提供的。我们招募了45名住院医生,其中33人选择了“只上课程”,12人选择了“课程+选修课”。我们评估了所有居民在10个肥胖护理自我效能域(1-完全不自信;4-非常自信)和10个临床实践习惯(1-从不;5-总是)的自我报告频率前后的变化。我们使用配对t检验来计算平均前后变化,并使用非配对t检验比较“仅课程”和“课程+选修”组之间的结果。考虑到多重比较,我们认为p值为<;0.005的结果具有统计学意义(Bonferroni校正)。结果总体而言,居民平均完成了11个核心e模块的9.5个(SD 2.7)。住院医师在肥胖护理领域显著提高了自我效能感和频率(p < 0.005);频率增加最多的是讨论代谢减肥手术(平均变化0.8,标准差1.0),行为咨询(0.8,标准差1.2),提到体重管理计划(0.7,标准差0.7),以及讨论肥胖药物(0.6,标准差0.9)。“只修课程”与“课程+选修课”在前后变化方面并无显著差异。结论该课程对临床实践习惯的积极影响可能是导致肥胖患者治疗结果改变的重要前兆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书