Kathleen M. Schieffer , Renu Bajaj , Selene C. Koo , Josee Lavoie , Dolores Lopez-Terrada , Xinyan Lu , Minjie Luo , Thuy Phung , Teresa A. Smolarek , Maxine Sutcliffe , Jennelle C. Hodge , Cancer Genomics Consortium Sarcoma Working Group
{"title":"Current state of diagnostic genetic testing in pediatric sarcoma: Survey and review by the Cancer Genomics Consortium Sarcoma Working Group","authors":"Kathleen M. Schieffer , Renu Bajaj , Selene C. Koo , Josee Lavoie , Dolores Lopez-Terrada , Xinyan Lu , Minjie Luo , Thuy Phung , Teresa A. Smolarek , Maxine Sutcliffe , Jennelle C. Hodge , Cancer Genomics Consortium Sarcoma Working Group","doi":"10.1016/j.cancergen.2025.10.106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The genomic landscape of pediatric sarcomas is constantly expanding, and the utilization of integrated cytogenetic and molecular evaluation of these tumors for diagnosis, prognostication, and therapeutic implications continues to evolve. As a result, there are diverse approaches to the clinical practice of genomic testing in pediatric sarcomas. The Cancer Genomics Consortium Sarcoma Working Group conducted a survey to understand the current state of diagnostic genetic testing for pediatric sarcomas and assess the challenges faced in the field. Among 46 respondents across the United States and Canada, most utilized conventional karyotyping (61 %) and/or fluorescence <em>in situ</em> hybridization (87 %). Molecular methodologies, such as chromosomal microarray (30 %), targeted RT-PCR (22 %), gene fusion sequencing panels (35 %), pan-cancer sequencing panels (37 %), exome sequencing (11 %), and genome sequencing (7 %) were less frequently implemented clinically. When asked about challenges in the field of pediatric sarcoma, a scarcity of standard practice testing guidelines was noted most commonly, especially in the setting of limited tissue availability. Systematic evidence reviews and guidelines are needed for pediatric sarcomas with a consideration for multidisciplinary and international collaboration of individuals representing both high- and low-resource settings. As a resource in the interim, three case-based testing workflow scenarios are presented based on working group member experience to illustrate how differing technologies could be applied during evaluation considering diagnostic, prognostic and/or therapeutic needs. Finally, emerging technologies that are being applied to the diagnostic genetic evaluation of pediatric sarcomas are described, which upon implementation, may serve to streamline the work-up and further optimize patient care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49225,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Genetics","volume":"298 ","pages":"Pages 242-255"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210776225002297","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The genomic landscape of pediatric sarcomas is constantly expanding, and the utilization of integrated cytogenetic and molecular evaluation of these tumors for diagnosis, prognostication, and therapeutic implications continues to evolve. As a result, there are diverse approaches to the clinical practice of genomic testing in pediatric sarcomas. The Cancer Genomics Consortium Sarcoma Working Group conducted a survey to understand the current state of diagnostic genetic testing for pediatric sarcomas and assess the challenges faced in the field. Among 46 respondents across the United States and Canada, most utilized conventional karyotyping (61 %) and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (87 %). Molecular methodologies, such as chromosomal microarray (30 %), targeted RT-PCR (22 %), gene fusion sequencing panels (35 %), pan-cancer sequencing panels (37 %), exome sequencing (11 %), and genome sequencing (7 %) were less frequently implemented clinically. When asked about challenges in the field of pediatric sarcoma, a scarcity of standard practice testing guidelines was noted most commonly, especially in the setting of limited tissue availability. Systematic evidence reviews and guidelines are needed for pediatric sarcomas with a consideration for multidisciplinary and international collaboration of individuals representing both high- and low-resource settings. As a resource in the interim, three case-based testing workflow scenarios are presented based on working group member experience to illustrate how differing technologies could be applied during evaluation considering diagnostic, prognostic and/or therapeutic needs. Finally, emerging technologies that are being applied to the diagnostic genetic evaluation of pediatric sarcomas are described, which upon implementation, may serve to streamline the work-up and further optimize patient care.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Cancer Genetics is to publish high quality scientific papers on the cellular, genetic and molecular aspects of cancer, including cancer predisposition and clinical diagnostic applications. Specific areas of interest include descriptions of new chromosomal, molecular or epigenetic alterations in benign and malignant diseases; novel laboratory approaches for identification and characterization of chromosomal rearrangements or genomic alterations in cancer cells; correlation of genetic changes with pathology and clinical presentation; and the molecular genetics of cancer predisposition. To reach a basic science and clinical multidisciplinary audience, we welcome original full-length articles, reviews, meeting summaries, brief reports, and letters to the editor.