Take Action Now! A Longitudinal Study of Political Party Calls to Action Across Social Media Platforms

IF 4.3 2区 社会学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Anders Olof Larsson
{"title":"Take Action Now! A Longitudinal Study of Political Party Calls to Action Across Social Media Platforms","authors":"Anders Olof Larsson","doi":"10.1177/08944393251390890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online political campaigning takes place on several platforms, suggesting the need for those seeking voter support—such as political parties—to adapt to the characteristics of each platform. Getting voters to take action—be it online (such as asking them to engage with posts) or offline (such as asking them to attend rallies or to vote)—is a key element of campaigning efforts. Here, we focus on the use of what is referred to as calls to action as employed by Norwegian political parties on three different social media platforms (Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter) between 2013 and 2024. Using a combination of automated and manual content analysis, the results indicate that while Facebook is the preferred platform for providing calls to action during roughly the first half of our time period, Instagram takes the lead in this regard for the latter half. Overall, though, we see a clear decrease of calls to action across all three platforms, indicating the changing priorities of parties. Using likes as a common measurement of engagement across all three studied platforms, posts containing calls to action emerged as less popular towards the end of the time period for Facebook and Twitter, while users of Instagram appear to be more interested in engaging with such posts also during these latter stages. The study ends with a discussion of the main findings, also suggesting some ways forward for future research efforts.","PeriodicalId":49509,"journal":{"name":"Social Science Computer Review","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science Computer Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393251390890","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online political campaigning takes place on several platforms, suggesting the need for those seeking voter support—such as political parties—to adapt to the characteristics of each platform. Getting voters to take action—be it online (such as asking them to engage with posts) or offline (such as asking them to attend rallies or to vote)—is a key element of campaigning efforts. Here, we focus on the use of what is referred to as calls to action as employed by Norwegian political parties on three different social media platforms (Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter) between 2013 and 2024. Using a combination of automated and manual content analysis, the results indicate that while Facebook is the preferred platform for providing calls to action during roughly the first half of our time period, Instagram takes the lead in this regard for the latter half. Overall, though, we see a clear decrease of calls to action across all three platforms, indicating the changing priorities of parties. Using likes as a common measurement of engagement across all three studied platforms, posts containing calls to action emerged as less popular towards the end of the time period for Facebook and Twitter, while users of Instagram appear to be more interested in engaging with such posts also during these latter stages. The study ends with a discussion of the main findings, also suggesting some ways forward for future research efforts.
现在就采取行动!政党在社交媒体平台上号召行动的纵向研究
在线政治竞选活动在几个平台上进行,这表明那些寻求选民支持的人——比如政党——需要适应每个平台的特点。让选民采取行动——无论是在网上(如要求他们参与帖子)还是在线下(如要求他们参加集会或投票)——是竞选活动的关键要素。在这里,我们关注的是2013年至2024年间,挪威政党在三个不同的社交媒体平台(Facebook、Instagram和Twitter)上使用的所谓“行动呼吁”。使用自动和手动内容分析的结合,结果表明,虽然Facebook在我们的时间段的前半段是提供行动呼吁的首选平台,但Instagram在后半段在这方面处于领先地位。但总体而言,我们看到三个平台的行动呼吁明显减少,这表明各方的优先事项正在发生变化。在这三个被研究的平台上,把点赞作为参与度的共同衡量标准,在Facebook和Twitter上,包含行动呼吁的帖子在这段时间的最后阶段变得不那么受欢迎,而Instagram的用户在这段时间的后期阶段似乎也更有兴趣参与这类帖子。该研究以对主要发现的讨论结束,并为未来的研究工作提出了一些方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Science Computer Review
Social Science Computer Review 社会科学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.90%
发文量
95
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Unique Scope Social Science Computer Review is an interdisciplinary journal covering social science instructional and research applications of computing, as well as societal impacts of informational technology. Topics included: artificial intelligence, business, computational social science theory, computer-assisted survey research, computer-based qualitative analysis, computer simulation, economic modeling, electronic modeling, electronic publishing, geographic information systems, instrumentation and research tools, public administration, social impacts of computing and telecommunications, software evaluation, world-wide web resources for social scientists. Interdisciplinary Nature Because the Uses and impacts of computing are interdisciplinary, so is Social Science Computer Review. The journal is of direct relevance to scholars and scientists in a wide variety of disciplines. In its pages you''ll find work in the following areas: sociology, anthropology, political science, economics, psychology, computer literacy, computer applications, and methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书