Understanding the elements of the tourism accessibility chain

IF 5.8 2区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION
Travel Behaviour and Society Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-30 DOI:10.1016/j.tbs.2025.101161
Francisco López-del-Pino , José M. Grisolía , Juan de Dios Ortúzar
{"title":"Understanding the elements of the tourism accessibility chain","authors":"Francisco López-del-Pino ,&nbsp;José M. Grisolía ,&nbsp;Juan de Dios Ortúzar","doi":"10.1016/j.tbs.2025.101161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates how different components of the accessibility chain influence tourist destination choices, using a Hybrid Discrete Choice (HDC) model that integrates stated preferences and latent attitudinal constructs. Drawing on a sample of visitors to Gran Canaria, the results show that staff preparedness, accessible environments, and reliable information significantly affect destination choice, with staff training emerging as the most influential factor. The research is grounded in the Social Model of Disability, which views disability as a social construct, and the Capability Approach, which focuses on individuals’ freedom to live the lives they value. These frameworks reframe accessibility not as an isolated technical issue but as a systemic condition enabling or constraining effective participation. The study also adopts a Universal and Inclusive Design perspective within this framework, recognising human diversity as a central design parameter in tourism systems. The estimated model reveals substantial heterogeneity in preferences: individuals with direct or indirect experience of disability place greater importance on staff support and trustworthy information. At the same time, younger and non-disabled tourists prioritise price and location. By combining behavioural and attitudinal data, the study demonstrates the added value of HDC models for understanding how accessibility is cognitively evaluated and behaviourally enacted. The findings have practical implications for inclusive destination design. Rather than addressing accessibility through isolated improvements, tourism systems should adopt a chain-based approach, ensuring coherence across all stages of the travel experience. As societies age and accessibility becomes a strategic imperative, this model provides a transferable tool for evaluating service gaps and guiding inclusive policy design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51534,"journal":{"name":"Travel Behaviour and Society","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 101161"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Behaviour and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X25001796","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates how different components of the accessibility chain influence tourist destination choices, using a Hybrid Discrete Choice (HDC) model that integrates stated preferences and latent attitudinal constructs. Drawing on a sample of visitors to Gran Canaria, the results show that staff preparedness, accessible environments, and reliable information significantly affect destination choice, with staff training emerging as the most influential factor. The research is grounded in the Social Model of Disability, which views disability as a social construct, and the Capability Approach, which focuses on individuals’ freedom to live the lives they value. These frameworks reframe accessibility not as an isolated technical issue but as a systemic condition enabling or constraining effective participation. The study also adopts a Universal and Inclusive Design perspective within this framework, recognising human diversity as a central design parameter in tourism systems. The estimated model reveals substantial heterogeneity in preferences: individuals with direct or indirect experience of disability place greater importance on staff support and trustworthy information. At the same time, younger and non-disabled tourists prioritise price and location. By combining behavioural and attitudinal data, the study demonstrates the added value of HDC models for understanding how accessibility is cognitively evaluated and behaviourally enacted. The findings have practical implications for inclusive destination design. Rather than addressing accessibility through isolated improvements, tourism systems should adopt a chain-based approach, ensuring coherence across all stages of the travel experience. As societies age and accessibility becomes a strategic imperative, this model provides a transferable tool for evaluating service gaps and guiding inclusive policy design.
了解旅游无障碍链的要素
本研究使用混合离散选择(HDC)模型,结合陈述偏好和潜在态度构念,探讨可达性链的不同组成部分对旅游目的地选择的影响。通过对大加那利岛游客的抽样调查,结果表明,工作人员的准备、无障碍的环境和可靠的信息显著影响目的地的选择,其中工作人员培训成为最具影响力的因素。该研究基于残疾的社会模型和能力方法,前者将残疾视为一种社会建构,后者关注个人过自己所珍视的生活的自由。这些框架不再将无障碍视为孤立的技术问题,而是将其视为能够或限制有效参与的系统条件。该研究还在这一框架内采用了通用和包容性设计的视角,将人类多样性视为旅游系统的核心设计参数。估计的模型揭示了偏好的实质性异质性:有直接或间接残疾经历的个人更重视工作人员的支持和可靠的信息。与此同时,年轻和非残疾游客优先考虑价格和位置。通过结合行为和态度数据,该研究证明了HDC模型在理解可访问性如何进行认知评估和行为制定方面的附加价值。研究结果对包容性目的地设计具有实际意义。旅游系统不应通过孤立的改进来解决可达性问题,而应采用基于链条的方法,确保旅游体验各个阶段的一致性。随着社会老龄化和无障碍成为战略要求,该模型为评估服务差距和指导包容性政策设计提供了可转移的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Travel Behaviour and Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high-quality original papers which report leading edge research in theories, methodologies and applications concerning transportation issues and challenges which involve the social and spatial dimensions. In particular, it provides a discussion forum for major research in travel behaviour, transportation infrastructure, transportation and environmental issues, mobility and social sustainability, transportation geographic information systems (TGIS), transportation and quality of life, transportation data collection and analysis, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书