Dynamic Risk Spillover in International Real Estate Investment Trusts: Implications for Asset Investors

IF 2.3 Q2 ECONOMICS
Kwame Annin, Kofi Agyarko Ababio, Solomon Sarpong
{"title":"Dynamic Risk Spillover in International Real Estate Investment Trusts: Implications for Asset Investors","authors":"Kwame Annin,&nbsp;Kofi Agyarko Ababio,&nbsp;Solomon Sarpong","doi":"10.1007/s10690-024-09496-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The paper examines the extent of connectivity and shock transmission among twenty international public REITs using both static and dynamic econometric measures. The result shows that the dominant status of the United States REIT market as a primary source of shock to the international REIT market is in contest, mostly with the Belgian, Russian, and French REITs. Our results also indicate that Belgium, Germany, and France are the leading sources of shock in the European Union REIT market. Singapore dominates the ASEAN Economic Community REITs; the United States leads the North American Free Trade Agreement REITs while Russia and the United States compete as leaders in the Asia–Pacific Economic Cooperation REIT market. Results from the dynamic spillover demonstrate that return and the volatility spillover are vulnerable to key global news—positive or negative—with the COVID-19 pandemic having a substantial influence on international REITs than oil price shocks and geopolitical news. We further find out that altogether, the 20 international REITs are highly connected, and their level of linkages increases in periods of heightened global market uncertainties. However, the connectedness levels of the markets reduce among the economic blocs, suggesting that market integration, in the perspective of REITs, is not well-achieved under established economic groupings. We believe these findings are significant for the recalibration of the international REIT market as it resets itself from the uncertainties ushered in by the insurgency of the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings also have relevant implications for the investor community.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54095,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Financial Markets","volume":"32 4","pages":"1519 - 1550"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Financial Markets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10690-024-09496-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper examines the extent of connectivity and shock transmission among twenty international public REITs using both static and dynamic econometric measures. The result shows that the dominant status of the United States REIT market as a primary source of shock to the international REIT market is in contest, mostly with the Belgian, Russian, and French REITs. Our results also indicate that Belgium, Germany, and France are the leading sources of shock in the European Union REIT market. Singapore dominates the ASEAN Economic Community REITs; the United States leads the North American Free Trade Agreement REITs while Russia and the United States compete as leaders in the Asia–Pacific Economic Cooperation REIT market. Results from the dynamic spillover demonstrate that return and the volatility spillover are vulnerable to key global news—positive or negative—with the COVID-19 pandemic having a substantial influence on international REITs than oil price shocks and geopolitical news. We further find out that altogether, the 20 international REITs are highly connected, and their level of linkages increases in periods of heightened global market uncertainties. However, the connectedness levels of the markets reduce among the economic blocs, suggesting that market integration, in the perspective of REITs, is not well-achieved under established economic groupings. We believe these findings are significant for the recalibration of the international REIT market as it resets itself from the uncertainties ushered in by the insurgency of the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings also have relevant implications for the investor community.

国际房地产投资信托的动态风险溢出:对资产投资者的启示
本文采用静态和动态计量经济学方法考察了20个国际公共房地产投资信托基金之间的连通性和冲击传导程度。结果表明,美国房地产投资信托基金市场作为国际房地产投资信托基金市场主要冲击来源的主导地位正在与比利时、俄罗斯和法国房地产投资信托基金竞争。我们的研究结果还表明,比利时、德国和法国是欧盟REIT市场冲击的主要来源。新加坡主导着东盟经济共同体REITs;美国在北美自由贸易协定REITs中处于领先地位,而俄罗斯和美国在亚太经济合作组织REIT市场中处于领先地位。动态溢出的结果表明,回报率和波动性溢出很容易受到全球重大新闻(无论是积极的还是消极的)的影响,与油价冲击和地缘政治新闻相比,COVID-19大流行对国际REITs的影响更大。我们进一步发现,总的来说,20个国际房地产投资信托基金是高度联系的,并且它们的联系水平在全球市场不确定性加剧的时期增加。然而,经济集团之间的市场连通性水平降低,这表明在既定的经济集团下,房地产投资信托基金的市场整合并没有很好地实现。我们认为,这些发现对于重新调整国际房地产投资信托基金市场具有重要意义,因为它正在从COVID-19大流行带来的不确定性中重新调整自己。研究结果对投资者群体也有相关的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The current remarkable growth in the Asia-Pacific financial markets is certain to continue. These markets are expected to play a further important role in the world capital markets for investment and risk management. In accordance with this development, Asia-Pacific Financial Markets (formerly Financial Engineering and the Japanese Markets), the official journal of the Japanese Association of Financial Econometrics and Engineering (JAFEE), is expected to provide an international forum for researchers and practitioners in academia, industry, and government, who engage in empirical and/or theoretical research into the financial markets. We invite submission of quality papers on all aspects of finance and financial engineering. Here we interpret the term ''financial engineering'' broadly enough to cover such topics as financial time series, portfolio analysis, global asset allocation, trading strategy for investment, optimization methods, macro monetary economic analysis and pricing models for various financial assets including derivatives We stress that purely theoretical papers, as well as empirical studies that use Asia-Pacific market data, are welcome. Officially cited as: Asia-Pac Financ Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书