Reframing Gender-Inclusive Language in German Education: Politics, Pedagogy, and Possibilities

IF 0.3 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Maureen O. Gallagher
{"title":"Reframing Gender-Inclusive Language in German Education: Politics, Pedagogy, and Possibilities","authors":"Maureen O. Gallagher","doi":"10.1111/tger.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recently in Germany the question of gender-inclusive language has become another front in the culture wars. Headlines portray these linguistic innovations as disruptive and unnecessary while politicians across Germany have moved to ban or restrict certain types of inclusive language. In this research article, I analyze the representations of gender-inclusive language from political parties and language organizations within Germany, as well as linguistic innovations from nonbinary and queer individuals and grassroots groups. I contrast these discussions in the press and the political arena in Germany with more inclusive perspectives and approaches from the pedagogical world of teaching German outside of Germany. I will discuss how German teachers and researchers like myself approach gender diversity and introduce alternative conceptual frameworks for understanding the relationship between gender and language, including Kris Knisely and Joshua Paiz's concept of queer inquiry-based pedagogies (QIBPs), Yuliya Komska, Michelle Moyd and David Gramling's <i>Linguistic Disobedience</i> (2019), intercultural competence, and culturally responsive pedagogy. These alternative understandings of language, power, and gender show how the language classroom can be seen not as a site for the dissemination of the linguistic and cultural norms of the source culture but instead as a space of encounter, where issues such as gender can be investigated and negotiated.</p>","PeriodicalId":43693,"journal":{"name":"Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German","volume":"58 2","pages":"175-185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tger.70020","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tger.70020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently in Germany the question of gender-inclusive language has become another front in the culture wars. Headlines portray these linguistic innovations as disruptive and unnecessary while politicians across Germany have moved to ban or restrict certain types of inclusive language. In this research article, I analyze the representations of gender-inclusive language from political parties and language organizations within Germany, as well as linguistic innovations from nonbinary and queer individuals and grassroots groups. I contrast these discussions in the press and the political arena in Germany with more inclusive perspectives and approaches from the pedagogical world of teaching German outside of Germany. I will discuss how German teachers and researchers like myself approach gender diversity and introduce alternative conceptual frameworks for understanding the relationship between gender and language, including Kris Knisely and Joshua Paiz's concept of queer inquiry-based pedagogies (QIBPs), Yuliya Komska, Michelle Moyd and David Gramling's Linguistic Disobedience (2019), intercultural competence, and culturally responsive pedagogy. These alternative understandings of language, power, and gender show how the language classroom can be seen not as a site for the dissemination of the linguistic and cultural norms of the source culture but instead as a space of encounter, where issues such as gender can be investigated and negotiated.

德语教育中性别包容性语言的重构:政治、教育学和可能性
最近,在德国,性别包容性语言的问题已成为文化战争的另一条战线。头条新闻将这些语言创新描述为破坏性的和不必要的,而德国各地的政治家已经采取行动禁止或限制某些类型的包容性语言。在这篇研究文章中,我分析了来自德国政党和语言组织的性别包容性语言的表现,以及来自非二元和酷儿个人和基层团体的语言创新。我将德国媒体和政治舞台上的这些讨论与德国以外的德语教学世界更具包容性的观点和方法进行了对比。我将讨论像我这样的德国教师和研究人员如何处理性别多样性,并介绍理解性别与语言之间关系的其他概念框架,包括克里斯·尼尼斯利和约书亚·佩兹的酷儿探究教学法(QIBPs)概念,尤利娅·科姆斯卡,米歇尔·莫伊德和大卫·格拉姆林的语言不服从(2019),跨文化能力和文化响应教学法。这些对语言、权力和性别的不同理解表明,语言课堂不应被视为传播源文化的语言和文化规范的场所,而应被视为一个相遇的空间,在这里,性别等问题可以被调查和协商。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German
Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书