Carbon dioxide plumes, pressure space and legacy well risk for Southern North Sea CO2 storage projects

IF 4.7
Energy Geoscience Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-15 DOI:10.1016/j.engeos.2025.100475
Alexandra Smith , Gary Hampson , Iman Rahimzadeh Kivi , Sam Krevor
{"title":"Carbon dioxide plumes, pressure space and legacy well risk for Southern North Sea CO2 storage projects","authors":"Alexandra Smith ,&nbsp;Gary Hampson ,&nbsp;Iman Rahimzadeh Kivi ,&nbsp;Sam Krevor","doi":"10.1016/j.engeos.2025.100475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Unsecured legacy wells pose significant risks to carbon capture and storage (CCS) as they present potential leakage pathways for stored CO<sub>2</sub> to return to the atmosphere. In the UK, legacy wells must be assessed for a carbon storage permit to be granted and high-risk wells require costly remediation. We use a well risk assessment scheme to evaluate the risk of wells in the Southern North Sea. We then combine our well risk assessment with investigation using the analytical tool CO2BLOCK, which relies on a gravity current model to estimate pressure and plume migration distances. We evaluate the Viking, Camelot and Poseidon projects, which plan to inject CO<sub>2</sub> into the depleted reservoirs of Southern North Sea gas fields. Carbon dioxide plumes are typically several kilometers wide, and it should be possible to avoid plume migration to high-risk legacy wells. In contrast, pressure fields produced by CO<sub>2</sub> injection are tens of kilometers wide and low magnitude pressure increases frequently extend beyond the bounds of storage licence areas. The pressure fields encounter hundreds of wells and in the cases of the Camelot and Poseidon projects, interact with each other.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100469,"journal":{"name":"Energy Geoscience","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 100475"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Geoscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666759225000964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unsecured legacy wells pose significant risks to carbon capture and storage (CCS) as they present potential leakage pathways for stored CO2 to return to the atmosphere. In the UK, legacy wells must be assessed for a carbon storage permit to be granted and high-risk wells require costly remediation. We use a well risk assessment scheme to evaluate the risk of wells in the Southern North Sea. We then combine our well risk assessment with investigation using the analytical tool CO2BLOCK, which relies on a gravity current model to estimate pressure and plume migration distances. We evaluate the Viking, Camelot and Poseidon projects, which plan to inject CO2 into the depleted reservoirs of Southern North Sea gas fields. Carbon dioxide plumes are typically several kilometers wide, and it should be possible to avoid plume migration to high-risk legacy wells. In contrast, pressure fields produced by CO2 injection are tens of kilometers wide and low magnitude pressure increases frequently extend beyond the bounds of storage licence areas. The pressure fields encounter hundreds of wells and in the cases of the Camelot and Poseidon projects, interact with each other.

Abstract Image

南北海二氧化碳封存项目的二氧化碳羽流、压力空间和遗留井风险
不安全的老井给碳捕获与封存(CCS)带来了重大风险,因为它们为储存的二氧化碳返回大气提供了潜在的泄漏途径。在英国,遗留井必须经过评估才能获得碳储存许可,高风险井需要昂贵的修复费用。采用井风险评价方案对北海南部油井进行风险评价。然后,我们使用分析工具CO2BLOCK将油井风险评估与调查结合起来,该工具依赖于重力流模型来估计压力和羽流迁移距离。我们评估了Viking、Camelot和Poseidon项目,这些项目计划向北海南部气田枯竭的储层注入二氧化碳。二氧化碳羽流通常有几公里宽,应该可以避免羽流迁移到高风险的遗留井。相比之下,二氧化碳注入产生的压力场宽度为数十公里,低幅度的压力增加经常超出存储许可区域的范围。压力场涉及数百口井,在Camelot和Poseidon项目中,压力场相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书