Ruikun Luo;Jiadong Zhao;Qiang He;Feifei Chen;Song Wu;Hai Jin;Yun Yang
{"title":"Popularity-Aware Data Placement in Erasure Coding-Based Edge Storage Systems","authors":"Ruikun Luo;Jiadong Zhao;Qiang He;Feifei Chen;Song Wu;Hai Jin;Yun Yang","doi":"10.1109/TPDS.2025.3619273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Edge computing enables low-latency data access by caching popular content on edge servers. However, server unavailability at runtime can increase retrieval latency when requests are redirected to the cloud. To enhance availability, <i>erasure coding</i> (EC) has been employed to ensure full data access for all users in an edge storage system (ESS). Existing approaches for edge data placement place coded blocks across the entire system without considering data popularity. As a result, they often suffer from high data retrieval latency. In addition, they are designed to process data items individually. Data placed earlier will limit the placement options for subsequent files because edge servers with the most neighbors in the system can be easily exhausted. Some files cannot be placed properly to accommodate user demands. This increases users’ data retrieval latency further. This paper investigates the <i>edge data placement</i> (EDP) problem with popularity awareness. We formulate EDP as a mixed-integer programming problem and prove its <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\mathcal{NP}$</tex-math></inline-formula>-hardness. We then design an exact algorithm (EDP-O) that decomposes the problem into three convex subproblems and solves it iteratively, and an approximation algorithm (EDP-A) with a guaranteed <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\ln N$</tex-math></inline-formula> approximation ratio for large-scale systems. Experiments on real-world datasets show that EDP-O and EDP-A reduce average retrieval latency by 18.4% and 15.6% in small-scale settings, while EDP-A achieves 54.7% latency reduction and 34.9% lower discard rate in large-scale scenarios compared to four baselines.","PeriodicalId":13257,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems","volume":"36 12","pages":"2733-2746"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11197023","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11197023/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Edge computing enables low-latency data access by caching popular content on edge servers. However, server unavailability at runtime can increase retrieval latency when requests are redirected to the cloud. To enhance availability, erasure coding (EC) has been employed to ensure full data access for all users in an edge storage system (ESS). Existing approaches for edge data placement place coded blocks across the entire system without considering data popularity. As a result, they often suffer from high data retrieval latency. In addition, they are designed to process data items individually. Data placed earlier will limit the placement options for subsequent files because edge servers with the most neighbors in the system can be easily exhausted. Some files cannot be placed properly to accommodate user demands. This increases users’ data retrieval latency further. This paper investigates the edge data placement (EDP) problem with popularity awareness. We formulate EDP as a mixed-integer programming problem and prove its $\mathcal{NP}$-hardness. We then design an exact algorithm (EDP-O) that decomposes the problem into three convex subproblems and solves it iteratively, and an approximation algorithm (EDP-A) with a guaranteed $\ln N$ approximation ratio for large-scale systems. Experiments on real-world datasets show that EDP-O and EDP-A reduce average retrieval latency by 18.4% and 15.6% in small-scale settings, while EDP-A achieves 54.7% latency reduction and 34.9% lower discard rate in large-scale scenarios compared to four baselines.
期刊介绍:
IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems (TPDS) is published monthly. It publishes a range of papers, comments on previously published papers, and survey articles that deal with the parallel and distributed systems research areas of current importance to our readers. Particular areas of interest include, but are not limited to:
a) Parallel and distributed algorithms, focusing on topics such as: models of computation; numerical, combinatorial, and data-intensive parallel algorithms, scalability of algorithms and data structures for parallel and distributed systems, communication and synchronization protocols, network algorithms, scheduling, and load balancing.
b) Applications of parallel and distributed computing, including computational and data-enabled science and engineering, big data applications, parallel crowd sourcing, large-scale social network analysis, management of big data, cloud and grid computing, scientific and biomedical applications, mobile computing, and cyber-physical systems.
c) Parallel and distributed architectures, including architectures for instruction-level and thread-level parallelism; design, analysis, implementation, fault resilience and performance measurements of multiple-processor systems; multicore processors, heterogeneous many-core systems; petascale and exascale systems designs; novel big data architectures; special purpose architectures, including graphics processors, signal processors, network processors, media accelerators, and other special purpose processors and accelerators; impact of technology on architecture; network and interconnect architectures; parallel I/O and storage systems; architecture of the memory hierarchy; power-efficient and green computing architectures; dependable architectures; and performance modeling and evaluation.
d) Parallel and distributed software, including parallel and multicore programming languages and compilers, runtime systems, operating systems, Internet computing and web services, resource management including green computing, middleware for grids, clouds, and data centers, libraries, performance modeling and evaluation, parallel programming paradigms, and programming environments and tools.