The ESG Backlash and the Demand for ESG Mutual Funds

IF 1.1 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Quinn Curtis
{"title":"The ESG Backlash and the Demand for ESG Mutual Funds","authors":"Quinn Curtis","doi":"10.1111/jels.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The backlash to ESG investing is in full swing, with dozens of states enacting measures aimed at curtailing the consideration of environmental, social, and governance factors in their pension funds. Meanwhile, ESG mutual funds are experiencing net outflows after a period of lagging performance. Is this the end for ESG funds? This paper draws on the literature on mutual fund flows to study how the demand for ESG funds has changed over time and how that demand interacts with the political and legal backlash to ESG. It finds that ESG funds received significant positive flows, controlling for conventional predictors of fund flow, starting in 2017. This effect peaked in late 2019, much earlier than the publicly perceived decline of ESG. Abnormal investor preference for ESG funds disappeared in 2020, around the time of the Trump Department of Labor rule targeting ESG and then reappeared in 2021 before declining again. The excess demand for ESG was driven largely by institutional share classes, particularly pre-2021. While the positive effect of ESG branding on flows has disappeared, demand for ESG funds (controlling for past performance) has generally remained non-negative up to 2024. Most of the decline in excess demand for ESG funds predates the political backlash and state anti-ESG laws. Tests for a causal relationship between ESG fund flows and the political backlash, as measured by mentions of ESG in conservative media and state laws restricting ESG, show no statistical connection.</p>","PeriodicalId":47187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","volume":"22 4","pages":"690-706"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jels.70010","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jels.70010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The backlash to ESG investing is in full swing, with dozens of states enacting measures aimed at curtailing the consideration of environmental, social, and governance factors in their pension funds. Meanwhile, ESG mutual funds are experiencing net outflows after a period of lagging performance. Is this the end for ESG funds? This paper draws on the literature on mutual fund flows to study how the demand for ESG funds has changed over time and how that demand interacts with the political and legal backlash to ESG. It finds that ESG funds received significant positive flows, controlling for conventional predictors of fund flow, starting in 2017. This effect peaked in late 2019, much earlier than the publicly perceived decline of ESG. Abnormal investor preference for ESG funds disappeared in 2020, around the time of the Trump Department of Labor rule targeting ESG and then reappeared in 2021 before declining again. The excess demand for ESG was driven largely by institutional share classes, particularly pre-2021. While the positive effect of ESG branding on flows has disappeared, demand for ESG funds (controlling for past performance) has generally remained non-negative up to 2024. Most of the decline in excess demand for ESG funds predates the political backlash and state anti-ESG laws. Tests for a causal relationship between ESG fund flows and the political backlash, as measured by mentions of ESG in conservative media and state laws restricting ESG, show no statistical connection.

Abstract Image

ESG反弹和ESG共同基金需求
对ESG投资的抵制正如火如荼地进行,数十个州颁布了旨在减少其养老基金对环境、社会和治理因素考虑的措施。与此同时,ESG共同基金在经历了一段时间的滞后表现后,正经历净流出。这是ESG基金的末日吗?本文利用有关共同基金流动的文献,研究对ESG基金的需求如何随着时间的推移而变化,以及这种需求如何与对ESG的政治和法律反弹相互作用。研究发现,从2017年开始,ESG基金获得了显著的正流动,控制了传统的资金流动预测指标。这种影响在2019年底达到顶峰,比公众认为的ESG衰落要早得多。投资者对ESG基金的异常偏好在2020年特朗普劳工部出台针对ESG的规定前后消失,然后在2021年再次出现,然后再次下降。对ESG的过度需求主要是由机构股票类别推动的,尤其是在2021年之前。虽然ESG品牌对资金流动的积极影响已经消失,但到2024年,对ESG基金的需求(控制过去的业绩)总体上保持非负。ESG基金过剩需求的下降,大多发生在政治反弹和各州出台反ESG法律之前。对ESG资金流动与政治反弹之间因果关系的测试(通过保守媒体对ESG的提及和限制ESG的州法律来衡量)显示,没有统计上的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书