Spinal Anesthesia and Postoperative Complications Following Pediatric Hypospadias Repair: A Retrospective Review.

IF 1.8 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Local and Regional Anesthesia Pub Date : 2025-10-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/LRA.S552555
Grant Heydinger, Josiane Kerbage, Catherine Roth, Sibelle Aurelie Yeleme Kitio, Giorgio Veneziano, Joseph D Tobias, V Rama Jayanthi
{"title":"Spinal Anesthesia and Postoperative Complications Following Pediatric Hypospadias Repair: A Retrospective Review.","authors":"Grant Heydinger, Josiane Kerbage, Catherine Roth, Sibelle Aurelie Yeleme Kitio, Giorgio Veneziano, Joseph D Tobias, V Rama Jayanthi","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S552555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recently, concerns have been raised regarding the impact of anesthetic choice on outcomes for patients undergoing hypospadias repair. It has been suggested that caudal epidural anesthesia (CEA) may be associated with increased postoperative complications, such as urethrocutaneous fistula and glanular dehiscence. However, subsequent studies have found no association between CEA and increased complications. Spinal anesthesia (SA) is another technique that can provide surgical blockade during hypospadias repair. However, no studies have examined outcomes for pediatric patients undergoing hypospadias repair under awake SA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a single-center retrospective review on all patients who underwent single-stage primary hypospadias repair from 2016 until 2023. Data collected included patient demographics, anesthetic details, severity of hypospadias, duration of procedure, and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>805 patients underwent single-stage hypospadias repair during the study period. 117 (14.5%) had GA alone, 563 (70%) had GA with CEA, and 125 (15.5%) had SA. Duration of surgery was significantly longer for patients in the GA and CEA groups compared to the SA group, and more patients in the GA and CEA groups had a higher severity of hypospadias. We did not find significant differences in the odds ratio for postoperative complications between groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In our retrospective analysis, we did not find a difference between anesthetic groups in the rate of postoperative complications. Patients who had SA were younger and had a shorter median surgical time. Because SA has a limited duration, patients with more complicated pathologies may not be offered SA as an option. SA is an underutilized technique for pediatric urologic procedures, but has several benefits over GA for infants and young children.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SA can be successfully utilized for hypospadias surgery in pediatric patients without an increase in postoperative complications. Future studies on this topic are warranted due to significant baseline differences between patient groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"18 ","pages":"121-129"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12584795/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S552555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Recently, concerns have been raised regarding the impact of anesthetic choice on outcomes for patients undergoing hypospadias repair. It has been suggested that caudal epidural anesthesia (CEA) may be associated with increased postoperative complications, such as urethrocutaneous fistula and glanular dehiscence. However, subsequent studies have found no association between CEA and increased complications. Spinal anesthesia (SA) is another technique that can provide surgical blockade during hypospadias repair. However, no studies have examined outcomes for pediatric patients undergoing hypospadias repair under awake SA.

Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective review on all patients who underwent single-stage primary hypospadias repair from 2016 until 2023. Data collected included patient demographics, anesthetic details, severity of hypospadias, duration of procedure, and postoperative complications.

Results: 805 patients underwent single-stage hypospadias repair during the study period. 117 (14.5%) had GA alone, 563 (70%) had GA with CEA, and 125 (15.5%) had SA. Duration of surgery was significantly longer for patients in the GA and CEA groups compared to the SA group, and more patients in the GA and CEA groups had a higher severity of hypospadias. We did not find significant differences in the odds ratio for postoperative complications between groups.

Discussion: In our retrospective analysis, we did not find a difference between anesthetic groups in the rate of postoperative complications. Patients who had SA were younger and had a shorter median surgical time. Because SA has a limited duration, patients with more complicated pathologies may not be offered SA as an option. SA is an underutilized technique for pediatric urologic procedures, but has several benefits over GA for infants and young children.

Conclusion: SA can be successfully utilized for hypospadias surgery in pediatric patients without an increase in postoperative complications. Future studies on this topic are warranted due to significant baseline differences between patient groups.

脊髓麻醉和小儿尿道下裂修复术后并发症:回顾性回顾。
导读:最近,关于麻醉选择对尿道下裂修补术患者预后的影响,人们提出了关注。有研究表明,尾侧硬膜外麻醉(CEA)可能与术后并发症增加有关,如尿道瘘和谷粒开裂。然而,随后的研究发现CEA与并发症增加之间没有关联。脊髓麻醉(SA)是另一种在尿道下裂修复过程中提供手术阻断的技术。然而,没有研究检查在清醒SA下进行尿道下裂修复的儿科患者的结果。方法:我们对2016年至2023年接受单期原发性尿道下裂修复术的所有患者进行了单中心回顾性研究。收集的数据包括患者人口统计、麻醉细节、尿道下裂严重程度、手术持续时间和术后并发症。结果:805例患者在研究期间接受了单期尿道下裂修复术。单纯GA 117例(14.5%),GA合并CEA 563例(70%),SA 125例(15.5%)。GA组和CEA组患者的手术时间明显长于SA组,GA组和CEA组患者的尿道下裂严重程度更高。我们没有发现两组之间术后并发症的优势比有显著差异。讨论:在我们的回顾性分析中,我们没有发现麻醉组之间在术后并发症发生率上的差异。SA患者较年轻,手术中位时间较短。由于SA的持续时间有限,对于病理更复杂的患者可能不提供SA作为一种选择。SA是一种未被充分利用的儿科泌尿外科手术技术,但在婴儿和幼儿方面比GA有一些好处。结论:SA可成功应用于小儿尿道下裂手术,且无术后并发症增加。由于患者组之间存在显著的基线差异,因此有必要对该主题进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书