Antibiotic use in poultry farming: a cross-sectional study of veterinary practices in Tunisia.

IF 3.9
Frontiers in antibiotics Pub Date : 2025-10-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frabi.2025.1646766
Mehdi Ben Ali, Badi Chtioui, Hamza Bouchrit, Hatem Laamiri, Hedia Attia El Hili
{"title":"Antibiotic use in poultry farming: a cross-sectional study of veterinary practices in Tunisia.","authors":"Mehdi Ben Ali, Badi Chtioui, Hamza Bouchrit, Hatem Laamiri, Hedia Attia El Hili","doi":"10.3389/frabi.2025.1646766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in poultry production poses a growing public health threat due to the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria and the risk of transmission to humans through direct or indirect contact with these germs. In Tunisia, limited data on antibiotic use and veterinary prescribing practices hinder the development of effective AMR mitigation strategies, particularly in a sector with high antibiotic consumption. A cross-sectional study was conducted among veterinarian prescribers in avian medicine in Tunisia to assess their antibiotic prescribing behaviours and related practices and to evaluate their potential contribution to AMR emergence and spread. The most frequently reported first and second-line antibiotics were enrofloxacin (20/52 and 14/52), florfenicol (14/52 and 14/52), and doxycycline (7/52 and 6/52). Colistin (10/52) was the most used third-line antibiotic. These antibiotics were often administered without microbiological confirmation. Although 69% had access to accredited labs, 42% relied on rapid antimicrobial susceptibility tests (RASTs). Waste management practices were inadequate, with 50% disposing of biological waste in regular trash and 42% discarding expired antibiotics into the environment. Additionally, 77% reported frequent farmer self-medication. These findings highlight the urgent need for targeted training, improved surveillance, and the application of the One Health approach to tackle AMR in Tunisia's poultry sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":73065,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in antibiotics","volume":"4 ","pages":"1646766"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12558877/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in antibiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frabi.2025.1646766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in poultry production poses a growing public health threat due to the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria and the risk of transmission to humans through direct or indirect contact with these germs. In Tunisia, limited data on antibiotic use and veterinary prescribing practices hinder the development of effective AMR mitigation strategies, particularly in a sector with high antibiotic consumption. A cross-sectional study was conducted among veterinarian prescribers in avian medicine in Tunisia to assess their antibiotic prescribing behaviours and related practices and to evaluate their potential contribution to AMR emergence and spread. The most frequently reported first and second-line antibiotics were enrofloxacin (20/52 and 14/52), florfenicol (14/52 and 14/52), and doxycycline (7/52 and 6/52). Colistin (10/52) was the most used third-line antibiotic. These antibiotics were often administered without microbiological confirmation. Although 69% had access to accredited labs, 42% relied on rapid antimicrobial susceptibility tests (RASTs). Waste management practices were inadequate, with 50% disposing of biological waste in regular trash and 42% discarding expired antibiotics into the environment. Additionally, 77% reported frequent farmer self-medication. These findings highlight the urgent need for targeted training, improved surveillance, and the application of the One Health approach to tackle AMR in Tunisia's poultry sector.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

家禽养殖中的抗生素使用:突尼斯兽医实践的横断面研究。
由于多药耐药细菌的出现以及通过直接或间接接触这些细菌传播给人类的风险,家禽生产中的抗微生物药物耐药性(AMR)构成了日益严重的公共卫生威胁。在突尼斯,关于抗生素使用和兽医处方做法的数据有限,阻碍了制定有效的抗生素耐药性缓解战略,特别是在抗生素消费量高的部门。在突尼斯禽类医学兽医开处方者中开展了一项横断面研究,以评估其抗生素处方行为和相关做法,并评估其对抗生素耐药性出现和传播的潜在影响。报告最多的一线和二线抗生素是恩诺沙星(20/52和14/52)、氟苯尼考(14/52和14/52)和强力霉素(7/52和6/52)。粘菌素(10/52)是使用最多的三线抗生素。这些抗生素通常在没有微生物学证实的情况下使用。虽然69%的人可以获得认可的实验室,但42%的人依赖快速抗菌药物敏感性试验(RASTs)。废物管理做法不充分,50%的生物废物在常规垃圾中处理,42%的人将过期的抗生素丢弃到环境中。此外,77%的人报告说农民经常自我用药。这些发现突出表明迫切需要进行有针对性的培训、改进监测和应用“同一个健康”方法来解决突尼斯家禽业的抗生素耐药性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书