A controlled experiment with a medical student honor system.

F S Sierles, B D Kushner, P B Krause
{"title":"A controlled experiment with a medical student honor system.","authors":"F S Sierles,&nbsp;B D Kushner,&nbsp;P B Krause","doi":"10.1097/00001888-198809000-00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 1984 the student body at a midwestern medical school created an honor code and student honor council which supplemented the school's proctoring system. In consideration of recommending that the proctoring system be replaced by an honor system, the authors conducted a controlled experiment in which one trimester's behavioral science midterm and final examinations were unproctored and the midterm and final examinations in physiology and neuroscience were proctored. Using anonymous questionnaires, the authors discovered that significantly more students cheated and observed others cheating in behavioral science than in physiology or neuroscience examinations. Of 17 students who observed cheating, only two reported it, and they did so without providing the offenders' names.</p>","PeriodicalId":31052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education","volume":"63 9","pages":"705-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00001888-198809000-00006","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-198809000-00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

In 1984 the student body at a midwestern medical school created an honor code and student honor council which supplemented the school's proctoring system. In consideration of recommending that the proctoring system be replaced by an honor system, the authors conducted a controlled experiment in which one trimester's behavioral science midterm and final examinations were unproctored and the midterm and final examinations in physiology and neuroscience were proctored. Using anonymous questionnaires, the authors discovered that significantly more students cheated and observed others cheating in behavioral science than in physiology or neuroscience examinations. Of 17 students who observed cheating, only two reported it, and they did so without providing the offenders' names.

一个医学院学生荣誉制度的对照实验。
1984年,中西部一所医学院的学生团体制定了一套荣誉守则和学生荣誉委员会,以补充学校的监督制度。考虑到将监考制度改为荣誉制度的建议,作者进行了一个学期的行为科学期中和期末考试不进行监考,而生理学和神经科学期中和期末考试进行监考的对照实验。通过匿名问卷调查,作者发现,与生理学或神经科学考试相比,在行为科学考试中作弊和观察他人作弊的学生明显更多。在观察到作弊的17名学生中,只有两人报告了作弊行为,而且他们没有提供作弊者的姓名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信