Investigation on different strategies of significance testing in ANOVA-simultaneous component analysis (ASCA)

IF 3.8 2区 化学 Q2 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Faezeh Maddahi , Mahsa Akbari Lakeh , Jamile Mohammad Jafari , Farnoosh Koleini , Siewert Hugelier , Paul J. Gemperline , Hamid Abdollahi
{"title":"Investigation on different strategies of significance testing in ANOVA-simultaneous component analysis (ASCA)","authors":"Faezeh Maddahi ,&nbsp;Mahsa Akbari Lakeh ,&nbsp;Jamile Mohammad Jafari ,&nbsp;Farnoosh Koleini ,&nbsp;Siewert Hugelier ,&nbsp;Paul J. Gemperline ,&nbsp;Hamid Abdollahi","doi":"10.1016/j.chemolab.2025.105573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>ANOVA Simultaneous Component Analysis (ASCA) integrates analysis of variance with multivariate modelling to quantify how experimental factors and their interactions affect complex multivariate measurements. Statistical significance in ASCA is typically assessed by permutation testing; however, different permutation strategies imply distinct null hypothesis and exchangeability assumptions. In this study, we systematically compare three widely used approaches embedded in popular chemometric software packages where the permutation strategy is often predefined and not always transparent to the user. The restricted permutation method shuffles observations only within experimental strata, preserving the structure of the null hypothesis. The reduced‐model permutation contrasts the full ASCA model with a simplified version in which selected effects are removed. Permutation of marginal design matrices isolates interaction effects by permuting marginal matrices derived from the design matrix. We evaluate these methods on simulated datasets with varying patterns of main effects and interactions, as well as on an experimental study of feral cabbage (Brassica oleracea) under treatment and time factors. Our results show that the restricted permutation method reliably detects main effects, reduced‐model permutation excels at identifying interactions, and permutation of marginal design matrices consistently captures both. By examining the assumptions and performance of each method, we provide practical guidance for selecting the optimal permutation strategy in ASCA-based chemometric analysis, particularly for balanced experimental designs. As a baseline, we additionally assessed unrestricted permutation of the raw data using two test statistics: the sum of squares and the F-ratio. The results demonstrated that when employing the F-ratio, this approach was also capable of accurately detecting statistical significance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9774,"journal":{"name":"Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems","volume":"268 ","pages":"Article 105573"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169743925002588","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ANOVA Simultaneous Component Analysis (ASCA) integrates analysis of variance with multivariate modelling to quantify how experimental factors and their interactions affect complex multivariate measurements. Statistical significance in ASCA is typically assessed by permutation testing; however, different permutation strategies imply distinct null hypothesis and exchangeability assumptions. In this study, we systematically compare three widely used approaches embedded in popular chemometric software packages where the permutation strategy is often predefined and not always transparent to the user. The restricted permutation method shuffles observations only within experimental strata, preserving the structure of the null hypothesis. The reduced‐model permutation contrasts the full ASCA model with a simplified version in which selected effects are removed. Permutation of marginal design matrices isolates interaction effects by permuting marginal matrices derived from the design matrix. We evaluate these methods on simulated datasets with varying patterns of main effects and interactions, as well as on an experimental study of feral cabbage (Brassica oleracea) under treatment and time factors. Our results show that the restricted permutation method reliably detects main effects, reduced‐model permutation excels at identifying interactions, and permutation of marginal design matrices consistently captures both. By examining the assumptions and performance of each method, we provide practical guidance for selecting the optimal permutation strategy in ASCA-based chemometric analysis, particularly for balanced experimental designs. As a baseline, we additionally assessed unrestricted permutation of the raw data using two test statistics: the sum of squares and the F-ratio. The results demonstrated that when employing the F-ratio, this approach was also capable of accurately detecting statistical significance.
anova -同步成分分析(ASCA)中不同显著性检验策略的探讨
ANOVA同时成分分析(ASCA)将方差分析与多变量建模相结合,量化实验因素及其相互作用如何影响复杂的多变量测量。ASCA的统计显著性通常通过排列测试来评估;然而,不同的排列策略意味着不同的零假设和互换性假设。在这项研究中,我们系统地比较了三种广泛使用的方法,这些方法嵌入在流行的化学计量软件包中,其中排列策略通常是预定义的,并不总是对用户透明。限制排列法只在实验层内打乱观察结果,保留原假设的结构。简化模型排列对比了完整的ASCA模型与简化版本,其中选择的影响被删除。边际设计矩阵的置换通过置换由设计矩阵导出的边际矩阵来隔离交互效应。我们在具有不同主效应和相互作用模式的模拟数据集上评估了这些方法,并在处理和时间因素下对野生卷心菜(芸苔甘蓝)进行了实验研究。我们的研究结果表明,限制排列方法可靠地检测主效应,简化模型排列在识别相互作用方面表现出色,而边缘设计矩阵的排列一致地捕获了两者。通过检查每种方法的假设和性能,我们为基于asca的化学计量分析中选择最佳排列策略提供了实用指导,特别是对于平衡实验设计。作为基线,我们使用两个检验统计量(平方和和f比)额外评估了原始数据的无限制排列。结果表明,当采用f比时,该方法也能够准确地检测统计显著性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
169
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems publishes original research papers, short communications, reviews, tutorials and Original Software Publications reporting on development of novel statistical, mathematical, or computer techniques in Chemistry and related disciplines. Chemometrics is the chemical discipline that uses mathematical and statistical methods to design or select optimal procedures and experiments, and to provide maximum chemical information by analysing chemical data. The journal deals with the following topics: 1) Development of new statistical, mathematical and chemometrical methods for Chemistry and related fields (Environmental Chemistry, Biochemistry, Toxicology, System Biology, -Omics, etc.) 2) Novel applications of chemometrics to all branches of Chemistry and related fields (typical domains of interest are: process data analysis, experimental design, data mining, signal processing, supervised modelling, decision making, robust statistics, mixture analysis, multivariate calibration etc.) Routine applications of established chemometrical techniques will not be considered. 3) Development of new software that provides novel tools or truly advances the use of chemometrical methods. 4) Well characterized data sets to test performance for the new methods and software. The journal complies with International Committee of Medical Journal Editors'' Uniform requirements for manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书