Association of over-the-counter birth control pill use and contraceptive autonomy among oral contraceptive users

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Contraception Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-27 DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111253
Kimberly M. Schaefer , Haley Burns , Jonas J. Swartz , Alison B. Edelman , Maria I. Rodriguez
{"title":"Association of over-the-counter birth control pill use and contraceptive autonomy among oral contraceptive users","authors":"Kimberly M. Schaefer ,&nbsp;Haley Burns ,&nbsp;Jonas J. Swartz ,&nbsp;Alison B. Edelman ,&nbsp;Maria I. Rodriguez","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the association between individuals’ experiences with healthcare and over-the-counter (OTC) pill use.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>We conducted a cross-sectional online baseline survey of individuals aged 15–45 obtaining oral contraception (OTC or by prescription) for pregnancy prevention in a convenience sample across the United States (US). We collected demographic information, clinical information, and measured contraceptive autonomy using three validated measures: Contraceptive Agency Scale (CAS), the Person-Centered Contraceptive Care (PCCC) measure, and the Discrimination in Medical Settings (DMS) survey. We compared these characteristics between people using prescription and OTC pills and built logistic regression models to evaluate the association between OTC pill use and each of these three measures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our sample included 497 individuals (OTC 22.5%, <em>n</em> = 112; prescription 77.5%, <em>n</em> = 385) who received contraceptive counseling within the past year. Compared to participants with a prescription, users of OTC pills were older, more commonly uninsured (18.8% vs. 2.9%, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), on Medicaid (24.1% vs. 10.1%, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and more likely to be Black (18.8% vs. 5.7%, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Less than half of OTC pill users were already using a more effective method of contraception prior to survey completion, compared to the majority of prescription users (47.3% vs. 82.9%, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Based on adjusted multivariable models, key autonomy outcomes of low contraceptive agency and non person-contraceptive care were both associated with increased probability of OTC pill use.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The OTC pill may fill an important gap in improving contraception access, particularly among individuals with past negative healthcare interactions.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>Our study suggests that individuals reporting lower contraceptive agency and less person-centered care are more likely to use over-the-counter than prescription oral contraception. Expanding over-the-counter access may reduce barriers for marginalized populations with poor healthcare interactions, supporting more equitable contraceptive access across diverse demographic and insurance groups in the U.S.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":"155 ","pages":"Article 111253"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782425004445","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the association between individuals’ experiences with healthcare and over-the-counter (OTC) pill use.

Study design

We conducted a cross-sectional online baseline survey of individuals aged 15–45 obtaining oral contraception (OTC or by prescription) for pregnancy prevention in a convenience sample across the United States (US). We collected demographic information, clinical information, and measured contraceptive autonomy using three validated measures: Contraceptive Agency Scale (CAS), the Person-Centered Contraceptive Care (PCCC) measure, and the Discrimination in Medical Settings (DMS) survey. We compared these characteristics between people using prescription and OTC pills and built logistic regression models to evaluate the association between OTC pill use and each of these three measures.

Results

Our sample included 497 individuals (OTC 22.5%, n = 112; prescription 77.5%, n = 385) who received contraceptive counseling within the past year. Compared to participants with a prescription, users of OTC pills were older, more commonly uninsured (18.8% vs. 2.9%, p < 0.001), on Medicaid (24.1% vs. 10.1%, p < 0.001), and more likely to be Black (18.8% vs. 5.7%, p < 0.001). Less than half of OTC pill users were already using a more effective method of contraception prior to survey completion, compared to the majority of prescription users (47.3% vs. 82.9%, p < 0.001). Based on adjusted multivariable models, key autonomy outcomes of low contraceptive agency and non person-contraceptive care were both associated with increased probability of OTC pill use.

Conclusion

The OTC pill may fill an important gap in improving contraception access, particularly among individuals with past negative healthcare interactions.

Implications

Our study suggests that individuals reporting lower contraceptive agency and less person-centered care are more likely to use over-the-counter than prescription oral contraception. Expanding over-the-counter access may reduce barriers for marginalized populations with poor healthcare interactions, supporting more equitable contraceptive access across diverse demographic and insurance groups in the U.S.
口服避孕药使用者非处方避孕药使用与避孕自主的关系。
目的:评价个人医疗保健经历与非处方药(OTC)使用之间的关系。研究设计:我们进行了一项横断面在线基线调查,调查对象为年龄在15-45岁之间的个体,这些个体为了预防怀孕而在全美范围内获得口服避孕药(OTC或处方)。我们收集了人口统计信息、临床信息,并使用三种有效的测量方法来测量避孕自主性:避孕机构量表(CAS)、以人为中心的避孕护理(PCCC)测量和医疗环境中的歧视(DMS)调查。我们比较了使用处方药和非处方药的人群的这些特征,并建立了logistic回归模型来评估非处方药使用与这三个指标之间的关系。结果:我们的样本包括497名在过去一年内接受避孕咨询的患者(非处方22.5%,n = 112;处方77.5%,n = 385)。与有处方的参与者相比,OTC避孕药的使用者年龄较大,更常见的是没有保险(18.8%比2.9%)。结论:OTC避孕药可能填补了改善避孕可及性的重要空白,特别是在过去有负面医疗互动的个体中。含义:我们的研究表明,报告较低的避孕机构和较少以人为本的护理的个人更有可能使用非处方药而不是处方口服避孕药。扩大非处方药的使用范围可能会减少医疗保健互动不良的边缘化人群的障碍,支持在美国不同的人口和保险群体中更公平地获得避孕药具
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contraception
Contraception 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
211
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书