AI-enabled POCUS for breast cancer risk stratification in a resource-limited tertiary clinic.

IF 1 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
SA Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2025-10-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajr.v29i1.3195
Kathryn Malherbe, Francois Malherbe, Liana Roodt
{"title":"AI-enabled POCUS for breast cancer risk stratification in a resource-limited tertiary clinic.","authors":"Kathryn Malherbe, Francois Malherbe, Liana Roodt","doi":"10.4102/sajr.v29i1.3195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer remains a major public health burden in South Africa, with diagnostic delays contributing to poor outcomes. Ultrasound is effective for early detection but is limited by access and operator variability. Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) offers a potential solution.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a locally developed AI-enabled POCUS system (Breast AI) in predicting malignancy among women with palpable breast abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A prospective cohort study was conducted between June 2024 and November 2024 at Groote Schuur Hospital. Women aged ≥ 25 years with suspicious breast lesions underwent Breast AI ultrasound prior to biopsy. Real-time malignancy risk scores were compared with histopathological results. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), F1 score and area under the curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 159 participants, Breast AI achieved a sensitivity of 67.2%, specificity of 79.4% and PPV of 70.3% at a 51% threshold. The AUC was 0.76, reflecting moderate discriminatory performance. F1 score analysis identified 51% as the optimal cut-off (F1 = 65.7%). Benign pathologies such as fibroadenomas and fat necrosis correlated with low AI scores. A three-tiered risk model was developed: < 30% (low), 30% - 51% (intermediate) and > 51% (high risk).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Breast AI demonstrates promising diagnostic accuracy for triaging suspicious breast lesions, particularly in resource-constrained settings.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>This study provides real-world evidence supporting the integration of AI into POCUS to improve breast cancer detection and clinical decision-making in low-resource environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":43442,"journal":{"name":"SA Journal of Radiology","volume":"29 1","pages":"3195"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12587214/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v29i1.3195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer remains a major public health burden in South Africa, with diagnostic delays contributing to poor outcomes. Ultrasound is effective for early detection but is limited by access and operator variability. Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) offers a potential solution.

Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a locally developed AI-enabled POCUS system (Breast AI) in predicting malignancy among women with palpable breast abnormalities.

Method: A prospective cohort study was conducted between June 2024 and November 2024 at Groote Schuur Hospital. Women aged ≥ 25 years with suspicious breast lesions underwent Breast AI ultrasound prior to biopsy. Real-time malignancy risk scores were compared with histopathological results. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), F1 score and area under the curve (AUC).

Results: Among 159 participants, Breast AI achieved a sensitivity of 67.2%, specificity of 79.4% and PPV of 70.3% at a 51% threshold. The AUC was 0.76, reflecting moderate discriminatory performance. F1 score analysis identified 51% as the optimal cut-off (F1 = 65.7%). Benign pathologies such as fibroadenomas and fat necrosis correlated with low AI scores. A three-tiered risk model was developed: < 30% (low), 30% - 51% (intermediate) and > 51% (high risk).

Conclusion: Breast AI demonstrates promising diagnostic accuracy for triaging suspicious breast lesions, particularly in resource-constrained settings.

Contribution: This study provides real-world evidence supporting the integration of AI into POCUS to improve breast cancer detection and clinical decision-making in low-resource environments.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

人工智能POCUS在资源有限的三级诊所进行乳腺癌风险分层。
背景:在南非,乳腺癌仍然是一个主要的公共卫生负担,诊断延误导致预后不良。超声对早期发现是有效的,但受限于访问和操作人员的可变性。将人工智能(AI)集成到即时超声(POCUS)中提供了一个潜在的解决方案。目的:评估本地开发的人工智能POCUS系统(乳腺人工智能)在预测可触及乳房异常女性恶性肿瘤中的诊断性能。方法:于2024年6月至2024年11月在Groote Schuur医院进行前瞻性队列研究。年龄≥25岁有可疑乳腺病变的女性在活检前行乳腺人工智能超声检查。将实时恶性肿瘤风险评分与组织病理学结果进行比较。采用敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、F1评分和曲线下面积(AUC)评估诊断准确性。结果:在159名参与者中,乳腺AI的敏感性为67.2%,特异性为79.4%,PPV为70.3%,阈值为51%。AUC为0.76,反映了中等程度的歧视表现。F1评分分析确定51%为最佳临界值(F1 = 65.7%)。良性病理如纤维腺瘤和脂肪坏死与低AI评分相关。建立了三层风险模型:< 30%(低),30% - 51%(中等)和> 51%(高风险)。结论:乳腺人工智能在鉴别可疑乳腺病变方面具有良好的诊断准确性,特别是在资源有限的情况下。贡献:本研究提供了现实世界的证据,支持将人工智能整合到POCUS中,以改善低资源环境下的乳腺癌检测和临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SA Journal of Radiology
SA Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The SA Journal of Radiology is the official journal of the Radiological Society of South Africa and the Professional Association of Radiologists in South Africa and Namibia. The SA Journal of Radiology is a general diagnostic radiological journal which carries original research and review articles, pictorial essays, case reports, letters, editorials, radiological practice and other radiological articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书