Carolina Ramos, Juan Felipe Gutiérrez, Rafael M Sanabria, Jasmin Vesga, Juan Castellanos De la Hoz, Eduardo Zuniga-Rodriguez, Alejandra Molano-Triviño
{"title":"Toward Green Dialysis: Efficacy and Sustainability with Reduced Dialysate Flow in Expanded Hemodialysis.","authors":"Carolina Ramos, Juan Felipe Gutiérrez, Rafael M Sanabria, Jasmin Vesga, Juan Castellanos De la Hoz, Eduardo Zuniga-Rodriguez, Alejandra Molano-Triviño","doi":"10.1159/000548892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><p>Introduction: Reducing dialysate flow (Qd) to 400 mL/min has proven to be sufficient, safe, and effective in meeting dialysis adequacy requirements in adults, with the added advantage of decreasing water consumption per dialysis session. Expanded hemodialysis (HDx), which uses dialyzers with membranes capable of enhanced clearance of medium-sized molecules due to expanded pore capacity, has higher efficiency and reduces the importance of the dialysate-to-blood flow ratio (Qd/Qb) for molecule removal. The objective of this study was to evaluate dialysis effectiveness by analyzing the reduction rate of medium-sized molecules in patients weighing ≤70 kg, comparing Qd 400 mL/min vs. 500 mL/min in HDx using Theranova® membrane.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A post hoc analysis of the COREXH study population was performed. This observational, analytical, retrospective cohort study included 23 patients, of whom 11 (47%) had Qd 400 mL/min and 12 (52.1%) had Qd 500 mL/min.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences were observed in the reduction rate of medium-sized molecules between the Qd 400 mL/min and 500 mL/min groups. Additionally, water consumption was lower in the Qd 400 mL/min group, with an average saving of 24 L per patient per session and 13,824 L over 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using Qd 400 mL/min in HDx vs. 500 mL/min did not affect dialysis effectiveness in terms of molecule reduction rates and resulted in substantial water savings in Qd 400 mL/min group. </p>.</p>","PeriodicalId":8953,"journal":{"name":"Blood Purification","volume":" ","pages":"148-155"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12707869/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Purification","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548892","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Reducing dialysate flow (Qd) to 400 mL/min has proven to be sufficient, safe, and effective in meeting dialysis adequacy requirements in adults, with the added advantage of decreasing water consumption per dialysis session. Expanded hemodialysis (HDx), which uses dialyzers with membranes capable of enhanced clearance of medium-sized molecules due to expanded pore capacity, has higher efficiency and reduces the importance of the dialysate-to-blood flow ratio (Qd/Qb) for molecule removal. The objective of this study was to evaluate dialysis effectiveness by analyzing the reduction rate of medium-sized molecules in patients weighing ≤70 kg, comparing Qd 400 mL/min vs. 500 mL/min in HDx using Theranova® membrane.
Methods: A post hoc analysis of the COREXH study population was performed. This observational, analytical, retrospective cohort study included 23 patients, of whom 11 (47%) had Qd 400 mL/min and 12 (52.1%) had Qd 500 mL/min.
Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in the reduction rate of medium-sized molecules between the Qd 400 mL/min and 500 mL/min groups. Additionally, water consumption was lower in the Qd 400 mL/min group, with an average saving of 24 L per patient per session and 13,824 L over 12 weeks.
Conclusion: Using Qd 400 mL/min in HDx vs. 500 mL/min did not affect dialysis effectiveness in terms of molecule reduction rates and resulted in substantial water savings in Qd 400 mL/min group.
期刊介绍:
Practical information on hemodialysis, hemofiltration, peritoneal dialysis and apheresis is featured in this journal. Recognizing the critical importance of equipment and procedures, particular emphasis has been placed on reports, drawn from a wide range of fields, describing technical advances and improvements in methodology. Papers reflect the search for cost-effective solutions which increase not only patient survival but also patient comfort and disease improvement through prevention or correction of undesirable effects. Advances in vascular access and blood anticoagulation, problems associated with exposure of blood to foreign surfaces and acute-care nephrology, including continuous therapies, also receive attention. Nephrologists, internists, intensivists and hospital staff involved in dialysis, apheresis and immunoadsorption for acute and chronic solid organ failure will find this journal useful and informative. ''Blood Purification'' also serves as a platform for multidisciplinary experiences involving nephrologists, cardiologists and critical care physicians in order to expand the level of interaction between different disciplines and specialities.