Endoscopic management of biliary leakage after hepatectomy and analysis of its influencing factors.

IF 1.2 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Pub Date : 2025-10-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26317745251388159
Zongyan Li, Weidong Pan, Guozhi Xu, Zuxiao Chen, Lei Zhang, Zheyu Zheng, Xiaoming Huang, Liangqi Cao, Dawei Zhang
{"title":"Endoscopic management of biliary leakage after hepatectomy and analysis of its influencing factors.","authors":"Zongyan Li, Weidong Pan, Guozhi Xu, Zuxiao Chen, Lei Zhang, Zheyu Zheng, Xiaoming Huang, Liangqi Cao, Dawei Zhang","doi":"10.1177/26317745251388159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bile leakage following hepatectomy is a challenging issue that poses difficulties for hepatobiliary surgeons. Endoscopic treatment is the primary method for managing this complication, although its effectiveness is still uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and risk factors of endoscopic treatment for bile leakage after hepatectomy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was performed on 15 patients who experienced bile leakage following hepatectomy and were successfully treated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP). The primary focus was to examine how factors like the site of bile leakage, the position of biliary drainage, and late-set leakage impact early clinical success (ECS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 15 cases, 10 successfully achieved ECS through endoscopic treatment. The highest success rate (80.0%, 4 out of 5) was seen when biliary drainage was performed by bridging, while drainage placed near the leakage site had a success rate of 75.0% (6 out of 8). The best outcomes occurred when bile leakage was located in the tertiary or higher branch bile ducts, with an 83.3% success rate (5 out of 6). Additionally, early-onset leakage had a higher ECS success rate compared to late-onset bile leakage (75.0% (6/8) vs 57.1% (4/7)). Among the 15 cases, 12 involved extensive liver resections of more than two segments, 14 included segments 7 or 8, 11 had received preoperative adjuvant therapy, and 9 had undergone transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). In cases with late-onset bile leakage, 6 out of 7 (85.7%) had undergone TACE. Bile leakage caused by TACE was more likely to be accompanied by bile duct-bronchial fistula, and the healing process took significantly longer.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Endoscopic management of bile leakage following liver resection is both safe and effective, making it a preferred first-line treatment. Improved results can be obtained by placing a stent to bridge and drain near the leakage site. Extensive liver resection, resection involving segments 7 or 8 of the liver, and preoperative adjuvant therapies are significant risk factors for bile leakage, particularly TACE, which may lead to bile duct-bronchial fistulas and extended recovery periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":40947,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"18 ","pages":"26317745251388159"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12579157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26317745251388159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bile leakage following hepatectomy is a challenging issue that poses difficulties for hepatobiliary surgeons. Endoscopic treatment is the primary method for managing this complication, although its effectiveness is still uncertain.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and risk factors of endoscopic treatment for bile leakage after hepatectomy.

Design: A retrospective cohort study.

Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 15 patients who experienced bile leakage following hepatectomy and were successfully treated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP). The primary focus was to examine how factors like the site of bile leakage, the position of biliary drainage, and late-set leakage impact early clinical success (ECS).

Results: Out of the 15 cases, 10 successfully achieved ECS through endoscopic treatment. The highest success rate (80.0%, 4 out of 5) was seen when biliary drainage was performed by bridging, while drainage placed near the leakage site had a success rate of 75.0% (6 out of 8). The best outcomes occurred when bile leakage was located in the tertiary or higher branch bile ducts, with an 83.3% success rate (5 out of 6). Additionally, early-onset leakage had a higher ECS success rate compared to late-onset bile leakage (75.0% (6/8) vs 57.1% (4/7)). Among the 15 cases, 12 involved extensive liver resections of more than two segments, 14 included segments 7 or 8, 11 had received preoperative adjuvant therapy, and 9 had undergone transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). In cases with late-onset bile leakage, 6 out of 7 (85.7%) had undergone TACE. Bile leakage caused by TACE was more likely to be accompanied by bile duct-bronchial fistula, and the healing process took significantly longer.

Conclusion: Endoscopic management of bile leakage following liver resection is both safe and effective, making it a preferred first-line treatment. Improved results can be obtained by placing a stent to bridge and drain near the leakage site. Extensive liver resection, resection involving segments 7 or 8 of the liver, and preoperative adjuvant therapies are significant risk factors for bile leakage, particularly TACE, which may lead to bile duct-bronchial fistulas and extended recovery periods.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肝切除术后胆漏的内镜治疗及影响因素分析。
背景:肝切除术后胆漏是一个具有挑战性的问题,给肝胆外科医生带来了困难。内窥镜治疗是处理这种并发症的主要方法,尽管其有效性仍不确定。目的:本研究的目的是评估内镜治疗肝切除术后胆漏的有效性和危险因素。设计:回顾性队列研究。方法:对15例肝切除术后胆漏患者行内镜逆行胆道造影(ERCP)治疗的临床资料进行回顾性分析。研究的主要重点是研究胆漏部位、胆道引流位置和晚期胆漏等因素如何影响早期临床成功(ECS)。结果:15例患者中,10例经内镜治疗成功达到ECS。胆道桥接引流成功率最高(80.0%,4 / 5),靠近渗漏部位引流成功率为75.0%(6 / 8)。胆漏位于第三支或更高支胆管时效果最好,成功率为83.3%(5 / 6)。此外,早发性胆漏的ECS成功率高于晚发性胆漏(75.0% (6/8)vs 57.1%(4/7))。在15例中,12例为2节段以上的广泛肝切除,14例为7节段或8节段,11例术前辅助治疗,9例行经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)。迟发性胆漏7例中有6例(85.7%)行TACE治疗。TACE引起的胆漏更容易伴有胆管-支气管瘘,且愈合时间明显延长。结论:内镜下治疗肝切除术后胆漏安全有效,是首选的一线治疗方法。通过在泄漏部位附近放置支架进行桥接和引流,可以获得更好的结果。广泛肝切除、肝7节段或肝8节段切除及术前辅助治疗是胆漏的重要危险因素,尤其是TACE,可导致胆管-支气管瘘,延长恢复期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书