Generative AI Usage by Individuals During the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election: Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Analysis

IF 4.3 2区 社会学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Wanli Liu, Xuequn Wang, Yibai Li
{"title":"Generative AI Usage by Individuals During the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election: Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Analysis","authors":"Wanli Liu, Xuequn Wang, Yibai Li","doi":"10.1177/08944393251392913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With generative artificial intelligence’s (GenAI) growing popularity, individuals are increasingly using it when searching for election-related information. This scenario raises concerns that GenAI usage may result in widespread dissemination of misinformation, given its ability to generate seemingly authentic information. Nevertheless, despite the importance of Gen AI, few researchers have examined how individuals use this tool to search for election-related information. This study aims to assess how GenAI’s perceived system (i.e., accessibility and integration) and information quality (i.e., completeness, accuracy, and neutrality) impact its usage. Focusing on the 2024 U.S. presidential election, we conducted a two-wave survey and data was collected from 364 Americans. Participants were found to have a favorable attitude overall toward GenAI. Further, accuracy and neutrality were positively associated with GenAI usage. A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis was also conducted to identify different configurations of perceived system and information quality that led to high GenAI usage. Analyzing the qualitative responses further confirmed the results. This study contributes to the literature on the role of GenAI during elections, providing a nuanced understanding of how dimensions of GenAI’s perceived system and information quality impact individuals’ GenAI usage. The findings have significant practical implications for dealing with the (mis)information generated by GenAI.","PeriodicalId":49509,"journal":{"name":"Social Science Computer Review","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science Computer Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393251392913","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With generative artificial intelligence’s (GenAI) growing popularity, individuals are increasingly using it when searching for election-related information. This scenario raises concerns that GenAI usage may result in widespread dissemination of misinformation, given its ability to generate seemingly authentic information. Nevertheless, despite the importance of Gen AI, few researchers have examined how individuals use this tool to search for election-related information. This study aims to assess how GenAI’s perceived system (i.e., accessibility and integration) and information quality (i.e., completeness, accuracy, and neutrality) impact its usage. Focusing on the 2024 U.S. presidential election, we conducted a two-wave survey and data was collected from 364 Americans. Participants were found to have a favorable attitude overall toward GenAI. Further, accuracy and neutrality were positively associated with GenAI usage. A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis was also conducted to identify different configurations of perceived system and information quality that led to high GenAI usage. Analyzing the qualitative responses further confirmed the results. This study contributes to the literature on the role of GenAI during elections, providing a nuanced understanding of how dimensions of GenAI’s perceived system and information quality impact individuals’ GenAI usage. The findings have significant practical implications for dealing with the (mis)information generated by GenAI.
2024年美国总统大选期间个人对生成式人工智能的使用:对称和不对称分析
随着生成式人工智能(GenAI)的日益普及,个人在搜索与选举相关的信息时越来越多地使用它。这种情况引起了人们的担忧,即使用GenAI可能会导致错误信息的广泛传播,因为它能够产生看似真实的信息。然而,尽管新一代人工智能很重要,但很少有研究人员研究过个人如何使用这一工具来搜索与选举相关的信息。本研究旨在评估GenAI的感知系统(即可访问性和集成)和信息质量(即完整性、准确性和中立性)如何影响其使用。针对2024年美国总统大选,我们进行了两波调查,收集了364名美国人的数据。研究发现,参与者总体上对GenAI持好感态度。此外,准确性和中立性与GenAI的使用呈正相关。通过模糊集定性比较分析,确定了导致GenAI高使用率的不同感知系统配置和信息质量。对定性反应的分析进一步证实了结果。本研究为关于GenAI在选举中的作用的文献做出了贡献,提供了对GenAI感知系统和信息质量的维度如何影响个人使用GenAI的细致理解。这些发现对于处理GenAI产生的(错误)信息具有重要的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Science Computer Review
Social Science Computer Review 社会科学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.90%
发文量
95
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Unique Scope Social Science Computer Review is an interdisciplinary journal covering social science instructional and research applications of computing, as well as societal impacts of informational technology. Topics included: artificial intelligence, business, computational social science theory, computer-assisted survey research, computer-based qualitative analysis, computer simulation, economic modeling, electronic modeling, electronic publishing, geographic information systems, instrumentation and research tools, public administration, social impacts of computing and telecommunications, software evaluation, world-wide web resources for social scientists. Interdisciplinary Nature Because the Uses and impacts of computing are interdisciplinary, so is Social Science Computer Review. The journal is of direct relevance to scholars and scientists in a wide variety of disciplines. In its pages you''ll find work in the following areas: sociology, anthropology, political science, economics, psychology, computer literacy, computer applications, and methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书