Maternal and Microbiological Outcomes in GBS-Positive Patients Receiving Intrapartum Ampicillin versus Clindamycin: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-30 DOI:10.1159/000549302
Raneen Abu Shqara, Shany Or, Gabriela Goldinfeld, Nadir Ganem, Lior Lowenstein, Maya Frank Wolf
{"title":"Maternal and Microbiological Outcomes in GBS-Positive Patients Receiving Intrapartum Ampicillin versus Clindamycin: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Raneen Abu Shqara, Shany Or, Gabriela Goldinfeld, Nadir Ganem, Lior Lowenstein, Maya Frank Wolf","doi":"10.1159/000549302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><p>Objectives: Early-onset Group B Streptococcus (GBS) infection is a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality, which can be prevented through intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP). First-line β-lactams (penicillin or ampicillin) are preferred, whereas clindamycin is reserved for patients with a confirmed high-risk penicillin allergy and documented susceptibility. Increasing clindamycin resistance and concerns about intra-amniotic efficacy highlight the need to evaluate maternal outcomes. This study examined maternal infectious morbidity, neonatal outcomes, and microbiological findings in GBS-positive term patients receiving ampicillin versus clindamycin IAP.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted between March 2021 and March 2024 at a tertiary university-affiliated hospital. Participants/Materials: Singleton term pregnancies (≥37 weeks) with a documented positive GBS vaginal-rectal culture obtained within 5 weeks before delivery were included. Patients received either ampicillin (n = 1,833) according to the institutional protocol or clindamycin (n = 78) if they reported a severe β-lactam allergy. No intrapartum clindamycin susceptibility testing was performed.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was conducted at a tertiary university-affiliated hospital between March 2021 and March 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The co-primary outcomes were clinical chorioamnionitis and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Secondary maternal outcomes included intrapartum fever, postpartum fever, postpartum antibiotic administration use, and cesarean delivery. Secondary neonatal outcomes included a 5-min Apgar score of <7, umbilical cord pH at <7.1, respiratory distress, and ventilatory support. Chorioamniotic swabs were obtained after delivery. Data were analyzed using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables, t tests or Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables, and multivariable logistic regression to identify independent predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline maternal and obstetric characteristics were similar. Compared with ampicillin, clindamycin was associated with significantly higher rates of intrapartum fever (23.1% vs. 2.3%, p < 0.001), clinical chorioamnionitis (9.0% vs. 0.5%, p < 0.001), postpartum fever (5.1% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.001), and postpartum antibiotic use (7.6% vs. 0.8%, p < 0.001). Cesarean delivery rates did not differ significantly (19.2% vs. 11.6%, p = 0.084). NICU admission and other neonatal outcomes were comparable. Compared with ampicillin, clindamycin IAP was identified as a strong independent predictor of clinical chorioamnionitis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 20.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.6-61.4, p < 0.001), together with prolonged rupture of membranes >18 h (aOR 4.9, 95% CI 1.6-15.7, p = 0.006) and cervical ripening by catheter balloon (aOR 4.1, 95% CI 1.2-13.6, p = 0.023). Postpartum, GBS-positive chorioamniotic cultures were significantly more frequent among patients who received clindamycin compared with those who received ampicillin (28.2% vs. 10.5%; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This retrospective, single-center study may be subject to bias and has limited generalizability. The small clindamycin group reduced the power for rare outcomes. Penicillin allergy was self-reported without confirmatory testing, and clindamycin susceptibility was not assessed intrapartum.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among GBS-positive term patients, intrapartum clindamycin prophylaxis was associated with markedly higher maternal infectious morbidity and increased GBS detection in chorioamniotic cultures compared with ampicillin, without significant differences in neonatal outcomes. These findings raise concerns about the intra-amniotic effectiveness of clindamycin and support minimizing its use whenever possible. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings and to evaluate alternative prophylactic regimens for patients with penicillin allergy. </p>.</p>","PeriodicalId":12952,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"331-338"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12707870/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000549302","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Early-onset Group B Streptococcus (GBS) infection is a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality, which can be prevented through intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP). First-line β-lactams (penicillin or ampicillin) are preferred, whereas clindamycin is reserved for patients with a confirmed high-risk penicillin allergy and documented susceptibility. Increasing clindamycin resistance and concerns about intra-amniotic efficacy highlight the need to evaluate maternal outcomes. This study examined maternal infectious morbidity, neonatal outcomes, and microbiological findings in GBS-positive term patients receiving ampicillin versus clindamycin IAP.

Design: This retrospective cohort study was conducted between March 2021 and March 2024 at a tertiary university-affiliated hospital. Participants/Materials: Singleton term pregnancies (≥37 weeks) with a documented positive GBS vaginal-rectal culture obtained within 5 weeks before delivery were included. Patients received either ampicillin (n = 1,833) according to the institutional protocol or clindamycin (n = 78) if they reported a severe β-lactam allergy. No intrapartum clindamycin susceptibility testing was performed.

Setting: The study was conducted at a tertiary university-affiliated hospital between March 2021 and March 2024.

