Lactulose for prevention of cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction: A retrospective cohort study.

IF 0.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease Pub Date : 2025-11-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20480040251393767
Lin Chen, Fei Wang, Hui Zhang, Sheng Qin, Ming Sui, Tomoaki Ishigami
{"title":"Lactulose for prevention of cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Lin Chen, Fei Wang, Hui Zhang, Sheng Qin, Ming Sui, Tomoaki Ishigami","doi":"10.1177/20480040251393767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains a major cause of global mortality, with post-infarction cardiovascular events significantly contributing to poor outcomes. Emerging evidence suggests that gut microbiome dysbiosis may influence cardiovascular risk through increased intestinal permeability and systemic inflammation. Although lactulose-a prebiotic known to modulate gut microbiota-has shown beneficial effects in experimental models, its impact on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) after AMI remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 165 AMI patients hospitalized between 2016 and 2019. Participants were stratified by lactulose use during hospitalization. The primary outcome was in-hospital MACEs. Multivariable logistic regression was used. Secondary outcomes included pneumonia incidence and length of hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After adjustment for confounders, lactulose use was independently associated with a reduced risk of MACEs (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16-0.95; p = 0.038). The overall incidence of MACEs was 18.2% in the lactulose group versus 30.0% in controls, though this difference was not statistically significant in unadjusted analysis (χ² = 2.41, p = 0.12), likely reflecting limited statistical power. No significant associations were observed for pneumonia (OR = 0.17, p = 0.09) or hospital stay duration (p = 0.60).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this retrospective analysis, lactulose supplementation was associated with reduced in-hospital cardiovascular events following AMI. However, these preliminary findings require validation in larger prospective studies to establish causality and elucidate underlying gut-mediated mechanisms. If confirmed, lactulose may represent a simple and accessible adjunct therapy in post-infarction care.</p>","PeriodicalId":30457,"journal":{"name":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","volume":"14 ","pages":"20480040251393767"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12583842/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20480040251393767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains a major cause of global mortality, with post-infarction cardiovascular events significantly contributing to poor outcomes. Emerging evidence suggests that gut microbiome dysbiosis may influence cardiovascular risk through increased intestinal permeability and systemic inflammation. Although lactulose-a prebiotic known to modulate gut microbiota-has shown beneficial effects in experimental models, its impact on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) after AMI remains unclear.

Methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 165 AMI patients hospitalized between 2016 and 2019. Participants were stratified by lactulose use during hospitalization. The primary outcome was in-hospital MACEs. Multivariable logistic regression was used. Secondary outcomes included pneumonia incidence and length of hospital stay.

Results: After adjustment for confounders, lactulose use was independently associated with a reduced risk of MACEs (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16-0.95; p = 0.038). The overall incidence of MACEs was 18.2% in the lactulose group versus 30.0% in controls, though this difference was not statistically significant in unadjusted analysis (χ² = 2.41, p = 0.12), likely reflecting limited statistical power. No significant associations were observed for pneumonia (OR = 0.17, p = 0.09) or hospital stay duration (p = 0.60).

Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, lactulose supplementation was associated with reduced in-hospital cardiovascular events following AMI. However, these preliminary findings require validation in larger prospective studies to establish causality and elucidate underlying gut-mediated mechanisms. If confirmed, lactulose may represent a simple and accessible adjunct therapy in post-infarction care.

乳果糖预防心肌梗死后心血管事件:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:急性心肌梗死(AMI)仍然是全球死亡的主要原因,梗死后心血管事件显著导致预后不良。新出现的证据表明,肠道微生物群失调可能通过增加肠道通透性和全身性炎症来影响心血管风险。尽管乳果糖——一种已知可以调节肠道微生物群的益生元——在实验模型中显示出有益的作用,但其对AMI后主要不良心血管事件(mace)的影响尚不清楚。方法:在这项单中心回顾性队列研究中,我们分析了2016年至2019年住院的165例AMI患者。根据住院期间乳果糖的使用情况对参与者进行分层。主要观察指标为院内mace。采用多变量logistic回归。次要结局包括肺炎发生率和住院时间。结果:调整混杂因素后,乳果糖的使用与mace风险降低独立相关(调整优势比(OR) 0.40, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.16-0.95;p = 0.038)。乳果糖组的mace总发生率为18.2%,对照组为30.0%,但在未经调整的分析中,这一差异无统计学意义(χ²= 2.41,p = 0.12),可能反映了有限的统计效力。与肺炎(OR = 0.17, p = 0.09)或住院时间(p = 0.60)无显著相关性。结论:在这项回顾性分析中,补充乳果糖与AMI后住院心血管事件的减少有关。然而,这些初步发现需要在更大规模的前瞻性研究中进行验证,以建立因果关系并阐明潜在的肠道介导机制。如果得到证实,乳果糖可能是梗死后护理中一种简单易行的辅助疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
6.20%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书