Revision of below-knee amputation stumps to a higher level in patients with peripheral vascular disease

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Vascular Surgery Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2025.10.026
Mina Abdelmalak MBChB, MSc, FRCS , Louise M. Finch MBChB, MPhil, MRCS , Haydn Richards MBChB , Mark Tawadrous MBChB , Ragai Makar MBChB, MSc, MD, FRCS
{"title":"Revision of below-knee amputation stumps to a higher level in patients with peripheral vascular disease","authors":"Mina Abdelmalak MBChB, MSc, FRCS ,&nbsp;Louise M. Finch MBChB, MPhil, MRCS ,&nbsp;Haydn Richards MBChB ,&nbsp;Mark Tawadrous MBChB ,&nbsp;Ragai Makar MBChB, MSc, MD, FRCS","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.10.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate clinical and anatomical factors associated with failure of below-knee amputation (BKA) resulting in revision to a higher level amputation, with the aim of identifying predictors of stump healing and reducing the need for reoperation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective single-center study included all patients who underwent a BKA between April 2014 and October 2021 for peripheral vascular disease excluding other etiologies, such as burns, trauma, or malignancy. Patients were stratified into two groups based on whether revision surgery was required. Demographic characteristics, clinical indications, prior revascularization, arterial imaging, laboratory parameters, and inpatient outcomes were compared between groups. The primary outcome was the need for revision surgery. Statistical analyses were performed using Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test or <em>t</em> test for continuous variables. Significance was set at a <em>P</em> value of &lt;.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 212 patients underwent BKA during the study period using long posterior flaps. Of these, 48 patients (22.6%) required revision surgery, predominantly to above-knee amputation (73%). No significant differences in age, gender, comorbidities, or smoking status were observed between groups. Indications for initial BKA were comparable; however, patients with uncontrolled infection as the primary indication had a significantly lower revision rate (15% vs 30%; <em>P</em> = .04). Revascularization procedures were performed in 42% of patients but were not associated with revision risk. Arterial patency was a key differentiator. Patent profunda femoris artery (PFA) and common iliac artery were significantly more prevalent in the healed group (PFA, 73% vs 35% [<em>P</em> &lt; .0001]; common iliac artery, 84% vs 58% [<em>P</em> = .0003]). A diseased or occluded PFA was significantly more common in patients requiring revision. Unexpectedly, superficial femoral artery occlusion was more common in the healed group (27% vs 8%; <em>P</em> = .006), suggesting collateral-dependent perfusion. Preoperative blood parameters did not correlate with healing. Length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the revision group (31 days vs 22 days; <em>P</em> = .0017).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Approximately one in four patients undergoing BKA required revision. Patency of the PFA emerged as the strongest predictor of stump healing, highlighting the importance of preoperative vascular assessment. Consideration should be given to performing profundoplasty before BKA in cases with compromised profunda flow to improve outcomes and reduce the need for higher-level amputations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":"83 3","pages":"Pages 859-865"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0741521425018646","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate clinical and anatomical factors associated with failure of below-knee amputation (BKA) resulting in revision to a higher level amputation, with the aim of identifying predictors of stump healing and reducing the need for reoperation.

Methods

This retrospective single-center study included all patients who underwent a BKA between April 2014 and October 2021 for peripheral vascular disease excluding other etiologies, such as burns, trauma, or malignancy. Patients were stratified into two groups based on whether revision surgery was required. Demographic characteristics, clinical indications, prior revascularization, arterial imaging, laboratory parameters, and inpatient outcomes were compared between groups. The primary outcome was the need for revision surgery. Statistical analyses were performed using Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U test or t test for continuous variables. Significance was set at a P value of <.05.

Results

A total of 212 patients underwent BKA during the study period using long posterior flaps. Of these, 48 patients (22.6%) required revision surgery, predominantly to above-knee amputation (73%). No significant differences in age, gender, comorbidities, or smoking status were observed between groups. Indications for initial BKA were comparable; however, patients with uncontrolled infection as the primary indication had a significantly lower revision rate (15% vs 30%; P = .04). Revascularization procedures were performed in 42% of patients but were not associated with revision risk. Arterial patency was a key differentiator. Patent profunda femoris artery (PFA) and common iliac artery were significantly more prevalent in the healed group (PFA, 73% vs 35% [P < .0001]; common iliac artery, 84% vs 58% [P = .0003]). A diseased or occluded PFA was significantly more common in patients requiring revision. Unexpectedly, superficial femoral artery occlusion was more common in the healed group (27% vs 8%; P = .006), suggesting collateral-dependent perfusion. Preoperative blood parameters did not correlate with healing. Length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the revision group (31 days vs 22 days; P = .0017).

Conclusions

Approximately one in four patients undergoing BKA required revision. Patency of the PFA emerged as the strongest predictor of stump healing, highlighting the importance of preoperative vascular assessment. Consideration should be given to performing profundoplasty before BKA in cases with compromised profunda flow to improve outcomes and reduce the need for higher-level amputations.
外周血管疾病患者膝下截肢残端修复至更高水平。
目的:评估与膝下截肢(BKA)失败导致更高水平截肢相关的临床和解剖学因素,旨在确定残端愈合的预测因素并减少再次手术的需要。方法:这项回顾性单中心研究纳入了2014年4月至2021年10月期间因周围血管疾病(不包括烧伤、创伤或恶性肿瘤等其他病因)接受BKA的所有患者。根据是否需要翻修手术将患者分为两组。比较两组患者的人口学特征、临床适应症、既往血运重建、动脉成像、实验室参数和住院结果。主要结果是需要翻修手术。统计分析对分类变量采用Fisher精确检验,对连续变量采用Mann-Whitney U检验或t检验。p < 0.05为显著性。结果:研究期间共有212例患者使用长后瓣进行了BKA。其中,48例(22.6%)患者需要翻修手术,主要是膝关节以上截肢(73%)。各组之间在年龄、性别、合并症或吸烟状况方面无显著差异。初始BKA适应症具有可比性;然而,以感染不受控制为主要指征的患者翻修率明显较低(15%对30%,p = 0.04)。42%的患者进行了血管重建手术,但与翻修风险无关。动脉通畅是一个关键的鉴别指标。股深未闭动脉(PFA)和髂总动脉(CIA)在愈合组中更为普遍(PFA: 73% vs. 35%, p < 0.0001; CIA: 84% vs. 58%, p = 0.0003)。病变或闭塞的PFA在需要翻修的患者中更为常见。出乎意料的是,愈合组的股浅动脉(SFA)闭塞更频繁(27%比8%,p = 0.006),提示侧枝依赖性灌注。术前血液参数与愈合无相关性。改良组住院时间明显更长(31天比22天,p = 0.0017)。结论:大约四分之一的BKA患者需要翻修。PFA通畅成为残端愈合的最强预测指标,强调了术前血管评估的重要性。对于深静脉血流受损的病例,应考虑在BKA之前进行深静脉成形术,以改善结果并减少更高水平截肢的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书