The Supreme court judgment on caste-based prescriptions in prison manuals - tip of the iceberg.

Sylvia Karpagam
{"title":"The Supreme court judgment on caste-based prescriptions in prison manuals - tip of the iceberg.","authors":"Sylvia Karpagam","doi":"10.20529/IJME.2025.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Supreme Court of India had, in a public interest litigation based on an article by journalist Sukanya Shantha in The Wire, sharply criticised existing prison manuals for several clauses reinforcing the age-old injustices of caste-based discrimination and segregation. The Court found ample evidence of this discrimination, both in prison manuals and in the administration of Indian prisons, and instructed the authorities to ensure corrections within three months. While the Court's verdict is commendable and much needed, these violations only reflect the discrimination prevalent in the larger society, in spite of the Constitutional guarantee of equality before the law. This commentary argues that such discriminatory practices should not only be banned in prisons but actively prohibited and jointly addressed in society at large by the Courts, the Legislature, the Executive, as well as the media.</p>","PeriodicalId":517372,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of medical ethics","volume":"X 4","pages":"293-296"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of medical ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2025.052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Supreme Court of India had, in a public interest litigation based on an article by journalist Sukanya Shantha in The Wire, sharply criticised existing prison manuals for several clauses reinforcing the age-old injustices of caste-based discrimination and segregation. The Court found ample evidence of this discrimination, both in prison manuals and in the administration of Indian prisons, and instructed the authorities to ensure corrections within three months. While the Court's verdict is commendable and much needed, these violations only reflect the discrimination prevalent in the larger society, in spite of the Constitutional guarantee of equality before the law. This commentary argues that such discriminatory practices should not only be banned in prisons but actively prohibited and jointly addressed in society at large by the Courts, the Legislature, the Executive, as well as the media.

最高法院对监狱手册中基于种姓的处方的判决——只是冰山一角。
印度最高法院在一场基于记者Sukanya Shantha在The Wire上的一篇文章的公益诉讼中,尖锐地批评了现有监狱手册中的几个条款,这些条款强化了基于种姓的歧视和隔离的长期不公正。法院在监狱手册和印度监狱的管理中都发现了这种歧视的充分证据,并指示当局确保在三个月内进行矫正。虽然法院的判决是值得赞扬和非常需要的,但这些违法行为只反映了大社会中普遍存在的歧视,尽管宪法保障法律面前人人平等。本评论认为,这种歧视性做法不仅应在监狱中禁止,而且应由法院、立法机关、行政机关和媒体在整个社会中积极禁止和共同解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书