Using responsive evaluation to shape research: Engaging and collaborating with stakeholders in the international symposium on multimorbidity.

IF 2.7
Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity Pub Date : 2025-10-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26335565251388513
Nina Grede, Christiane Muth, Maria Hanf, Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga, José Maria Valderas, Svetlana Puzhko, Marjan van den Akker
{"title":"Using responsive evaluation to shape research: Engaging and collaborating with stakeholders in the international symposium on multimorbidity.","authors":"Nina Grede, Christiane Muth, Maria Hanf, Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga, José Maria Valderas, Svetlana Puzhko, Marjan van den Akker","doi":"10.1177/26335565251388513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multimorbidity (MM) is a growing global public health issue requiring interdisciplinary collaboration among researchers, healthcare professionals, policymakers, and patients. The third International Symposium on Multimorbidity, held in May 2024 in Bielefeld, Germany, provided a platform for knowledge exchange and stakeholder engagement to address key challenges in MM research and care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The symposium followed a structured responsive evaluation approach with continuous stakeholder involvement. A pre-symposium survey was distributed to 116 international experts in the potential target audience; 85 responded, identifying the most pressing topics in MM. The lack of direct patient and policy maker involvement may have influenced the prioritization of certain topics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key topics included medication management, coordinated and personalized care, methods for measuring MM, applications of artificial intelligence, and concerns regarding overdiagnosis and overtreatment. These results informed the symposium agenda, ensuring relevance to the professional community. Participants from 16 countries attended, reflecting widespread international interest. A post-symposium survey (response rate: 19%) indicated high satisfaction; 85.5% of respondents would recommend the event. Feedback highlighted the need for broader topic coverage, more practical applications, and enhanced networking opportunities. Limitations included the low response rate for the post-symposium survey and potential self-selection bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The symposium effectively facilitated discussion and knowledge exchange through a structured, stakeholder-driven format. Recommendations for future events include expanding topic variety, integrating practical components, improving logistics, and incorporating real-time feedback tools. These insights support ongoing advancements in MM research, policy, and clinical practice, emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary and participant-centered approaches in academic event planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":73843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity","volume":"15 ","pages":"26335565251388513"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12579111/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26335565251388513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multimorbidity (MM) is a growing global public health issue requiring interdisciplinary collaboration among researchers, healthcare professionals, policymakers, and patients. The third International Symposium on Multimorbidity, held in May 2024 in Bielefeld, Germany, provided a platform for knowledge exchange and stakeholder engagement to address key challenges in MM research and care.

Methods: The symposium followed a structured responsive evaluation approach with continuous stakeholder involvement. A pre-symposium survey was distributed to 116 international experts in the potential target audience; 85 responded, identifying the most pressing topics in MM. The lack of direct patient and policy maker involvement may have influenced the prioritization of certain topics.

Results: Key topics included medication management, coordinated and personalized care, methods for measuring MM, applications of artificial intelligence, and concerns regarding overdiagnosis and overtreatment. These results informed the symposium agenda, ensuring relevance to the professional community. Participants from 16 countries attended, reflecting widespread international interest. A post-symposium survey (response rate: 19%) indicated high satisfaction; 85.5% of respondents would recommend the event. Feedback highlighted the need for broader topic coverage, more practical applications, and enhanced networking opportunities. Limitations included the low response rate for the post-symposium survey and potential self-selection bias.

Conclusion: The symposium effectively facilitated discussion and knowledge exchange through a structured, stakeholder-driven format. Recommendations for future events include expanding topic variety, integrating practical components, improving logistics, and incorporating real-time feedback tools. These insights support ongoing advancements in MM research, policy, and clinical practice, emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary and participant-centered approaches in academic event planning.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用响应性评价来塑造研究:参与和合作的利益攸关方在国际研讨会上的多病。
背景:多发性疾病(MM)是一个日益严重的全球公共卫生问题,需要研究人员、卫生保健专业人员、政策制定者和患者之间的跨学科合作。第三届多病国际研讨会于2024年5月在德国比勒费尔德举行,为知识交流和利益相关者参与提供了一个平台,以解决MM研究和护理中的关键挑战。方法:研讨会遵循了一个结构化的响应性评估方法,持续的利益相关者参与。向潜在目标受众中的116名国际专家分发了一份专题讨论会前调查;85个答复,确定了MM中最紧迫的主题。缺乏患者和决策者的直接参与可能影响了某些主题的优先顺序。结果:关键主题包括药物管理、协调和个性化护理、MM测量方法、人工智能应用以及对过度诊断和过度治疗的担忧。这些结果为专题讨论会的议程提供了信息,确保了与专业团体的相关性。来自16个国家的与会者参加了会议,反映了国际社会的广泛兴趣。研讨会后的调查(回复率:19%)表明满意度很高;85.5%的受访者会推荐该活动。反馈强调需要更广泛的主题覆盖、更实际的应用和更多的联网机会。局限性包括研讨会后调查的低回复率和潜在的自我选择偏差。结论:研讨会通过结构化的、利益相关者驱动的形式有效地促进了讨论和知识交流。对未来活动的建议包括扩大主题种类、整合实用组件、改善后勤和整合实时反馈工具。这些见解支持了MM研究、政策和临床实践的持续进步,强调了跨学科和以参与者为中心的方法在学术活动规划中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书