Marjan De Coster, Silke Op de Beeck, Marijke Verbruggen, Rein De Cooman
{"title":"Tangled in tech: A systems psychodynamic analysis of work-related ICT use outside standard work hours within dual-earner couples","authors":"Marjan De Coster, Silke Op de Beeck, Marijke Verbruggen, Rein De Cooman","doi":"10.1177/00187267251379725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Why do so many workers continue to work after hours using information and communication technology (ICT), even though this behavior induces tensions between them and their partner? To understand this paradoxical phenomenon, we conducted in-depth interviews with both partners of 22 dual-earner couples (i.e., 44 interviews), which we analyzed from a systems psychodynamic perspective. Our analysis revealed what we defined as the “Narrative of unavoidability,” a shared discourse among all couples that constructs work-related ICT-use outside work hours (WICT) as unavoidable for the job. Simply put, workers and their partners argued that WICT is just necessary to perform their jobs effectively. This narrative justified the WICT behaviors, despite tensions and evidence that WICT was actually not always unavoidable. Informed by this narrative, both partners projected responsibility for WICT from the partner engaging in this behavior onto external (f)actors as a way to manage and alleviate the tensions triggered by WICT. This psychological defense further delineated particular practices by which partners tiptoed around the seemingly unavoidable WICT. Although these defense practices helped partners to temporarily ease the WICT tensions, they simultaneously normalized WICT and reproduced the narrative of unavoidability within couples. Consequently, the tensions kept resurfacing.","PeriodicalId":48433,"journal":{"name":"Human Relations","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267251379725","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Why do so many workers continue to work after hours using information and communication technology (ICT), even though this behavior induces tensions between them and their partner? To understand this paradoxical phenomenon, we conducted in-depth interviews with both partners of 22 dual-earner couples (i.e., 44 interviews), which we analyzed from a systems psychodynamic perspective. Our analysis revealed what we defined as the “Narrative of unavoidability,” a shared discourse among all couples that constructs work-related ICT-use outside work hours (WICT) as unavoidable for the job. Simply put, workers and their partners argued that WICT is just necessary to perform their jobs effectively. This narrative justified the WICT behaviors, despite tensions and evidence that WICT was actually not always unavoidable. Informed by this narrative, both partners projected responsibility for WICT from the partner engaging in this behavior onto external (f)actors as a way to manage and alleviate the tensions triggered by WICT. This psychological defense further delineated particular practices by which partners tiptoed around the seemingly unavoidable WICT. Although these defense practices helped partners to temporarily ease the WICT tensions, they simultaneously normalized WICT and reproduced the narrative of unavoidability within couples. Consequently, the tensions kept resurfacing.
期刊介绍:
Human Relations is an international peer reviewed journal, which publishes the highest quality original research to advance our understanding of social relationships at and around work through theoretical development and empirical investigation. Scope Human Relations seeks high quality research papers that extend our knowledge of social relationships at work and organizational forms, practices and processes that affect the nature, structure and conditions of work and work organizations. Human Relations welcomes manuscripts that seek to cross disciplinary boundaries in order to develop new perspectives and insights into social relationships and relationships between people and organizations. Human Relations encourages strong empirical contributions that develop and extend theory as well as more conceptual papers that integrate, critique and expand existing theory. Human Relations welcomes critical reviews and essays: - Critical reviews advance a field through new theory, new methods, a novel synthesis of extant evidence, or a combination of two or three of these elements. Reviews that identify new research questions and that make links between management and organizations and the wider social sciences are particularly welcome. Surveys or overviews of a field are unlikely to meet these criteria. - Critical essays address contemporary scholarly issues and debates within the journal''s scope. They are more controversial than conventional papers or reviews, and can be shorter. They argue a point of view, but must meet standards of academic rigour. Anyone with an idea for a critical essay is particularly encouraged to discuss it at an early stage with the Editor-in-Chief. Human Relations encourages research that relates social theory to social practice and translates knowledge about human relations into prospects for social action and policy-making that aims to improve working lives.