NEW CLINICAL MEASURES OF HAND AND WRIST PROPRIOCEPTION: A PILOT STUDY FOR EVALUATING DISCRIMINATIVE VALIDITY AND TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY IN INDIVIDUALS WITH WRIST DISABILITY.
Maria Sontag, Ulrik Röijezon, Christina Brogårdh, Elisabeth Ekstrand
{"title":"NEW CLINICAL MEASURES OF HAND AND WRIST PROPRIOCEPTION: A PILOT STUDY FOR EVALUATING DISCRIMINATIVE VALIDITY AND TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY IN INDIVIDUALS WITH WRIST DISABILITY.","authors":"Maria Sontag, Ulrik Röijezon, Christina Brogårdh, Elisabeth Ekstrand","doi":"10.2340/jrm-cc.v8.43929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate psychometric properties of newly developed hand and wrist proprioception tests.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional and test-retest comparisons.</p><p><strong>Subjects/patients: </strong>Twenty-six individuals (mean age 40 years) with wrist disability (> 3 months) due to traumatic injury or general instability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pointing acuity (with eyes open and closed), active joint position sense (in extension, flexion, radial- and ulnar deviation) and grip force reproduction were measured by 1 rater on 2 occasions, 1 week apart. The mean absolute error was calculated for each test. Discriminative validity (affected vs non-affected hand/wrist) was evaluated by paired <i>t</i>-test and test-retest reliability with Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pointing acuity test with eyes closed gave higher errors for the affected hand/wrist (<i>p</i> = 0.08) and good ICCs (0.80-0.85), while the test with eyes open had poor discriminative ability (<i>p</i> = 0.32) and test-retest reliability (ICC 0.13-0.16). The active joint position sense test showed higher error in flexion for the affected wrist (<i>p</i> = 0.03), and the ICC was moderate (0.51). The remaining joint directions and the grip force reproduction test had poor discriminative ability (<i>p</i> = 0.21-0.94) and poor to moderate ICCs (0.00-0.65).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pointing acuity test with eyes closed and the active joint position test in flexion show-ed promising results but need further evaluation in larger samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":73929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications","volume":"8 ","pages":"43929"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12584012/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm-cc.v8.43929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate psychometric properties of newly developed hand and wrist proprioception tests.
Design: Cross-sectional and test-retest comparisons.
Subjects/patients: Twenty-six individuals (mean age 40 years) with wrist disability (> 3 months) due to traumatic injury or general instability.
Methods: Pointing acuity (with eyes open and closed), active joint position sense (in extension, flexion, radial- and ulnar deviation) and grip force reproduction were measured by 1 rater on 2 occasions, 1 week apart. The mean absolute error was calculated for each test. Discriminative validity (affected vs non-affected hand/wrist) was evaluated by paired t-test and test-retest reliability with Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).
Results: The pointing acuity test with eyes closed gave higher errors for the affected hand/wrist (p = 0.08) and good ICCs (0.80-0.85), while the test with eyes open had poor discriminative ability (p = 0.32) and test-retest reliability (ICC 0.13-0.16). The active joint position sense test showed higher error in flexion for the affected wrist (p = 0.03), and the ICC was moderate (0.51). The remaining joint directions and the grip force reproduction test had poor discriminative ability (p = 0.21-0.94) and poor to moderate ICCs (0.00-0.65).
Conclusion: The pointing acuity test with eyes closed and the active joint position test in flexion show-ed promising results but need further evaluation in larger samples.