Faezeh Maddahi , Mahsa Akbari Lakeh , Jamile Mohammad Jafari , Farnoosh Koleini , Siewert Hugelier , Paul J. Gemperline , Hamid Abdollahi
{"title":"Investigation on different strategies of significance testing in ANOVA-simultaneous component analysis (ASCA)","authors":"Faezeh Maddahi , Mahsa Akbari Lakeh , Jamile Mohammad Jafari , Farnoosh Koleini , Siewert Hugelier , Paul J. Gemperline , Hamid Abdollahi","doi":"10.1016/j.chemolab.2025.105573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>ANOVA Simultaneous Component Analysis (ASCA) integrates analysis of variance with multivariate modelling to quantify how experimental factors and their interactions affect complex multivariate measurements. Statistical significance in ASCA is typically assessed by permutation testing; however, different permutation strategies imply distinct null hypothesis and exchangeability assumptions. In this study, we systematically compare three widely used approaches embedded in popular chemometric software packages where the permutation strategy is often predefined and not always transparent to the user. The restricted permutation method shuffles observations only within experimental strata, preserving the structure of the null hypothesis. The reduced‐model permutation contrasts the full ASCA model with a simplified version in which selected effects are removed. Permutation of marginal design matrices isolates interaction effects by permuting marginal matrices derived from the design matrix. We evaluate these methods on simulated datasets with varying patterns of main effects and interactions, as well as on an experimental study of feral cabbage (Brassica oleracea) under treatment and time factors. Our results show that the restricted permutation method reliably detects main effects, reduced‐model permutation excels at identifying interactions, and permutation of marginal design matrices consistently captures both. By examining the assumptions and performance of each method, we provide practical guidance for selecting the optimal permutation strategy in ASCA-based chemometric analysis, particularly for balanced experimental designs. As a baseline, we additionally assessed unrestricted permutation of the raw data using two test statistics: the sum of squares and the F-ratio. The results demonstrated that when employing the F-ratio, this approach was also capable of accurately detecting statistical significance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9774,"journal":{"name":"Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems","volume":"268 ","pages":"Article 105573"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169743925002588","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ANOVA Simultaneous Component Analysis (ASCA) integrates analysis of variance with multivariate modelling to quantify how experimental factors and their interactions affect complex multivariate measurements. Statistical significance in ASCA is typically assessed by permutation testing; however, different permutation strategies imply distinct null hypothesis and exchangeability assumptions. In this study, we systematically compare three widely used approaches embedded in popular chemometric software packages where the permutation strategy is often predefined and not always transparent to the user. The restricted permutation method shuffles observations only within experimental strata, preserving the structure of the null hypothesis. The reduced‐model permutation contrasts the full ASCA model with a simplified version in which selected effects are removed. Permutation of marginal design matrices isolates interaction effects by permuting marginal matrices derived from the design matrix. We evaluate these methods on simulated datasets with varying patterns of main effects and interactions, as well as on an experimental study of feral cabbage (Brassica oleracea) under treatment and time factors. Our results show that the restricted permutation method reliably detects main effects, reduced‐model permutation excels at identifying interactions, and permutation of marginal design matrices consistently captures both. By examining the assumptions and performance of each method, we provide practical guidance for selecting the optimal permutation strategy in ASCA-based chemometric analysis, particularly for balanced experimental designs. As a baseline, we additionally assessed unrestricted permutation of the raw data using two test statistics: the sum of squares and the F-ratio. The results demonstrated that when employing the F-ratio, this approach was also capable of accurately detecting statistical significance.
期刊介绍:
Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems publishes original research papers, short communications, reviews, tutorials and Original Software Publications reporting on development of novel statistical, mathematical, or computer techniques in Chemistry and related disciplines.
Chemometrics is the chemical discipline that uses mathematical and statistical methods to design or select optimal procedures and experiments, and to provide maximum chemical information by analysing chemical data.
The journal deals with the following topics:
1) Development of new statistical, mathematical and chemometrical methods for Chemistry and related fields (Environmental Chemistry, Biochemistry, Toxicology, System Biology, -Omics, etc.)
2) Novel applications of chemometrics to all branches of Chemistry and related fields (typical domains of interest are: process data analysis, experimental design, data mining, signal processing, supervised modelling, decision making, robust statistics, mixture analysis, multivariate calibration etc.) Routine applications of established chemometrical techniques will not be considered.
3) Development of new software that provides novel tools or truly advances the use of chemometrical methods.
4) Well characterized data sets to test performance for the new methods and software.
The journal complies with International Committee of Medical Journal Editors'' Uniform requirements for manuscripts.