The order of completing MDP and D12 does not affect the breathlessness responses: A randomised controlled trial.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Chronic Respiratory Disease Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-30 DOI:10.1177/14799731251393985
Isabelle Wemar, Jacob Sandberg, Max Olsson, Josefin Sundh, Magnus Ekström
{"title":"The order of completing MDP and D12 does not affect the breathlessness responses: A randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Isabelle Wemar, Jacob Sandberg, Max Olsson, Josefin Sundh, Magnus Ekström","doi":"10.1177/14799731251393985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundBreathlessness is a common and distressing symptom across a wide range of medical conditions. Different aspects (dimensions) of breathlessness can be assessed using the Multidimensional Dyspnoea Profile (MDP) and Dyspnoea-12 (D12) questionnaires. We aimed to examine whether the order of completing MDP and D12 affects the breathlessness responses in people with cardiorespiratory disease.MethodsThis was a randomised controlled trial embedded within a longitudinal clinical study. Outpatients with cardiorespiratory disease were randomly assigned to either first complete the MDP or the D12. Primary outcome was mean difference in D12 total score between groups, secondary outcome was mean difference in D12 and MDP subdomain scores. Both outcomes were compared to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for each scale.ResultsAll 182 participants from the longitudinal study were included. 93 were randomized to complete MDP first and 89 to D12 first. Characteristics such as age, sex, main cause of breathlessness and smoking status were similar between groups. The mean difference for D12 total score (MCID = 2.8) was -1.5 (-4.2 to 1.3, <i>p</i> = 0.26) between groups. Mean differences between groups in subdomain scores were also below the corresponding MCID.ConclusionThe order of completion of MDP and D12 did not impact the scores significantly, but the study lacked power to find smaller yet clinically significant differences. The study supports that the most practical order of completing the instruments can be used in future research and in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"22 ","pages":"14799731251393985"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12576214/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14799731251393985","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundBreathlessness is a common and distressing symptom across a wide range of medical conditions. Different aspects (dimensions) of breathlessness can be assessed using the Multidimensional Dyspnoea Profile (MDP) and Dyspnoea-12 (D12) questionnaires. We aimed to examine whether the order of completing MDP and D12 affects the breathlessness responses in people with cardiorespiratory disease.MethodsThis was a randomised controlled trial embedded within a longitudinal clinical study. Outpatients with cardiorespiratory disease were randomly assigned to either first complete the MDP or the D12. Primary outcome was mean difference in D12 total score between groups, secondary outcome was mean difference in D12 and MDP subdomain scores. Both outcomes were compared to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for each scale.ResultsAll 182 participants from the longitudinal study were included. 93 were randomized to complete MDP first and 89 to D12 first. Characteristics such as age, sex, main cause of breathlessness and smoking status were similar between groups. The mean difference for D12 total score (MCID = 2.8) was -1.5 (-4.2 to 1.3, p = 0.26) between groups. Mean differences between groups in subdomain scores were also below the corresponding MCID.ConclusionThe order of completion of MDP and D12 did not impact the scores significantly, but the study lacked power to find smaller yet clinically significant differences. The study supports that the most practical order of completing the instruments can be used in future research and in clinical settings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

完成MDP和D12的顺序不影响呼吸困难反应:一项随机对照试验。
背景:呼吸困难是一种常见且令人痛苦的症状,存在于各种医疗条件中。呼吸困难的不同方面(维度)可以使用多维呼吸困难概况(MDP)和呼吸困难-12 (D12)问卷进行评估。我们的目的是研究完成MDP和D12的顺序是否影响心肺疾病患者的呼吸反应。方法:这是一项纵向临床研究中的随机对照试验。患有心肺疾病的门诊患者被随机分配首先完成MDP或D12。主要转归为两组间D12总分的平均差异,次要转归为D12和MDP子域评分的平均差异。将两个结果与每个量表的最小临床重要差异(MCID)进行比较。结果182名受试者均纳入本研究。93例首先完成MDP, 89例首先完成D12。年龄、性别、呼吸困难的主要原因和吸烟状况等特征在两组之间相似。D12总分(MCID = 2.8)组间平均差异为-1.5 (-4.2 ~ 1.3,p = 0.26)。各组间子域评分的平均差异也低于相应的MCID。结论MDP和D12的完成顺序对评分无显著影响,但本研究缺乏发现较小但具有临床意义的差异的能力。该研究支持完成仪器的最实用顺序可用于未来的研究和临床设置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chronic Respiratory Disease
Chronic Respiratory Disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Chronic Respiratory Disease is a peer-reviewed, open access, scholarly journal, created in response to the rising incidence of chronic respiratory diseases worldwide. It publishes high quality research papers and original articles that have immediate relevance to clinical practice and its multi-disciplinary perspective reflects the nature of modern treatment. The journal provides a high quality, multi-disciplinary focus for the publication of original papers, reviews and commentary in the broad area of chronic respiratory disease, particularly its treatment and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书