{"title":"Micro-Sim: Advancing antimicrobial Stewardship education through interprofessional simulation.","authors":"Miguel Vella, Li Ling Choo, Iram Lodhi","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2025.2579098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>What was the educational challenge?</b> Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing remains a persistent problem, with significant knowledge gaps among students and physicians. We evaluated 180 antibiotic prescriptions showing 68% were inconsistent with trust guidelines, highlighting the need for targeted interventions. <b>What was the solution and how was it implemented?</b> Participants undertook a week-long program comprising interactive presentations, charts, newsletters, and the Micro-Sim simulation. Acting as infection doctors, they managed bleeps and advised on ten structured cases including assessing a septic mannikin. Pre- and postintervention questionnaires assessed knowledge, supplemented by qualitative feedback. <b>What lessons were learned and what are the next steps?</b> Across 10 sessions (<i>n</i> = 105), questionnaire scores improved by 42% (<i>p</i> < 0.0005, Cronbach <i>a</i> > 0.8), and self-reported knowledge increased by 74% (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Participants reported greater confidencein safe prescribing, with audit data showing improved adherence to antimicrobial policies. Micro-Sim proved adaptable across doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and students with potential for scalable, clinically meaningful impact worldwide. We now plan to train regional facilitators and develop a virtual version of Micro-Sim to enable international dissemination.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":" ","pages":"1641-1644"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2025.2579098","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
What was the educational challenge? Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing remains a persistent problem, with significant knowledge gaps among students and physicians. We evaluated 180 antibiotic prescriptions showing 68% were inconsistent with trust guidelines, highlighting the need for targeted interventions. What was the solution and how was it implemented? Participants undertook a week-long program comprising interactive presentations, charts, newsletters, and the Micro-Sim simulation. Acting as infection doctors, they managed bleeps and advised on ten structured cases including assessing a septic mannikin. Pre- and postintervention questionnaires assessed knowledge, supplemented by qualitative feedback. What lessons were learned and what are the next steps? Across 10 sessions (n = 105), questionnaire scores improved by 42% (p < 0.0005, Cronbach a > 0.8), and self-reported knowledge increased by 74% (p < 0.0001). Participants reported greater confidencein safe prescribing, with audit data showing improved adherence to antimicrobial policies. Micro-Sim proved adaptable across doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and students with potential for scalable, clinically meaningful impact worldwide. We now plan to train regional facilitators and develop a virtual version of Micro-Sim to enable international dissemination.
教育方面的挑战是什么?不适当的抗生素处方仍然是一个持续存在的问题,学生和医生之间的知识差距很大。我们评估了180种抗生素处方,显示68%与信任指南不一致,强调了有针对性干预的必要性。解决方案是如何实现的?参与者进行了为期一周的活动,包括互动演示、图表、通讯和Micro-Sim模拟。作为感染医生,他们管理哔哔声,并为十个结构化病例提供建议,包括评估一个败血症的人体模型。干预前和干预后的问卷评估知识,辅以定性反馈。吸取了哪些与更广泛的全球受众相关的教训?在10个疗程(n = 105)中,问卷得分提高了42% (p 0.8),自我报告的知识增加了74% (p What are next steps?:我们计划培训区域协调员,并开发微型sim卡的虚拟版本,以便在国际上传播。
期刊介绍:
Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.