Design and Transferability of a Digital Training to Improve Generic and Domain-Specific Critical Online Reasoning

IF 1.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Anika Kohmer, Olga Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Jennifer Fischer, Marie-Theres Nagel
{"title":"Design and Transferability of a Digital Training to Improve Generic and Domain-Specific Critical Online Reasoning","authors":"Anika Kohmer,&nbsp;Olga Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia,&nbsp;Jennifer Fischer,&nbsp;Marie-Theres Nagel","doi":"10.1111/ijtd.12368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n <p>The Internet has become the main information source of graduates, trainees and young professionals, who use online information to base their professional decisions and actions. However, trainees often perform poorly when it comes to correctly evaluating the credibility of online media and critically dealing with online information, which can negatively impact their professional decisions and actions. Competent handling of online sources can only be achieved if trainees systematically learn to search for, critically evaluate and reason using high-quality information. Based on prior research, we define this skillset as ‘critical online reasoning’ (COR). In this study, a corresponding digital COR training was developed and implemented in the professional education of students in medicine, law and teacher training degrees. In these three domains, competent Internet use and COR skills play an increasingly significant role in professional practice. As prior research indicates, COR-related skills can be improved through targeted training. So far, however, existing tools have only addressed partial COR facets and mostly in a domain-independent manner; no comprehensive training addressing all online information processing stages for these three domains has been available. In this paper, the theory- and evidence-based conceptualization and implementation of the COR web-based training according to the five main phases of the well-established ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation) model of instructional design is presented. The COR training comprises tasks embedded into realistic search problems regarding relevant topics in the respective domains and thus provides an authentic learning environment. The initial evaluation findings indicate that the COR training can be transferred across and improve trainees' COR skills in the three domains. At the same time, some limitations became apparent, which led to calls for further development and the professionalization of training that is presented here.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46817,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Training and Development","volume":"29 4","pages":"403-418"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijtd.12368","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Training and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijtd.12368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Internet has become the main information source of graduates, trainees and young professionals, who use online information to base their professional decisions and actions. However, trainees often perform poorly when it comes to correctly evaluating the credibility of online media and critically dealing with online information, which can negatively impact their professional decisions and actions. Competent handling of online sources can only be achieved if trainees systematically learn to search for, critically evaluate and reason using high-quality information. Based on prior research, we define this skillset as ‘critical online reasoning’ (COR). In this study, a corresponding digital COR training was developed and implemented in the professional education of students in medicine, law and teacher training degrees. In these three domains, competent Internet use and COR skills play an increasingly significant role in professional practice. As prior research indicates, COR-related skills can be improved through targeted training. So far, however, existing tools have only addressed partial COR facets and mostly in a domain-independent manner; no comprehensive training addressing all online information processing stages for these three domains has been available. In this paper, the theory- and evidence-based conceptualization and implementation of the COR web-based training according to the five main phases of the well-established ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation) model of instructional design is presented. The COR training comprises tasks embedded into realistic search problems regarding relevant topics in the respective domains and thus provides an authentic learning environment. The initial evaluation findings indicate that the COR training can be transferred across and improve trainees' COR skills in the three domains. At the same time, some limitations became apparent, which led to calls for further development and the professionalization of training that is presented here.

Abstract Image

改进通用和特定领域关键在线推理的数字训练的设计和可转移性
互联网已成为毕业生、学员和年轻专业人员的主要信息来源,他们利用网络信息进行专业决策和行动。然而,在正确评估网络媒体的可信度和批判性地处理网络信息方面,学员往往表现不佳,这可能会对他们的专业决策和行动产生负面影响。只有当受训者系统地学习搜索、批判性地评估和使用高质量信息进行推理时,才能实现对在线资源的有效处理。基于先前的研究,我们将这种技能定义为“批判性在线推理”(COR)。本研究针对医学、法律及教师培训学位学生的专业教育,开发并实施相应的数位COR训练。在这三个领域中,称职的互联网使用和COR技能在专业实践中发挥着越来越重要的作用。先前的研究表明,通过有针对性的培训,可以提高cor相关技能。然而,到目前为止,现有的工具只解决了部分的COR方面,并且大多以领域独立的方式;目前还没有针对这三个领域所有在线信息处理阶段的综合培训。本文根据已建立的ADDIE(分析、设计、开发、实施、评估)教学设计模型的五个主要阶段,提出了基于理论和循证的COR网络培训的概念和实施。COR培训包括嵌入到实际搜索问题的任务,涉及各自领域的相关主题,从而提供了一个真实的学习环境。初步的评估结果表明,在这三个领域中,培训可以跨领域进行,并提高受训者的COR技能。与此同时,一些限制也变得明显起来,这导致人们要求进一步发展和使本文所述的培训专业化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Increasing international competition has led governments and corporations to focus on ways of improving national and corporate economic performance. The effective use of human resources is seen as a prerequisite, and the training and development of employees as paramount. The growth of training and development as an academic subject reflects its growth in practice. The International Journal of Training and Development is an international forum for the reporting of high-quality, original, empirical research. Multidisciplinary, international and comparative, the journal publishes research which ranges from the theoretical, conceptual and methodological to more policy-oriented types of work. The scope of the Journal is training and development, broadly defined. This includes: The determinants of training specifying and testing the explanatory variables which may be related to training identifying and analysing specific factors which give rise to a need for training and development as well as the processes by which those needs become defined, for example, training needs analysis the need for performance improvement the training and development implications of various performance improvement techniques, such as appraisal and assessment the analysis of competence Training and development practice the design, development and delivery of training the learning and development process itself competency-based approaches evaluation: the relationship between training and individual, corporate and macroeconomic performance Policy and strategy organisational aspects of training and development public policy issues questions of infrastructure issues relating to the training and development profession The Journal’s scope encompasses both corporate and public policy analysis. International and comparative work is particularly welcome, as is research which embraces emerging issues and developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书