Integrating clinical guidelines with large language models for improved sepsis mortality prediction.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Informatics Journal Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-06 DOI:10.1177/14604582251387649
Zhen Zhao, Bo An, Tianpeng Zhang, Ruiyi Zhu, Zihao Fan, Guoxing Wang
{"title":"Integrating clinical guidelines with large language models for improved sepsis mortality prediction.","authors":"Zhen Zhao, Bo An, Tianpeng Zhang, Ruiyi Zhu, Zihao Fan, Guoxing Wang","doi":"10.1177/14604582251387649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We develop and validate a clinical guideline-integrated LLM for enhanced sepsis mortality prediction. Using MIMIC-IV data from 24,237 ICU sepsis patients, we fine-tuned a large language model with Low-Rank Adaptation, embedding clinical guidelines into the training process. The model's predictive performance was evaluated using accuracy, F1-score, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Ablation studies assessed the specific contributions of clinical guideline integration. The guideline-enhanced fine-tuned LLM demonstrated moderately higher performance across all evaluation metrics including predictive accuracy (0.819), F1-score (0.815), sensitivity (0.815), specificity (0.822), and AUC (0.852) in predicting mortality risk for septic patients compared to traditional machine learning (highest accuracy: 0.774, AUC: 0.850) and deep learning methods (highest accuracy: 0.762, AUC: 0.841). Ablation experiments demonstrated that explicit integration of clinical guideline knowledge substantially improved performance over both direct prompting (accuracy: 0.709, AUC: 0.706) and fine-tuning without clinical guidelines (accuracy: 0.786, AUC: 0.801). These findings demonstrate that incorporating clinical guidelines into the fine-tuning of large language models outperforms both traditional and deep learning baselines across multiple metrics in sepsis mortality prediction, highlighting the value of explicit domain knowledge integration for clinical AI's robustness.</p>","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":"31 4","pages":"14604582251387649"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582251387649","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We develop and validate a clinical guideline-integrated LLM for enhanced sepsis mortality prediction. Using MIMIC-IV data from 24,237 ICU sepsis patients, we fine-tuned a large language model with Low-Rank Adaptation, embedding clinical guidelines into the training process. The model's predictive performance was evaluated using accuracy, F1-score, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Ablation studies assessed the specific contributions of clinical guideline integration. The guideline-enhanced fine-tuned LLM demonstrated moderately higher performance across all evaluation metrics including predictive accuracy (0.819), F1-score (0.815), sensitivity (0.815), specificity (0.822), and AUC (0.852) in predicting mortality risk for septic patients compared to traditional machine learning (highest accuracy: 0.774, AUC: 0.850) and deep learning methods (highest accuracy: 0.762, AUC: 0.841). Ablation experiments demonstrated that explicit integration of clinical guideline knowledge substantially improved performance over both direct prompting (accuracy: 0.709, AUC: 0.706) and fine-tuning without clinical guidelines (accuracy: 0.786, AUC: 0.801). These findings demonstrate that incorporating clinical guidelines into the fine-tuning of large language models outperforms both traditional and deep learning baselines across multiple metrics in sepsis mortality prediction, highlighting the value of explicit domain knowledge integration for clinical AI's robustness.

整合临床指南与大型语言模型,以改善败血症死亡率预测。
我们开发并验证了一种临床指南整合的LLM,用于增强败血症死亡率预测。使用来自24,237名ICU脓毒症患者的MIMIC-IV数据,我们微调了一个具有低秩适应的大型语言模型,将临床指南嵌入到训练过程中。模型的预测性能通过准确性、f1评分、敏感性、特异性和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)进行评估。消融研究评估了临床指南整合的具体贡献。与传统机器学习方法(最高准确率:0.774,AUC: 0.850)和深度学习方法(最高准确率:0.762,AUC: 0.841)相比,指南增强的微调LLM在预测败血症患者死亡风险的所有评估指标上表现出较高的性能,包括预测准确率(0.819)、一级评分(0.815)、敏感性(0.815)、特异性(0.822)和AUC(0.852)。消融实验表明,明确整合临床指南知识大大提高了直接提示(准确性:0.709,AUC: 0.706)和没有临床指南的微调(准确性:0.786,AUC: 0.801)的性能。这些研究结果表明,将临床指南纳入大型语言模型的微调中,在脓毒症死亡率预测的多个指标上优于传统和深度学习基线,突出了显式领域知识整合对临床人工智能稳健性的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Informatics Journal
Health Informatics Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICAL INFORMATICS
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书