Intellectual property at a crossroads: The knowledge and resources of indigenous peoples and local communities

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW
Jessica C. Lai, Evana Wright, Jordana R. Goodman
{"title":"Intellectual property at a crossroads: The knowledge and resources of indigenous peoples and local communities","authors":"Jessica C. Lai,&nbsp;Evana Wright,&nbsp;Jordana R. Goodman","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>On 24 May 2024, Member States of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) adopted the Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, and Associated Traditional Knowledge. While lauded as a victory for Indigenous peoples and local communities (IPLC), in this article we critique both the Treaty and its deficiencies, as well concerns of opponents of the Treaty. In addition, this article examines various ways forward in the plight of IPLC to protect their knowledge and knowledge systems, comparing and contrasting Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia and the United States, as three jurisdictions with comparable British colonial histories, but across the spectrum in terms of how their intellectual property law doctrines meet the interests of IPLC. The article warns that the Treaty might distract from meeting the deeper interests of IPLC and also that the typical paths forward are not without their disadvantages, including potentially perpetuating colonial constructs.</p>","PeriodicalId":54129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","volume":"28 3","pages":"885-913"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jwip.12359","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jwip.12359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On 24 May 2024, Member States of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) adopted the Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, and Associated Traditional Knowledge. While lauded as a victory for Indigenous peoples and local communities (IPLC), in this article we critique both the Treaty and its deficiencies, as well concerns of opponents of the Treaty. In addition, this article examines various ways forward in the plight of IPLC to protect their knowledge and knowledge systems, comparing and contrasting Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia and the United States, as three jurisdictions with comparable British colonial histories, but across the spectrum in terms of how their intellectual property law doctrines meet the interests of IPLC. The article warns that the Treaty might distract from meeting the deeper interests of IPLC and also that the typical paths forward are not without their disadvantages, including potentially perpetuating colonial constructs.

十字路口的知识产权:土著人民和地方社区的知识和资源
2024年5月24日,世界知识产权组织(WIPO)成员国通过了《知识产权、遗传资源和相关传统知识条约》。虽然这篇文章被称赞为土著人民和地方社区的胜利,但我们在这篇文章中批评了《条约》及其不足,以及《条约》反对者的关切。此外,本文还探讨了国际刑事法院在保护其知识和知识体系方面所面临的各种困境,并对新西兰、澳大利亚和美国这三个具有类似英国殖民历史的司法管辖区进行了比较和对比,但就其知识产权法理论如何符合国际刑事法院的利益而言,这三个司法管辖区之间存在着差异。这篇文章警告说,该条约可能会分散人们对满足国际图联更深层次利益的注意力,而且典型的前进道路并非没有缺点,包括可能使殖民结构永续存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书