The use of machine learning in predicting clinical outcomes in emergency pre-examination triage: A systematic review of the literature

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
International Emergency Nursing Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-28 DOI:10.1016/j.ienj.2025.101705
Yao Jiang , Jing Zhao , Hu Juan
{"title":"The use of machine learning in predicting clinical outcomes in emergency pre-examination triage: A systematic review of the literature","authors":"Yao Jiang ,&nbsp;Jing Zhao ,&nbsp;Hu Juan","doi":"10.1016/j.ienj.2025.101705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the application status of machine learning model in the prediction of clinical outcomes in emergency pre-examination and triage, and to analyze its characteristics, advantages and disadvantages, so as to add an objective tool for medical staff to predict the clinical outcome of patients in the process of pre-examination and triage.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The literature review method was used to search PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, China Biomedical Literature Database, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP and other databases, and the literature that met the inclusion criteria was screened and the specific information of the machine learning model in the literature was extracted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 12 articles that met the criteria were included, including 5 machine learning models, which were mainly used in clinical outcomes such as hospital admission, death, intensive care unit admission, hospital transfer, and home.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The overall sensitivity of the machine learning model is high, but there are few literature studies on the prediction of clinical outcomes for pre-test triage, so relevant large-sample studies should be carried out in clinical practice to achieve the combination of subjective and objective evaluation tools to improve the accuracy of prediction and ensure patient safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48914,"journal":{"name":"International Emergency Nursing","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 101705"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X25001363","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the application status of machine learning model in the prediction of clinical outcomes in emergency pre-examination and triage, and to analyze its characteristics, advantages and disadvantages, so as to add an objective tool for medical staff to predict the clinical outcome of patients in the process of pre-examination and triage.

Methods

The literature review method was used to search PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, China Biomedical Literature Database, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP and other databases, and the literature that met the inclusion criteria was screened and the specific information of the machine learning model in the literature was extracted.

Results

A total of 12 articles that met the criteria were included, including 5 machine learning models, which were mainly used in clinical outcomes such as hospital admission, death, intensive care unit admission, hospital transfer, and home.

Conclusion

The overall sensitivity of the machine learning model is high, but there are few literature studies on the prediction of clinical outcomes for pre-test triage, so relevant large-sample studies should be carried out in clinical practice to achieve the combination of subjective and objective evaluation tools to improve the accuracy of prediction and ensure patient safety.
机器学习在预测紧急检查前分诊临床结果中的应用:文献系统综述。
目的:探讨机器学习模型在急诊预诊分诊临床结果预测中的应用现状,分析其特点、优缺点,为医务人员在预诊分诊过程中预测患者临床结果增加一个客观的工具。方法:采用文献综述法,检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane Library、中国生物医学文献数据库、CNKI、万方、VIP等数据库,筛选出符合纳入标准的文献,提取文献中机器学习模型的具体信息。结果:共纳入符合标准的文献12篇,包括5个机器学习模型,主要用于住院、死亡、重症监护病房入住、转院、回家等临床结局。结论:机器学习模型整体敏感性较高,但对预试分诊临床结局预测的文献研究较少,在临床实践中应开展相关大样本研究,实现主客观评价工具的结合,提高预测准确性,保障患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: International Emergency Nursing is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to nurses and other professionals involved in emergency care. It aims to promote excellence through dissemination of high quality research findings, specialist knowledge and discussion of professional issues that reflect the diversity of this field. With an international readership and authorship, it provides a platform for practitioners worldwide to communicate and enhance the evidence-base of emergency care. The journal publishes a broad range of papers, from personal reflection to primary research findings, created by first-time through to reputable authors from a number of disciplines. It brings together research from practice, education, theory, and operational management, relevant to all levels of staff working in emergency care settings worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书