Methods: The co-primary outcomes were clinical chorioamnionitis and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Secondary maternal outcomes included intrapartum fever, postpartum fever, postpartum antibiotic administration use, and cesarean delivery. Secondary neonatal outcomes included a 5-min Apgar score of <7, umbilical cord pH at <7.1, respiratory distress, and ventilatory support. Chorioamniotic swabs were obtained after delivery. Data were analyzed using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables, t tests or Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables, and multivariable logistic regression to identify independent predictors.

Results: Baseline maternal and obstetric characteristics were similar. Compared with ampicillin, clindamycin was associated with significantly higher rates of intrapartum fever (23.1% vs. 2.3%, p < 0.001), clinical chorioamnionitis (9.0% vs. 0.5%, p < 0.001), postpartum fever (5.1% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.001), and postpartum antibiotic use (7.6% vs. 0.8%, p < 0.001). Cesarean delivery rates did not differ significantly (19.2% vs. 11.6%, p = 0.084). NICU admission and other neonatal outcomes were comparable. Compared with ampicillin, clindamycin IAP was identified as a strong independent predictor of clinical chorioamnionitis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 20.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.6-61.4, p < 0.001), together with prolonged rupture of membranes >18 h (aOR 4.9, 95% CI 1.6-15.7, p = 0.006) and cervical ripening by catheter balloon (aOR 4.1, 95% CI 1.2-13.6, p = 0.023). Postpartum, GBS-positive chorioamniotic cultures were significantly more frequent among patients who received clindamycin compared with those who received ampicillin (28.2% vs. 10.5%; p < 0.001).

Limitations: This retrospective, single-center study may be subject to bias and has limited generalizability. The small clindamycin group reduced the power for rare outcomes. Penicillin allergy was self-reported without confirmatory testing, and clindamycin susceptibility was not assessed intrapartum.

Conclusions: Among GBS-positive term patients, intrapartum clindamycin prophylaxis was associated with markedly higher maternal infectious morbidity and increased GBS detection in chorioamniotic cultures compared with ampicillin, without significant differences in neonatal outcomes. These findings raise concerns about the intra-amniotic effectiveness of clindamycin and support minimizing its use whenever possible. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings and to evaluate alternative prophylactic regimens for patients with penicillin allergy.

.

产时接受氨苄青霉素治疗的gbs阳性患者的母体和微生物预后。克林霉素:回顾性队列研究。
目的:早发性B族链球菌(GBS)感染是新生儿发病和死亡的主要原因,可通过产时抗生素预防(IAP)加以预防。首选一线β-内酰胺类药物(青霉素或氨苄西林),而克林霉素仅用于确诊的高危青霉素过敏和有记录的易感性患者。不断增加的克林霉素耐药性和对羊膜内疗效的关注突出了评估产妇结局的必要性。本研究检查了接受氨苄西林与克林霉素IAP的gbs阳性患者的产妇感染发病率、新生儿结局和微生物学结果。设计:本回顾性队列研究于2021年3月至2024年3月在某大专附属医院进行。参与者/材料:包括分娩前5周内GBS阴道直肠培养阳性的单胎足月妊娠(≥37周)。根据机构方案,患者接受氨苄西林(n = 1833)或克林霉素(n = 78)治疗,如果他们报告严重的β-内酰胺过敏。未进行产时克林霉素药敏试验。环境:研究于2021年3月至2024年3月在一所三级大学附属医院进行。方法:共同主要结局是临床绒毛膜羊膜炎和入住新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)。次要产妇结局包括产时发热、产后发热、产后抗生素使用和剖宫产。新生儿次要结局包括5分钟Apgar评分结果:基线产妇和产科特征相似。与氨苄西林相比,克林霉素与产时发热(23.1% vs. 2.3%, p18小时(aOR 4.9, 95% CI 1.6-15.7, p=0.006)和宫颈导管球囊成熟(aOR 4.1, 95% CI 1.2-13.6, p=0.023)相关。产后,使用克林霉素的患者比使用氨苄西林的患者更容易出现gbs阳性的绒毛膜羊膜培养(28.2%比10.5%,p < 0.001)。局限性:这项回顾性的单中心研究可能存在偏倚,并且具有有限的通用性。小剂量克林霉素组降低了治疗效果。青霉素过敏是自我报告的,没有证实性的测试,也没有在分娩时评估克林霉素的敏感性。结论:在GBS阳性的足月患者中,与氨苄西林相比,产时克林霉素预防与母体感染发病率和绒毛膜羊膜培养中GBS检出率显著升高相关,在新生儿结局方面无显著差异。这些发现引起了人们对克林霉素羊膜内有效性的关注,并支持尽可能减少其使用。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来证实这些发现,并评估青霉素过敏患者的替代预防方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal covers the most active and promising areas of current research in gynecology and obstetrics. Invited, well-referenced reviews by noted experts keep readers in touch with the general framework and direction of international study. Original papers report selected experimental and clinical investigations in all fields related to gynecology, obstetrics and reproduction. Short communications are published to allow immediate discussion of new data. The international and interdisciplinary character of this periodical provides an avenue to less accessible sources and to worldwide research for investigators and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书