Glucagon‑like peptide‑1 receptor agonists in multiple sclerosis: therapeutic promise, challenges, and future directions.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Afsaneh Shirani, Olaf Stuve
{"title":"Glucagon‑like peptide‑1 receptor agonists in multiple sclerosis: therapeutic promise, challenges, and future directions.","authors":"Afsaneh Shirani, Olaf Stuve","doi":"10.1080/13543784.2025.2587277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This review evaluates the potential of glucagon‑like peptide‑1 receptor agonists (GLP‑1RAs) - first developed for type 2 diabetes and later approved for chronic weight management and additional indications - to be repurposed as neuroprotective and remyelinating therapies in multiple sclerosis (MS). We synthesize emerging pre‑clinical and early clinical evidence, highlight practical barriers to translation, and outline directions for future research.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and toxin-induced demyelination mouse models, GLP-1RAs have been shown to reduce oxidative stress, preserve axonal integrity, suppress microglial and astrocytic activation, and, in some cases, promote remyelination. Early observational data in people with MS suggest GLP-1RAs are well tolerated, provide expected metabolic benefits, and do not exacerbate disease activity. Moreover, signals of reduced neurological impairment and lower dementia incidence in broader diabetic cohorts further support their translational promise. However, to date, there are no published randomized controlled trials of GLP-1RAs in MS.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Pre‑clinical and early clinical signals support GLP‑1RAs as promising candidates for neuroprotection in MS, yet definitive evidence of disease‑modifying efficacy is lacking. Practical barriers, such as drug availability and cost, together with unresolved mechanistic questions underscore the need for biomarker‑rich mechanistic trials. Rigorous prospective studies are essential to establish whether GLP‑1RAs can meaningfully alter the trajectory of MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":12313,"journal":{"name":"Expert opinion on investigational drugs","volume":" ","pages":"929-941"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert opinion on investigational drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13543784.2025.2587277","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This review evaluates the potential of glucagon‑like peptide‑1 receptor agonists (GLP‑1RAs) - first developed for type 2 diabetes and later approved for chronic weight management and additional indications - to be repurposed as neuroprotective and remyelinating therapies in multiple sclerosis (MS). We synthesize emerging pre‑clinical and early clinical evidence, highlight practical barriers to translation, and outline directions for future research.

Areas covered: In experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and toxin-induced demyelination mouse models, GLP-1RAs have been shown to reduce oxidative stress, preserve axonal integrity, suppress microglial and astrocytic activation, and, in some cases, promote remyelination. Early observational data in people with MS suggest GLP-1RAs are well tolerated, provide expected metabolic benefits, and do not exacerbate disease activity. Moreover, signals of reduced neurological impairment and lower dementia incidence in broader diabetic cohorts further support their translational promise. However, to date, there are no published randomized controlled trials of GLP-1RAs in MS.

Expert opinion: Pre‑clinical and early clinical signals support GLP‑1RAs as promising candidates for neuroprotection in MS, yet definitive evidence of disease‑modifying efficacy is lacking. Practical barriers, such as drug availability and cost, together with unresolved mechanistic questions underscore the need for biomarker‑rich mechanistic trials. Rigorous prospective studies are essential to establish whether GLP‑1RAs can meaningfully alter the trajectory of MS.

多发性硬化症中的胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂:治疗前景、挑战和未来方向
简介:本综述评估了胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP - 1RAs)的潜力——最初是为2型糖尿病开发的,后来被批准用于慢性体重管理——重新用于多发性硬化症(MS)的神经保护和髓鞘再生治疗。我们综合了新出现的临床前和早期临床证据,强调了翻译的实际障碍,并概述了未来研究的方向。涉及领域:在实验性自身免疫性脑脊髓炎和毒素诱导脱髓鞘小鼠模型中,GLP-1RAs已被证明可以减少氧化应激,保持轴突完整性,抑制小胶质细胞和星形胶质细胞的激活,在某些情况下,还可以促进髓鞘再生。MS患者的早期观察数据表明,GLP-1RAs耐受性良好,提供预期的代谢益处,并且不会加剧疾病活动。此外,在更广泛的糖尿病人群中减少神经损伤和降低痴呆发病率的信号进一步支持了它们的转化前景。然而,尚未对多发性硬化症进行随机对照试验。专家意见:临床前和早期临床信号支持GLP - 1RAs作为MS神经保护的有希望的候选者,但缺乏疾病改善功效的明确证据。实际障碍,如药物可获得性和成本,以及未解决的机制问题,强调了对富含生物标志物的机制试验的需求。严格的前瞻性研究对于确定GLP - 1RAs是否能有意义地改变MS的发展轨迹至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs (ISSN 1354-3784 [print], 1744-7658 [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles and original papers on drugs in preclinical and early stage clinical development, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development. The Editors welcome: Reviews covering preclinical through to Phase II data on drugs or drug classes for specific indications, and their potential impact on future treatment strategies Drug Evaluations reviewing the clinical and pharmacological data on a particular drug Original Research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on agents that are in Phase I and II clinical trials The audience consists of scientists, managers and decision-makers in the pharmaceutical industry, and others closely involved in R&D.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书