Prevalence and predictors of atrial fibrillation detected after stroke or transient ischemic attack: A comprehensive meta-analysis.

IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
International Journal of Stroke Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-07 DOI:10.1177/17474930251398615
Ghassab E Ababneh, Ahmed Yassin, Malik Allahham, Khaled Alawneh, Suhyb Hamed, Sohaib A Alomari, Mohammad B Jaradat, Abdallah Alkhawaldeh, Abdallah Almbaidin
{"title":"Prevalence and predictors of atrial fibrillation detected after stroke or transient ischemic attack: A comprehensive meta-analysis.","authors":"Ghassab E Ababneh, Ahmed Yassin, Malik Allahham, Khaled Alawneh, Suhyb Hamed, Sohaib A Alomari, Mohammad B Jaradat, Abdallah Alkhawaldeh, Abdallah Almbaidin","doi":"10.1177/17474930251398615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atrial fibrillation (AF) detected after stroke or transient ischemic attack (AFDAS) is a critical but often underdiagnosed condition with implications for secondary stroke prevention. This distinctive type of AF is increasingly studied to provide a more comprehensive understanding of its complex pathophysiology, which may involve both cardiogenic mechanisms and stroke-induced autonomic dysfunction, a concept known as the neurogenic hypothesis. This study aims to identify the prevalence and predictors of AFDAS to help refine monitoring strategies and improve patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We included English-language retrospective and prospective cohort studies published from January 1999 to January 2025, analyzing data from 91 studies for prevalence and 54 studies for predictors. We categorized AF detection by different monitoring methods, including electrocardiogram (ECG), Holter monitoring, external loop recorders, and implantable cardiac monitors (ICM). Predictors were grouped into demographic, cardiogenic, neurogenic, and laboratory factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall prevalence of AFDAS varied significantly based on monitoring technique. The pooled prevalence was 7% (95% CI 4.6-10.5) by emergency room ECG, 12.7% (95% CI 9-17.8) by inpatient ECG, 11.9% (95% CI 7.8-17.9) by continuous ECG monitoring, 11.5% (95% CI 8-16.1) by external loop recording, 5.1% (95% CI 2.6-9.7) by Holter monitor, 21.3% (95% CI 18.3-24.7) by ICM, and 17.2% (95% CI 10-28.1) by multiple monitoring methods. Key predictors of AFDAS included older age, female sex, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, left atrial enlargement, advanced interatrial block, and higher NIHSS scores. Insular involvement and major strokes were strongly associated with AF detection, supporting the neurogenic hypothesis. Elevated N-terminal pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) and B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) levels were also linked to a higher AF risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AFDAS is a frequent but variably detected condition, with its prevalence strongly dependent on monitoring duration and modality. Identifying high-risk patients using a combination of clinical, cardiogenic, neurogenic, and laboratory markers can optimize screening strategies and early anticoagulation initiation, potentially reducing stroke recurrence. Future research should focus on refining risk scores integrating neurogenic and cardiogenic markers to guide personalized monitoring approaches and to define the distinct characteristics of AFDAS from known atrial fibrillation (KAF).</p>","PeriodicalId":14442,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"910-922"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930251398615","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) detected after stroke or transient ischemic attack (AFDAS) is a critical but often underdiagnosed condition with implications for secondary stroke prevention. This distinctive type of AF is increasingly studied to provide a more comprehensive understanding of its complex pathophysiology, which may involve both cardiogenic mechanisms and stroke-induced autonomic dysfunction, a concept known as the neurogenic hypothesis. This study aims to identify the prevalence and predictors of AFDAS to help refine monitoring strategies and improve patient outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We included English-language retrospective and prospective cohort studies published from January 1999 to January 2025, analyzing data from 91 studies for prevalence and 54 studies for predictors. We categorized AF detection by different monitoring methods, including electrocardiogram (ECG), Holter monitoring, external loop recorders, and implantable cardiac monitors (ICM). Predictors were grouped into demographic, cardiogenic, neurogenic, and laboratory factors.

