Model Predictive Control on the Neural Manifold

IF 2.1 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Christof Fehrman;C. Daniel Meliza
{"title":"Model Predictive Control on the Neural Manifold","authors":"Christof Fehrman;C. Daniel Meliza","doi":"10.1162/neco.a.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neural manifolds are an attractive theoretical framework for characterizing the complex behaviors of neural populations. However, many of the tools for identifying these low-dimensional subspaces are correlational and provide limited insight into the underlying dynamics. The ability to precisely control the latent activity of a circuit would allow researchers to investigate the structure and function of neural manifolds. We simulate controlling the latent dynamics of a neural population using closed-loop, dynamically generated sensory inputs. Using a spiking neural network (SNN) as a model of a neural circuit, we find low-dimensional representations of both the network activity (the neural manifold) and a set of salient visual stimuli. The fields of classical and optimal control offer a range of methods to choose from for controlling dynamics on the neural manifold, which differ in performance, computational cost, and ease of implementation. Here, we focus on two commonly used control methods: proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control and model predictive control (MPC). PID is a computationally lightweight controller that is simple to implement. In contrast, MPC is a model-based, anticipatory controller with a much higher computational cost and engineering overhead. We evaluate both methods on trajectory-following tasks in latent space, under partial observability and in the presence of unknown noise. While both controllers in some cases were able to successfully control the latent dynamics on the neural manifold, MPC consistently produced more accurate control and required less hyperparameter tuning. These results demonstrate how MPC can be applied on the neural manifold using data-driven dynamics models and provide a framework to experimentally test for causal relationships between manifold dynamics and external stimuli.","PeriodicalId":54731,"journal":{"name":"Neural Computation","volume":"37 12","pages":"2125-2157"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neural Computation","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11268935/","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neural manifolds are an attractive theoretical framework for characterizing the complex behaviors of neural populations. However, many of the tools for identifying these low-dimensional subspaces are correlational and provide limited insight into the underlying dynamics. The ability to precisely control the latent activity of a circuit would allow researchers to investigate the structure and function of neural manifolds. We simulate controlling the latent dynamics of a neural population using closed-loop, dynamically generated sensory inputs. Using a spiking neural network (SNN) as a model of a neural circuit, we find low-dimensional representations of both the network activity (the neural manifold) and a set of salient visual stimuli. The fields of classical and optimal control offer a range of methods to choose from for controlling dynamics on the neural manifold, which differ in performance, computational cost, and ease of implementation. Here, we focus on two commonly used control methods: proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control and model predictive control (MPC). PID is a computationally lightweight controller that is simple to implement. In contrast, MPC is a model-based, anticipatory controller with a much higher computational cost and engineering overhead. We evaluate both methods on trajectory-following tasks in latent space, under partial observability and in the presence of unknown noise. While both controllers in some cases were able to successfully control the latent dynamics on the neural manifold, MPC consistently produced more accurate control and required less hyperparameter tuning. These results demonstrate how MPC can be applied on the neural manifold using data-driven dynamics models and provide a framework to experimentally test for causal relationships between manifold dynamics and external stimuli.
神经流形的模型预测控制。
神经流形是描述神经群体复杂行为的一个有吸引力的理论框架。然而,许多用于识别这些低维子空间的工具是相互关联的,并且对底层动态的了解有限。精确控制回路潜在活动的能力将使研究人员能够研究神经流形的结构和功能。我们模拟控制潜在的动态神经群体使用闭环,动态产生的感官输入。使用尖峰神经网络(SNN)作为神经回路的模型,我们发现了网络活动(神经流形)和一组显著视觉刺激的低维表示。经典控制和最优控制领域为神经流形上的动态控制提供了一系列方法可供选择,这些方法在性能、计算成本和易于实现方面存在差异。本文重点介绍了两种常用的控制方法:比例-积分-导数(PID)控制和模型预测控制(MPC)。PID是一种计算量很轻的控制器,易于实现。相比之下,MPC是一种基于模型的预期控制器,具有更高的计算成本和工程开销。我们在潜在空间、部分可观察性和存在未知噪声的情况下评估了这两种方法的轨迹跟踪任务。虽然在某些情况下,两个控制器都能够成功地控制神经流形上的潜在动力学,但MPC始终能够产生更精确的控制,并且需要更少的超参数调谐。这些结果表明MPC可以通过数据驱动的动力学模型应用于神经流形,并为实验测试流形动力学与外部刺激之间的因果关系提供了一个框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neural Computation
Neural Computation 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
83
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Neural Computation is uniquely positioned at the crossroads between neuroscience and TMCS and welcomes the submission of original papers from all areas of TMCS, including: Advanced experimental design; Analysis of chemical sensor data; Connectomic reconstructions; Analysis of multielectrode and optical recordings; Genetic data for cell identity; Analysis of behavioral data; Multiscale models; Analysis of molecular mechanisms; Neuroinformatics; Analysis of brain imaging data; Neuromorphic engineering; Principles of neural coding, computation, circuit dynamics, and plasticity; Theories of brain function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书