Mechanical instability of the lumbar spine following intervertebral disc injury: a comparison of two injury methods.

Q2 Medicine
International Biomechanics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-30 DOI:10.1080/23335432.2025.2581469
Fangxin Xiao, Wendy Noort, Juliette Lévénez, Jia Han, Jaap H van Dieën, Huub Maas
{"title":"Mechanical instability of the lumbar spine following intervertebral disc injury: a comparison of two injury methods.","authors":"Fangxin Xiao, Wendy Noort, Juliette Lévénez, Jia Han, Jaap H van Dieën, Huub Maas","doi":"10.1080/23335432.2025.2581469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration is a potential contributor to low-back pain. While experimental IVD injury models have demonstrated IVD structural changes, the early mechanical consequences remain unclear. This study aims to assess and compare the effects of two IVD injury models on lumbar spine instability and assess back musculature adaptations to IVD injury. Thirty-one adult male Wistar rats were assigned to three groups: IVD knife stab lesion (knife), IVD needle puncture (needle), and sham surgery control (control). In the knife and needle groups, L4/L5 IVDs were injured at 14 weeks of age. One to two weeks post-intervention, lumbar multifidus (MF) and medial longissimus (ML) muscles were excised, L4-L5 spinal segments were harvested for mechanical testing, and IVDs were collected for histology. The needle group exhibited lower peak stiffness, peak moment and hysteresis than controls in flexion, with no difference in lateral bending. IVD height and area did not differ between groups, but the needle group had a smaller nucleus relative to the annulus area compared to controls. Morphological changes were observed in both injury groups. The needle group showed a higher normalized ML mass, while the normalized MF mass was unchanged. In conclusion, lumbar spine instability was successfully established via IVD needle injury in the rat.</p>","PeriodicalId":52124,"journal":{"name":"International Biomechanics","volume":"12 1","pages":"67-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12576908/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2025.2581469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration is a potential contributor to low-back pain. While experimental IVD injury models have demonstrated IVD structural changes, the early mechanical consequences remain unclear. This study aims to assess and compare the effects of two IVD injury models on lumbar spine instability and assess back musculature adaptations to IVD injury. Thirty-one adult male Wistar rats were assigned to three groups: IVD knife stab lesion (knife), IVD needle puncture (needle), and sham surgery control (control). In the knife and needle groups, L4/L5 IVDs were injured at 14 weeks of age. One to two weeks post-intervention, lumbar multifidus (MF) and medial longissimus (ML) muscles were excised, L4-L5 spinal segments were harvested for mechanical testing, and IVDs were collected for histology. The needle group exhibited lower peak stiffness, peak moment and hysteresis than controls in flexion, with no difference in lateral bending. IVD height and area did not differ between groups, but the needle group had a smaller nucleus relative to the annulus area compared to controls. Morphological changes were observed in both injury groups. The needle group showed a higher normalized ML mass, while the normalized MF mass was unchanged. In conclusion, lumbar spine instability was successfully established via IVD needle injury in the rat.

椎间盘损伤后腰椎的机械不稳定:两种损伤方法的比较。
椎间盘(IVD)退变是腰痛的潜在诱因。虽然实验性IVD损伤模型已经证明了IVD的结构变化,但早期的机械后果尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估和比较两种IVD损伤模型对腰椎不稳定性的影响,并评估背部肌肉组织对IVD损伤的适应性。将31只成年雄性Wistar大鼠分为IVD刀刺病变组(knife)、IVD针穿刺组(needle)和假手术对照组(control) 3组。在刀针组,L4/L5 ivd在14周龄时损伤。干预后1 ~ 2周,切除腰椎多裂肌(MF)和内侧最长肌(ML),收获L4-L5脊柱节段进行力学试验,并收集ivd进行组织学检查。针刺组在屈曲时表现出较低的峰值刚度、峰值力矩和迟滞,而在侧向弯曲方面没有差异。各组间IVD的高度和面积没有差异,但针组的核相对于环的面积比对照组小。两组损伤均有形态学改变。针刺组ML归一化质量较高,MF归一化质量不变。综上所述,IVD针伤成功建立了大鼠腰椎不稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Biomechanics
International Biomechanics Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: International Biomechanics is a fully Open Access biomechanics journal that aims to foster innovation, debate and collaboration across the full spectrum of biomechanics. We publish original articles, reviews, and short communications in all areas of biomechanics and welcome papers that explore: Bio-fluid mechanics, Continuum Biomechanics, Biotribology, Cellular Biomechanics, Mechanobiology, Mechano-transduction, Tissue Mechanics, Comparative Biomechanics and Functional Anatomy, Allometry, Animal locomotion in biomechanics, Gait analysis in biomechanics, Musculoskeletal and Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Cardiovascular Biomechanics, Plant Biomechanics, Injury Biomechanics, Impact Biomechanics, Sport and Exercise Biomechanics, Kinesiology, Rehabilitation in biomechanics, Quantitative Ergonomics, Human Factors engineering, Occupational Biomechanics, Developmental Biomechanics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书