Progestogen-only contraception use during breastfeeding: an updated systematic review.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Angeline Ti, Sylvia Ayieko, Mercedes Bonet
{"title":"Progestogen-only contraception use during breastfeeding: an updated systematic review.","authors":"Angeline Ti, Sylvia Ayieko, Mercedes Bonet","doi":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2025-202837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review aimed to update a 2016 review and answer two questions: (1) Among breastfeeding women, does the use of progestogen-only contraception (POC) (ie, pills, injectables, implants, hormonal intrauterine devices) increase the risk of poor breastfeeding or infant outcomes compared with those not using POC? (2) Among breastfeeding women, does the initiation of POC before 6 weeks postpartum increase the risk of poor breastfeeding or infant outcomes compared with the initiation of POC at 6 weeks or later?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov and CINAHL) from inception to 6 September 2023. We extracted data and assessed risk of bias (RoB) for each study and certainty of evidence for each outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one articles met the inclusion criteria; 11 were newly identified since the previous review, most with high RoB. Nine new randomised and non-randomised studies assessing breastfeeding and/or infant outcomes met the inclusion criteria for Question 1. Two new randomised studies assessing breastfeeding and/or infant outcomes met the inclusion criteria for Question 2, examining early versus late initiation of the implant. One new article for each objective included preterm infants. For both questions, studies continue to find no significant adverse effects on breastfeeding (eg, continuation, supplementation, duration) or infant (eg, growth, illness) outcomes. The certainty of evidence ranged from very low to moderate across outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This updated systematic review provides additional evidence for the safety of POC use during breastfeeding. Newly identified studies are consistent with the prior review in suggesting no consistent findings of adverse effects, while adding evidence for preterm infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":9219,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","volume":"51 Suppl 1","pages":"s4-s17"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12703263/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2025-202837","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This systematic review aimed to update a 2016 review and answer two questions: (1) Among breastfeeding women, does the use of progestogen-only contraception (POC) (ie, pills, injectables, implants, hormonal intrauterine devices) increase the risk of poor breastfeeding or infant outcomes compared with those not using POC? (2) Among breastfeeding women, does the initiation of POC before 6 weeks postpartum increase the risk of poor breastfeeding or infant outcomes compared with the initiation of POC at 6 weeks or later?

Methods: We searched multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov and CINAHL) from inception to 6 September 2023. We extracted data and assessed risk of bias (RoB) for each study and certainty of evidence for each outcome.

Results: Sixty-one articles met the inclusion criteria; 11 were newly identified since the previous review, most with high RoB. Nine new randomised and non-randomised studies assessing breastfeeding and/or infant outcomes met the inclusion criteria for Question 1. Two new randomised studies assessing breastfeeding and/or infant outcomes met the inclusion criteria for Question 2, examining early versus late initiation of the implant. One new article for each objective included preterm infants. For both questions, studies continue to find no significant adverse effects on breastfeeding (eg, continuation, supplementation, duration) or infant (eg, growth, illness) outcomes. The certainty of evidence ranged from very low to moderate across outcomes.

Conclusions: This updated systematic review provides additional evidence for the safety of POC use during breastfeeding. Newly identified studies are consistent with the prior review in suggesting no consistent findings of adverse effects, while adding evidence for preterm infants.

Abstract Image

母乳喂养期间仅使用孕激素避孕:一项最新的系统综述。
目的:本系统综述旨在更新2016年的综述并回答两个问题:(1)在母乳喂养的妇女中,使用单孕激素避孕(POC)(即药片、注射剂、植入物、激素宫内节育器)与不使用POC的妇女相比,是否会增加不良母乳喂养或婴儿结局的风险?(2)在母乳喂养妇女中,产后6周前开始POC与产后6周及以后开始POC相比,是否会增加母乳喂养不良或婴儿结局的风险?方法:检索自成立至2023年9月6日的多个数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane、ClinicalTrials.gov和CINAHL)。我们提取数据并评估每个研究的偏倚风险(RoB)和每个结果的证据确定性。结果:61篇文章符合纳入标准;自上次审查以来新发现的11个,大多数具有高罗伯。评估母乳喂养和/或婴儿结局的9项新的随机和非随机研究符合问题1的纳入标准。两项评估母乳喂养和/或婴儿结局的新随机研究符合问题2的纳入标准,检查早期和晚期植入物的开始。每个目标都有一篇新文章包括早产儿。对于这两个问题,研究继续发现对母乳喂养(例如,继续,补充,持续时间)或婴儿(例如,生长,疾病)结局没有明显的不利影响。证据的确定性从非常低到中等程度不等。结论:这一更新的系统综述为母乳喂养期间使用POC的安全性提供了额外的证据。新发现的研究与先前的综述一致,认为没有一致的不良反应发现,同时增加了早产儿的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health Medicine-Reproductive Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health is a multiprofessional journal that promotes sexual and reproductive health and wellbeing, and best contraceptive practice, worldwide. It publishes research, debate and comment to inform policy and practice, and recognises the importance of professional-patient partnership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书