Results: The overall prevalence of AFDAS varied significantly based on monitoring technique. The pooled prevalence was 7% (95% CI 4.6-10.5) by emergency room ECG, 12.7% (95% CI 9-17.8) by inpatient ECG, 11.9% (95% CI 7.8-17.9) by continuous ECG monitoring, 11.5% (95% CI 8-16.1) by external loop recording, 5.1% (95% CI 2.6-9.7) by Holter monitor, 21.3% (95% CI 18.3-24.7) by ICM, and 17.2% (95% CI 10-28.1) by multiple monitoring methods. Key predictors of AFDAS included older age, female sex, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, left atrial enlargement, advanced interatrial block, and higher NIHSS scores. Insular involvement and major strokes were strongly associated with AF detection, supporting the neurogenic hypothesis. Elevated N-terminal pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) and B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) levels were also linked to a higher AF risk.

Conclusion: AFDAS is a frequent but variably detected condition, with its prevalence strongly dependent on monitoring duration and modality. Identifying high-risk patients using a combination of clinical, cardiogenic, neurogenic, and laboratory markers can optimize screening strategies and early anticoagulation initiation, potentially reducing stroke recurrence. Future research should focus on refining risk scores integrating neurogenic and cardiogenic markers to guide personalized monitoring approaches and to define the distinct characteristics of AFDAS from known atrial fibrillation (KAF).

卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作后房颤的患病率和预测因素:一项综合meta分析。
背景:在卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作(AFDAS)后检测到心房颤动(AF)是一种严重但经常未被诊断的疾病,具有继发性卒中预防的意义。这种独特类型的房颤的研究越来越多,为其复杂的病理生理学提供了更全面的理解,这可能涉及心源性机制和中风诱导的自主神经功能障碍,这一概念被称为神经源性假说。本研究旨在确定AFDAS的患病率和预测因素,以帮助完善监测策略和改善患者预后。方法:我们按照PRISMA指南进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。我们纳入了1999年1月至2025年1月发表的英语回顾性和前瞻性队列研究。分析了91项患病率研究和54项预测因素研究的数据。我们通过不同的监测方法对房颤检测进行分类,包括心电图、动态心电图监测、外部环路记录仪和植入式心脏监护仪。预测因子分为人口学因素、心源性因素、神经源性因素和实验室因素。结果:卒中后心房颤动(AFDAS)的总体患病率因监测技术的不同而有显著差异。急诊心电图总患病率为7% (95% CI 4.6-10.5),住院心电图总患病率为12.7% (95% CI 9-17.8),连续心电图总患病率为11.9% (95% CI 7.8-17.9),外环记录总患病率为11.5% (95% CI 8-16.1),霍尔特监护总患病率为5.1% (95% CI 2.6-9.7),植入式心脏监护总患病率为21.3% (95% CI 18.3-24.7),多种监护总患病率为17.2% (95% CI 10-28.1)。AFDAS的主要预测因素包括年龄较大、女性、高血压、慢性肾脏疾病、左房扩大、晚期房间传导阻滞和较高的NIHSS评分。岛岛受累和主要中风与房颤检测密切相关,支持神经源性假说。NT-proBNP、HbA1c和肌酐水平升高也与房颤风险升高有关。结论:AFDAS是一种常见但易被发现的疾病,其患病率与监测时间和方式密切相关。结合临床、神经源性和实验室标志物识别高危患者可以优化筛查策略和早期抗凝治疗,潜在地减少卒中复发。未来的研究应侧重于完善整合神经源性和心源性标志物的风险评分,以指导个性化监测方法,并定义AFDAS与已知心房颤动(KAF)的不同特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Stroke
International Journal of Stroke 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
6.00%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Stroke is a welcome addition to the international stroke journal landscape in that it concentrates on the clinical aspects of stroke with basic science contributions in areas of clinical interest. Reviews of current topics are broadly based to encompass not only recent advances of global interest but also those which may be more important in certain regions and the journal regularly features items of news interest from all parts of the world. To facilitate the international nature of the journal, our Associate Editors from Europe, Asia, North America and South America coordinate segments of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书